Alternative Forms of Care with a Special Focus on NGO BOSCO’s Model of Foster Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3835Keywords:
Alternative Care, Foster Care, Child Protection, Institutional Care, BOSCO ModelAbstract
This article explores the landscape of alternative care for children in India, with a special focus on foster care as implemented by the NGO BOSCO. Grounded in the rights-based framework of child protection, the paper begins by categorizing various forms of care types – institutional, kinship, adoption and foster care. It highlights the global and national shift toward family-based alternatives, making institutional care a last resort. Drawing on both international frameworks and evolving Indian legal and policy mechanisms, such as the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, CARA guidelines, and the Mission Vatsalya scheme, the article examines how alternative care is being integrated into national child protection systems. Special attention is given to the cultural nuances of kinship care and the emerging relevance of foster care in India. The article then presents BOSCO’s grassroots model of foster care, showcasing the organization's structured processes in identifying suitable children and foster families, conducting rigorous assessments and training, ensuring smooth transitions, and ongoing monitoring. Through BOSCO’s experience, the article reflects on operational challenges, systemic gaps, and the potential of foster care as a viable alternative to institutionalization in the Indian context. The study underscores the need for strengthened community-based care models, enhanced support systems, and robust monitoring mechanisms to realize the vision of family-based care for every child in need.
Downloads
Metrics
References
1. https://data.unicef.org/how-many/how-many-children-under-18-are-there-in-india/
2. https://www.india.gov.in/my-government/documents/census-report
3. https://www.unicef.org/india/what-we-do/child-protection
Nigudkar, M. (2017). Alternative Care for Children: Policy and Practice. India: SOS Children's Villages of India and Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
United Nations General Assembly. (2010). Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children, UN document A/RES/64/142. Geneva: United Nations Retrieved from United Nations Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children | Save the Children’s Resource Centre
UNICEF. (2006). Alternative care for children without primary caregivers in Tsumani-Affected Countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Thailand. UNICEF.
UN Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children, 2010 https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://dylbw5db8047o.cloudfront.net/uploads/5416.pdf
Browne, K. D. (2009). "The Risk of Harm to Young Children in Institutional Care." Save the Children UK.
NCPCR report on CCIs in India: https://ncpcr.gov.in/uploads/167145198563a05551c7b75_national-report--social-audit-of-ccis.pdf Mapping of child care institutions.
Why institutional care is a last resort https://www.unicef.org/protection/children-in-alternative-care
Kevin Browne, Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis, et.al, “Overuse of institutional care for children in Europe” 332 BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 485-487 (2006).
Piyus Tripathi, “Bihar Shelter Home Case: We used to cut ourselves to avoid sexual abuse, reveals survivor”, The Times of India, July 29, 2018.
India Today web desk “The girls returned crying: child reveals details of abuse at UP shelter home”, India Today, August 6, 2018.
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, “Report on Social Audit of Non-Government and Government Welfare Institutions (Field Action Project on Homelessness & Destitution)”, (2006).
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Volume 76, Issue 4 p. 8-30, CHILDREN IN INSTITUTIONAL CARE: DELAYED DEVELOPMENT AND RESILIENCE, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Jesús Palacios, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, Megan R. Gunnar, Panayiota Vorria, Robert B. McCall, Lucy Le Mare, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Natasha A. Dobrova-Krol, Femmie Juffer, First published: 21 December 2011: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00626.x
Wu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Pei, F.; Lim, N. Strength and Resilience for Kinship Caregivers Raising Children: A Scoping Review. Societies 2023, 13, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13120249
Better care network
IJCRT, 2024, Increasing divorce rate in India: A critical analysis from psychological perspective : https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2406066.pdf
Dr. M Rajashekarappa (2023), Recent Changes in the Hindu Joint Family an Evolution Towards Modernity, https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/4/5840.pdf
IJCRT,2018, Changing family structures and dynamics in Urban India: https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT1135373.pdf
Vasundhra,2021 Foster care In India and its future prospects a socio-legal analysis: https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/373536
Douglas, V. I. (2020). Review on the effects of divorce on children. Journal of Current Issues in Arts and Humanities, 6(1), 67–74
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.