Evaluation Of Radiographic Skills Of Radiographers During Patient Load And Their Behavior Towards Patients

Authors

  • Gowhar Junaid
  • Peerzada Mohammad Iflaq
  • Kangan Saraswati
  • Swati Thakur
  • Junaid Ul Islam

Keywords:

ALARA principle, Ionizing Radiation, Radiation Protection, Personal Protective Equipment

Abstract

A valid necessity for performing a radiographic examination in the radiological department is presented here. The study aims to educate radiographers on medical diagnostic imaging and technologies. These days, X-rays and many other advanced ionizing radiation-based diagnostic technologies are utilized daily and are believed to be the best ways to diagnose various diseases and ailments. Their understanding of radiation safety is, therefore, crucial. Since the general public is unaware of the negative effects of ionizing radiation exposure, medical professionals who work directly with patients must take the necessary precautions to safeguard both themselves and the public. This qualitative observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, SGT Hospital, and Gurugram, where a minimum of 8 radiographers were taken in this study, in which both male and female radiographers were included from 2021 to 2023 and will demonstrate how radiographers behave in the workplace. Study data was received from the Department of Radiodiagnosis, SGT Hospital, Gurugram, where all the radiography was carried out. Both male and female radiographers were included during the study and observed on their communication skills, attitude, and behavior towards patients during heavy and low patient loads following the ALARA principle. Only 50% of radiographers were aware of the ALARA principle. As a result, individuals are more likely to experience an ionizing radiation-related problem. To keep up a high level of radiation protection, hospital management should be concerned with regular training programs that will help their personal development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Lewis, S., Pieterse, T., & Lawrence, H. (2019). Evaluating the use of exposure indicators in digital x-ray imaging system: Gauteng South Africa. Radiography (London, England: 1995), 25(3), e58–e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.003

European Society of Radiology (ESR). Electronic address: communications@myesr.org, & European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Electronic address: info@efrs.eu. (2019). Patient safety in medical imaging: A joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography (London, England: 1995), 25(2), e26–e38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.009

Ploussi, A., &Efstathopoulos, E. P. (2016). Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in Radiology Department. World Journal of Radiology, 8(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.142

Mc Fadden, S., et al. ‘Digital Imaging and Radiographic Practice in Diagnostic Radiography: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Practice in Europe’. Radiography, vol. 24, no. 2, May 2018, pp. 137–41. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.11.004.

Moolman, N., et al. ‘Radiographer Knowledge and Practice of Pediatric Radiation Dose Protocols in Digital Radiography in Gauteng’. Radiography, vol. 26, no. 2, May 2020, pp. 117–21. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.006.

Shabani, Fatemeh, et al. ‘Radiation Protection Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) in Interventional Radiology’. Oman Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 141–47. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2018.26.

Siewert, Bettina, et al. ‘Practice Policy and Quality Initiatives: Strategies for Optimizing Staff Safety in a Radiology Department’. Radio Graphics, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 245–61. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.331125174.

Handloser, John S., and Robert A. Love. ‘Radiation Doses from Diagnostic X-Ray Studies’. Radiology, vol. 57, no. 2, Aug. 1951, pp. 252–54. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1148/57.2.252.

Ploussi, Agapi, and Efstathios P. Efstathopoulos. ‘Importance of Establishing Radiation Protection Culture in Radiology Department’. World Journal of Radiology, vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, p. 142. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.142.

Balonov, M. I., and P. C. Shrimpton. ‘Effective Dose and Risks from Medical X-Ray Procedures’. Annals of the ICRP, vol. 41, no. 3–4, Oct. 2012, pp. 129–41. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.002.

Broder, J. C., Cameron, S. F., Korn, W. T., & Baccei, S. J. (2018). Creating a radiology quality and safety program: Principles and pitfalls. Radio graphics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 38(6), 1786–1798. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018180032.

Vow, J., & Williams, I. (2017). Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues? Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 64(3), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.211.

Di Michele, L., et al. ‘Knowledge Translation: Radiographers Compared to Other Healthcare Professionals’. Radiography, vol. 26, Oct. 2020, pp. S27–32. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.007.

Ratnawati, I. Gusti Agung Ayu, et al. ‘The Linearity of X-Ray Devices Radiation Output and Its Relationship with Patient Thickness’. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, Nov. 2019, pp. 1–6. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.29332/ijpse.v3n3.351.

Handloser, John S., and Robert A. Love. ‘Radiation Doses from Diagnostic X-Ray Studies’. Radiology, vol. 57, no. 2, Aug. 1951, pp. 252–54. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1148/57.2.252.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-26

How to Cite

1.
Junaid G, Iflaq PM, Saraswati K, Thakur S, Islam JU. Evaluation Of Radiographic Skills Of Radiographers During Patient Load And Their Behavior Towards Patients. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.26 [cited 2025Jul.15];14(32S):2360-5. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7748

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 32S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.