Advances In Bioprinting Of Vascularized Tissue Constructs For Reconstructive Surgery: A Review Of Breakthrough Technologies
Keywords:
3D bioprinting, vascularized tissue constructs, reconstructive surgery, tissue engineering, bioinks, microvascular networks, multiscale bioprinting, high-resolution bioprinting, microfluidics, computational modeling, artificial intelligence, anastomosisAbstract
The innovation of 3D bioprinting has brought about a significant change in tissue engineering, particularly in the construction of vascularized tissue structures that play a crucial role in reconstructive surgery. It presents an overview of currently available innovative technologies that permit the development of perfusable vascular networks as an alternative to conventional grafts, which have certain disadvantages related to the supply problem and immunocompatibility concerns. The new resolution levels can be recapitulated using state-of-the-art bioprinting technologies, such as multiscale coaxial printing and two-photon polymerization, to recreate vascular hierarchies. Emerging bioinks, including self-assembling peptides, VEGF bioinks, and magnetically responsive hydrogels, enhance endothelial orientation and mechanical tailorability. This is achieved by providing perfusable channels through microfluidic integration; however, AI-based computational models excel in implementing vascular design and forecasting vascular remodeling. Recent findings include bioprinted constructs capable of anastomosis, which have been successfully integrated into and reconstituted hosts in preclinical studies. Additionally, vascularised organoids have shown improved functionality, with a few notable examples including liver constructs with the integration of bile ducts. Applications include skin, bone, and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction, with clinical translation steps involving first-in-human trials of vascular grafts. Scaffolding issues, such as scalability, cell viability, and regulatory standardization, still exist; however, innovations like in situ bioprinting and 4D shape-morphing constructs are pointing to a revolutionary future. As highlighted by this review, this holds the promise to revolutionize reconstructive surgery, reducing the use of autografts and promising to improve patient outcomes through the personalization and scalability of solutions. Further cross-disciplinary cooperation and funding are needed to overcome the technical and ethical barriers, and avenues should be opened for clinical implementation
Downloads
References
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2023). 2023 plastic surgery statistics report. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2023/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2023.pdf
Bernal, P. N., Delrot, P., Loterie, D., Li, Y., Malda, J., Moser, C., & Levato, R. (2019). Volumetric bioprinting of complex living-tissue constructs within seconds. Advanced Materials, 31(42), Article e1904209. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904209
Dimitriou, R., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2011). Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Medicine, 9, Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-66
Fishman, J. A. (2007). Infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(25), 2601–2614. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra064928
Gao, Q., He, Y., Fu, J. Z., Liu, A., & Ma, L. (2015). Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials, 61, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031
Grigoryan, B., Paulsen, S. J., Corbett, D. C., Sazer, D. W., Fortin, C. L., Zaita, A. J., & Miller, J. S. (2019). Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science, 364(6439), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9750
Groll, J., Burdick, J. A., Cho, D. W., Derby, B., Gelinsky, M., Heilshorn, S. C., & Malda, J. (2018). A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication, 11(1), Article 013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52
Guillemot, F., Mironov, V., & Nakamura, M. (2010). Bioprinting is coming of age: Report from the International Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bordeaux (3B’09). Biofabrication, 2(1), Article 010201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/010201
Guillotin, B., Souquet, A., Catros, S., Duocastella, M., Pippenger, B., Bellance, S., & Guillemot, F. (2010). Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials, 31(28), 7250–7256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055
Hedegaard, C. L., Collin, E. C., Redondo-Gómez, C., Nguyen, L. T., Ng, K. W., Castells-Sala, C., & Mata, A. (2018). Hydrodynamically guided hierarchical self-assembly of peptide-protein bioinks. Advanced Functional Materials, 28(8), Article 1703716. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201703716
Highley, C. B., Rodell, C. B., & Burdick, J. A. (2015). Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Advanced Materials, 27(34), 5075–5079. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501234
