The Impact of 3D Imaging on Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Planning: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i18S.5349Keywords:
3D Imaging, CBCT, Digital Models, Diagnosis, Orthodontics, Patient Outcomes, Radiation Exposure, Treatment PlanningAbstract
The introduction of three-dimensional (3D) imaging in orthodontics has significantly transformed diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient care. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging techniques, such as X-rays and cephalometric radiographs, provide limited insight into the complex 3D structures of the craniofacial region. Recent advancements in 3D imaging technologies like Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), 3D facial scanning, and digital models have provided more accurate and detailed visualizations, leading to improved orthodontic practices.
Objective
This systematic literature review aims to evaluate the applications, advantages, limitations, and clinical impacts of 3D imaging technologies in orthodontics. The review synthesizes findings from multiple studies to provide an in-depth analysis of the role of 3D imaging in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning.
Methods
A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed articles was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria focused on clinical trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024, involving human subjects and discussing 3D imaging in orthodontic applications. A total of 8 studies were selected for inclusion based on relevance and quality.
Results
The review highlights the significant benefits of 3D imaging, including improved diagnostic precision, detailed visualization of craniofacial structures, and more accurate treatment planning. CBCT has become particularly valuable in diagnosing complex cases, while 3D facial scanning and digital models have enhanced clear aligner therapy. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the high cost of equipment, radiation exposure concerns, and the need for specialized software and training.
Conclusion
3D imaging technologies have revolutionized orthodontics, offering enhanced diagnostic tools, better treatment outcomes, and personalized care. However, barriers to widespread adoption, such as cost and radiation exposure, need to be addressed. Future research should focus on optimizing these technologies for broader accessibility and improving patient safety.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Kashwani R, Ahuja G, Narula V, Jose AT, Kulkarni V, Hajong R, et al. Controversies around Orthodontic Treatment and TMD Etiologies. Dent Pract J. 2024;6(2):180092.
Karatas OH, Toy E. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8(1):132–40.
Abdelkarim A. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Dent J (Basel). 2019; 7(3):89.
Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017; 51(3 Suppl 1):S102–21.
Kenkare P, Shetty S, Mangal U, Ashith MV, Shetty S. The Utilization of Three-Dimensional Technology for an Accurate Diagnosis and Precise Treatment Planning in the Field of Orthodontics. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2021; 14(4).
Palomo JM, Yang C, Hans MG. Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Imaging in Orthodontics. J Med Sci. 2005:269–78.
Lane C, Harrell W Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4):612–20.
Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the conebeam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8(9):1558–64.
Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(4):344–9.
Toureno L, Park JH, Cederberg RA, Hwang EH, Shin JW. Identification of supernumerary teeth in 2D and 3D: review of literature and a proposal. J Dent Educ. 2013; 77(1):43–50.
Oberoi S, Gill P, Chigurupati R, Hoffman WY, Hatcher DC, Vargervik K. Three-dimensional assessment of the eruption path of the canine in individuals with bone-grafted alveolar clefts using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010; 47(5):507–12.
Wadhawan R, Dhir G, Borah MJ, Patil MS, Yadav P, Soni D. The digital dentition: 3D printing’s impact on orthodontic care. Nanotechnol Percept. 2024; 20(S16):e3867.
Meehan M, Teschner M, Girod S. Three-dimensional simulation and prediction of craniofacial surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6:102–7.
Kim YK, Lee NK, Moon SW, Jang MJ, Kim HS, Yun PY. Evaluation of soft tissue changes around the lips after bracket debonding using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85(5):833–40.
Ayoub AF, Siebert P, Moos KF, Wray D, Urquhart C, Niblett TB. A vision based 3D capture system for maxillofacial assessment and surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 36(5):353–7.
Coban G, Yavuz I, Karadas B, Demirbas AE. Three-dimensional assessment of nasal changes after maxillary advancement with impaction using stereophotogrammetry. Korean J Orthod. 2020; 50(4):249–57.
Hall RK. The role of CT, MRI and 3D imaging in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint and other orofacial disorders in children. Aust Orthod J. 1994; 13(2):86–94.
Mah J, Hatcher D. Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6(Suppl 1):10–6.
Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M, Siebert JP. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002; 17(4):318–30.
Aboul-Hosn Centenero S, Hernández-Alfaro F. 3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results–our experience in 16 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40(2):162–8.
Lane C, Harrell W Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008; 133(4):612–20.
Scholz RP. Considerations in selecting a digital camera for orthodontic records. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998; 114(5):603–5.
Smith SL, Throckmorton GS. A new technique for three-dimensional ultrasound scanning of facial tissues. J Forensic Sci. 2004; 49(3):451–7.
Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, English J, Xia JJ. Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2007; 3(2):97–110.
Zhang GX, Zhao ZH, Wang BY, Xu LJ, Feng GC, Qian WY. The application of multi-slice CT and MRI on maxillofacial region soft tissue measurement. Shanghai J Stomatol. 2010;19(5):460–3.
Hwang HS, Kim K, Moon DN, Kim JH, Wilkinson C. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue thicknesses for craniofacial reconstruction using cone-beam CT images. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 57(2):443–8.
Tomášik J, Zsoldos M, Oravcová Ľ, Lifková M, Pavleová G, Strunga M, et al. AI and Face-Driven Orthodontics: A Scoping Review of Digital Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. AI. 2024; 5(1):158–176.
Ma L, Yu S, Xu X, Moses Amadi S, Zhang J, Wang Z. Application of Artificial Intelligence in 3D Printing Physical Organ Models. Mater Today Bio. 2023; 23:100792.
Tsolakis IA, Gizani S, Panayi N, Antonopoulos G, Tsolakis AI. Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Orthodontics for Dental Models: A Systematic Review. Children. 2022; 9(8):1106.
Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic. World J Orthod. 2008;9(3):269–82.
Jyothikiran H, Shanthara JR, Subbiah P, Thomas M. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics--past present and future. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2014; 25(1):21–6.
Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40(4):341–52.
Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2018; 31(3):86–94.
Thawri SR, Paul P, Reche A, Rathi HP. 3D Technology Used for Precision in Orthodontics. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47170.
Polizzi A, Serra S, Leonardi R. Use of CBCT in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22):6941.
Kashwani R, Ahuja G, Narula V, Jose AT, Kulkarni V, Hajong R, et al. Future of dental care: integrating AI, metaverse, AR/VR, teledentistry, CAD & 3D printing, blockchain and CRISPR innovations. Community Pract. 2024; 21(6):123–37.
Savková N, Harvan Ľ, Jusku A, Saygili S, Jezdinská K, Hulvert J. Summary of Knowledge About 3D Printing and Its Use in Dentistry. ČSPZL. 2021;121(2):55–64.
Jeong M, Radomski K, Lopez D, Liu JT, Lee JD, Lee SJ. Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview. Dent J. 2023;12(1):1.
Guerrero-Gironés J, López-García S, Pecci-Lloret MR, Pecci-Lloret MP, Rodríguez Lozano FJ, García-Bernal D. In Vitro Biocompatibility Testing of 3D Printing and Conventional Resins for Occlusal Devices. J Dent. 2022;123:104163.
Wuersching SN, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Kollmuss M. Initial Biocompatibility of Novel Resins for 3D Printed Fixed Dental Prostheses. Dent Mater. 2022;38(10):1587–97.
Del Hougne M, Di Lorenzo I, Höhne C, Schmitter M. A retrospective cohort study on 3D printed temporary crowns. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):17295.
Knode V, Ludwig B, Hamadeh S, Pandis N, Fleming PS. An In Vitro Comparison of the Dimensional Stability of Four 3D-Printed Models Under Various Storage Conditions. Angle Orthod. 2024; 94(3):346–52.
Lo LJ, Weng JL, Ho CT, Lin HH. Three-dimensional region-based study on the relationship between soft and hard tissue changes after orthognathic surgery in patients with prognathism. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0200589.
Slaymaker J, Hirani S, Woolley J. Direct 3D Printing Aligners—Past, Present and Future Possibilities. Br Dent J. 2024; 236(5):401–5.
Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Moment-to-force ratio, center of rotation, and force level: a finite element study predicting their interdependency for simulated orthodontic loading regimens. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(5):681–9.
Kashwani R, Sawhney H. Dentistry and metaverse: A deep dive into potential of blockchain, NFTs, and crypto in healthcare. Int Dent J Stud Res. 2023; 11(3):94–8.
Kashwani R, Jose AT, Gambhir S, Virk S, Roy S. The role of the metaverse in revolutionizing dental practice: implications across all departments. Int Dent J Stud Res. 2024; 12(3):157–60.
Suresh A, Naidu SN, Inginshetty V. ENDO AI: A Novel Artificial Intelligence Framework for Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Endodontic Therapy. J Med Dent Sci Res. 2025; 12(2):12–19.
Naidu S, Suresh A. Evolution of orthodontic appliances—Then and now. Int J Dent Health Sci. 2018; 3:319–29.
Sawhney H, Salam S, Singh S, Kashwani R, Sonawane A, Gupta S, et al. Kap assessment for exploring quick response code integration in teleradiography, diagnosis, and digital imaging. Commun Pract J Commun Pract Health Visitors’ Assoc. 2024; 21(4):1450–7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
