Aligning Teacher Education Reforms with Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Goals: A Critical Analysis of India’s National Education Policy 2020

Authors

  • B.K. Pal
  • Sharad Sharma
  • Meenakshi Dadhich
  • Tapasya Sharda
  • Suman
  • Meenakshi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i2S.8785

Keywords:

National Education Policy 2020, Foundational Literacy and Numeracy, Teacher Education, Early Childhood Education, Educational Reform, India

Abstract

This study tries to understand the impact of teacher education reforms introduced under India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, with a focused lens on aligning teacher training with the foundational literacy and numeracy (FLN) mission. NEP 2020 emphasizes the attainment of universal FLN by Grade 3, recognizing it as a non-negotiable prerequisite for all future learning. Given that teacher effectiveness directly influences learning outcomes, the policy calls for transformative restructuring of both pre-service and in-service teacher education systems.

This qualitative study involved 22 participants—comprising 9 female and 13 male Assistant Professors—from District Institutes of Education and Training (DIETs) under SCERT, Delhi. Their experiences and perceptions were analyzed using NVivo software through thematic content analysis of semi-structured interviews. Data coding generated four key themes: curriculum responsiveness to FLN, faculty preparedness, implementation challenges, and digital platform utility (e.g., DIKSHA).

National data supports the urgency of the FLN mission. The ASER 2023 report indicates that only 43.3% of Grade 3 students in rural India can read a Grade 1-level text, while just 26.1% can perform basic subtraction. NEP 2020's target to achieve FLN by 2026-27 through the NIPUN Bharat Mission has catalyzed reforms, but implementation gaps persist, particularly in the teacher preparation ecosystem.

Findings suggest that while NEP 2020 has established a visionary policy framework, ground-level alignment remains inconsistent. Participants identified mismatches between the envisioned FLN pedagogies and existing teacher training curricula. Limited digital proficiency, inadequate training in early-grade pedagogy, and institutional rigidity emerged as significant constraints. However, participants also shared emerging innovations, such as integrating FLN modules into the four-year B.Ed. program and conducting need-based professional development workshops. The study recommends national-level FLN benchmarks for teacher education programs, institutional restructuring for real-time mentoring, and enhanced collaboration between SCERTs, NCERT, and teacher education institutions. These systemic efforts can ensure sustainable alignment of teacher preparation with India's foundational learning goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

Ministry of Education. (2021). NIPUN Bharat: National Initiative for Proficiency in Reading with Understanding and Numeracy. Department of School Education & Literacy. https://dsel.education.gov.in/nipu

National Council for Teacher Education. (2021). Guidelines for the National Mission on Foundational Literacy and Numeracy. NCTE.

NCERT. (2021). Learning Outcomes at the Elementary Stage. National Council of Educational Research and Training.

Rao, N., & Sun, J. (2015). Quality of early childhood education: Evidence from Asia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40723-015-0004-9

Banerji, R., Bhattacharjea, S., & Wadhwa, W. (2013). The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER). ASER Centre.

Sriprakash, A. (2012). Pedagogies for development: The politics and practice of child-centred education in India. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016872

Azim Premji Foundation. (2019). Teachers and Teaching in India: A Status Report. https://azimpremjifoundation.org

Pritchett, L., & Beatty, A. (2012). The negative consequences of overambitious curricula in developing countries. Center for Global Development Working Paper 293. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/negative-consequences-overambitious-curricula-developing-countries

Ramachandran, V. (2015). Teachers in the education system. In R. Govinda (Ed.), India Education Report (pp. 181–194). Oxford University Press.

Jain, M. (2022). Implementing foundational learning goals: Challenges for teacher education in India. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 19(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849221078652

World Bank. (2021). Transforming the Education Workforce: Learning Teams for a Learning Generation. Education Commission. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication

Singal, N. (2021). Multilingualism and inclusive education: Policy promises and classroom realities in India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1673953

Bhattacharya, D., & Sharma, A. (2020). Assessing teacher preparedness for foundational literacy goals: A Delhi case study. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 34(3), 55–72.

National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA). (2020). District Information System for Education (UDISE+) 2019-20 Report. Ministry of Education, Government of India.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-07

How to Cite

1.
Pal B, Sharma S, Dadhich M, Sharda T, Suman S, Meenakshi M. Aligning Teacher Education Reforms with Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Goals: A Critical Analysis of India’s National Education Policy 2020. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Aug.7 [cited 2025Sep.15];14(2S):619-24. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8785

Most read articles by the same author(s)