Hinton, T. J., Jallerat, Q., Palchesko, R. N., Park, J. H., Grodzicki, M. S., Shue, H. J., & Feinberg, A. W. (2015). Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Science Advances, 1(9), Article e1500758. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758
Homan, K. A., Kolesky, D. B., Skylar-Scott, M. A., Herrmann, J., Obuobi, H., Moisan, A., & Lewis, J. A. (2016). Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on perfusable chips. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 34845. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34845
Jain, R. K., Au, P., Tam, J., Duda, D. G., & Fukumura, D. (2005). Engineering vascularized tissue. Nature Biotechnology, 23(7), 821–823. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0705-821
Kim, B. S., Kwon, Y. W., Kong, J. S., Park, G. T., Gao, G., Han, W., & Cho, D. W. (2018). 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo pre-vascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: A step towards advanced skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 168, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.040
Kolesky, D. B., Homan, K. A., Skylar-Scott, M. A., & Lewis, J. A. (2016). Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(12), 3179–3184. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521342113
Kusuma, S., Shen, Y. I., Hanjaya-Putra, D., Mali, P., Cheng, L., & Gerecht, S. (2013). Self-organized vascular networks from human pluripotent stem cells in a synthetic matrix. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(31), 12601–12606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306562110
Li, C., Faulkner-Jones, A., Dun, A. R., Jin, J., Chen, P., Xing, Y., & Shu, W. (2015). Rapid formation of a supramolecular polypeptide-DNA hydrogel for in situ three-dimensional multilayer bioprinting. Biomaterials, 54, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.012
Li, J., Chen, M., Fan, X., & Zhou, H. (2016). Recent advances in bioprinting techniques: Approaches, applications and future prospects. Journal of Translational Medicine, 14, Article 271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1028-0
Loo, Y., Goktas, M., Tekinay, A. B., Guler, M. O., Hauser, C. A., & Mitraki, A. (2015). Self-assembled proteins and peptides as scaffolds for tissue engineering. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4(16), 2557–2586. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500402
Mandrycky, C., Wang, Z., Kim, K., & Kim, D. H. (2016). 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnology Advances, 34(4), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
Margariti, A., Winkler, B., Karamariti, E., Zampetaki, A., Tsai, T. N., Seed, M., & Xu, Q. (2012). Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into endothelial cells capable of angiogenesis and reendothelialization in tissue-engineered vessels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(34), 13793–13798. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205526109
Noor, N., Shapira, A., Edri, R., Gal, I., Wertheim, L., & Dvir, T. (2019). 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts. Advanced Science, 6(11), Article 1900344. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344
Norotte, C., Marga, F. S., Niklason, L. E., & Forgacs, G. (2009). Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials, 30(30), 5910–5917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034
Ovsianikov, A., Gruene, M., Pflaum, M., Koch, L., Maiorana, F., Wilhelmi, M., Haverich, A., & Chichkov, B. (2010). Laser printing of cells into 3D scaffolds. Biofabrication, 2(1), Article 014104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014104
Panchal, J., & Uttchin, V. (2003). Management of craniosynostosis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 111(6), 2032–2048. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000056839.94034.47
Pati, F., Jang, J., Ha, D. H., Won Kim, S., Rhie, J. W., Shim, J. H., & Cho, D. W. (2014). Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nature Communications, 5, Article 3935. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935
Rouwkema, J., & Khademhosseini, A. (2016). Vascularization and angiogenesis in tissue engineering: Beyond creating static networks. Trends in Biotechnology, 34(9), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002
Xiong, R., Zhang, Z., Chai, W., Huang, Y., & Chrisey, D. B. (2015). Freeform drop-on-demand laser printing of 3D alginate and cellular constructs. Biofabrication, 7(4), 045011
Zhang, H., Shi, J., Hachet, M. A., Xue, C., Bauer, R. C., Jiang, H., & Reilly, M. P. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human iPSC-derived macrophage reveals lysosomal acid lipase function in human macrophages—brief report. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 37(11), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310017
Zhu, W., Qu, X., Zhu, J., Ma, X., Patel, S., Liu, J., & Chen, S. (2017). Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials, 124, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
..
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.