Aligning Teacher Education Reforms with Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Goals: A Critical Analysis of India’s National Education Policy 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i2S.8785Keywords:
National Education Policy 2020, Foundational Literacy and Numeracy, Teacher Education, Early Childhood Education, Educational Reform, IndiaAbstract
This study tries to understand the impact of teacher education reforms introduced under India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, with a focused lens on aligning teacher training with the foundational literacy and numeracy (FLN) mission. NEP 2020 emphasizes the attainment of universal FLN by Grade 3, recognizing it as a non-negotiable prerequisite for all future learning. Given that teacher effectiveness directly influences learning outcomes, the policy calls for transformative restructuring of both pre-service and in-service teacher education systems.
This qualitative study involved 22 participants—comprising 9 female and 13 male Assistant Professors—from District Institutes of Education and Training (DIETs) under SCERT, Delhi. Their experiences and perceptions were analyzed using NVivo software through thematic content analysis of semi-structured interviews. Data coding generated four key themes: curriculum responsiveness to FLN, faculty preparedness, implementation challenges, and digital platform utility (e.g., DIKSHA).
National data supports the urgency of the FLN mission. The ASER 2023 report indicates that only 43.3% of Grade 3 students in rural India can read a Grade 1-level text, while just 26.1% can perform basic subtraction. NEP 2020's target to achieve FLN by 2026-27 through the NIPUN Bharat Mission has catalyzed reforms, but implementation gaps persist, particularly in the teacher preparation ecosystem.
Findings suggest that while NEP 2020 has established a visionary policy framework, ground-level alignment remains inconsistent. Participants identified mismatches between the envisioned FLN pedagogies and existing teacher training curricula. Limited digital proficiency, inadequate training in early-grade pedagogy, and institutional rigidity emerged as significant constraints. However, participants also shared emerging innovations, such as integrating FLN modules into the four-year B.Ed. program and conducting need-based professional development workshops. The study recommends national-level FLN benchmarks for teacher education programs, institutional restructuring for real-time mentoring, and enhanced collaboration between SCERTs, NCERT, and teacher education institutions. These systemic efforts can ensure sustainable alignment of teacher preparation with India's foundational learning goals.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2021). NIPUN Bharat: National Initiative for Proficiency in Reading with Understanding and Numeracy. Department of School Education & Literacy. https://dsel.education.gov.in/nipu
National Council for Teacher Education. (2021). Guidelines for the National Mission on Foundational Literacy and Numeracy. NCTE.
NCERT. (2021). Learning Outcomes at the Elementary Stage. National Council of Educational Research and Training.
Rao, N., & Sun, J. (2015). Quality of early childhood education: Evidence from Asia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40723-015-0004-9
Banerji, R., Bhattacharjea, S., & Wadhwa, W. (2013). The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER). ASER Centre.
Sriprakash, A. (2012). Pedagogies for development: The politics and practice of child-centred education in India. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016872
Azim Premji Foundation. (2019). Teachers and Teaching in India: A Status Report. https://azimpremjifoundation.org
Pritchett, L., & Beatty, A. (2012). The negative consequences of overambitious curricula in developing countries. Center for Global Development Working Paper 293. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/negative-consequences-overambitious-curricula-developing-countries
Ramachandran, V. (2015). Teachers in the education system. In R. Govinda (Ed.), India Education Report (pp. 181–194). Oxford University Press.
Jain, M. (2022). Implementing foundational learning goals: Challenges for teacher education in India. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 19(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849221078652
World Bank. (2021). Transforming the Education Workforce: Learning Teams for a Learning Generation. Education Commission. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication
Singal, N. (2021). Multilingualism and inclusive education: Policy promises and classroom realities in India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1673953
Bhattacharya, D., & Sharma, A. (2020). Assessing teacher preparedness for foundational literacy goals: A Delhi case study. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 34(3), 55–72.
National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA). (2020). District Information System for Education (UDISE+) 2019-20 Report. Ministry of Education, Government of India.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.