Personalized Surgical Planning with AI: A Machine Learning Framework

Authors

  • Kingshuk Srivastava
  • V. Purushothama Raju
  • S D N Hayath Ali
  • Jaksan D Patel
  • Amitava Podder
  • Aradhana Sahu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2543

Keywords:

personalized surgery, machine learning, surgical planning, medical imaging, AI in healthcare, precision medicine

Abstract

Personalized surgical planning has been accomplished through the manual interpretation of medical imaging and the knowledge of the surgeon. This process can be time-consuming and is prone to experiencing fluctuation. A framework for machine learning that was developed with the intention of improving surgical decision-making in terms of precision, efficiency, and patient-specificity.  The approach that has been developed incorporates multimodal medical data, such as CT scans, MRIs, and electronic health records, in order to construct predictive models for surgical risk assessment, anatomical segmentation, and intraoperative guiding.  Through the evaluation of important performance parameters like precision, recall, Dice coefficient, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC), advanced benchmarking approaches verify the trustworthiness of models.  Approaches that are driven by artificial intelligence offer solutions that are both data-driven and adaptive, thereby reducing the number of errors that are caused by humans while simultaneously improving surgical workflows.  It is possible to perform real-time predictive analytics with this framework, which also enables dynamic adjustments to be made throughout procedures.  It is anticipated that future developments, such as the incorporation of augmented reality and robotic-assisted surgery, would further refine tailored treatment options.  The use of such intelligent systems has the potential to greatly enhance patient outcomes by lowering the risk of surgical complications, improving the distribution of resources, and shortening the amount of time needed for recovery.  The transformative potential of machine learning in contemporary healthcare, paving the way for surgical planning that is safer, more efficient, and highly tailored.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Saravi, B.; Li, Z.; Lang, C.N.; Schmid, B.; Lang, F.K.; Grad, S.; Alini, M.; Richards, R.G.; Schmal, H.; Südkamp, N.; et al. The Tissue Renin-Angiotensin System and Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Major Human Diseases: Quo Vadis? Cells 2021, 10, 650.

Mavandadi, S.; Dimitrov, S.; Feng, S.; Yu, F.; Sikora, U.; Yaglidere, O.; Padmanabhan, S.; Nielsen, K.; Ozcan, A. Distributed Medical Image Analysis and Diagnosis through Crowd-Sourced Games: A Malaria Case Study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37245.

Wu, A.; March, L.; Zheng, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Blyth, F.M.; Smith, E.; Buchbinder, R.; Hoy, D. Global Low Back Pain Prevalence and Years Lived with Disability from 1990 to 2017: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 299.

Mallappallil, M.; Sabu, J.; Gruessner, A.; Salifu, M. A Review of Big Data and Medical Research. SAGE Open Med. 2020, 8, 2050312120934839.

Marcus, G. Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1801.00631.

Ford, M. Architects of Intelligence: The Truth about AI from the People Building It; Packt Publishing: Birmingham, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78913-126-0.

Cutillo, C.M.; Sharma, K.R.; Foschini, L.; Kundu, S.; Mackintosh, M.; Mandl, K.D. Machine Intelligence in Healthcare—Perspectives on Trustworthiness, Explainability, Usability, and Transparency. NPJ Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 47.

MacLean, D.L.; Heer, J. Identifying Medical Terms in Patient-Authored Text: A Crowdsourcing-Based Approach. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2013, 20, 1120–1127.

Warby, S.C.; Wendt, S.L.; Welinder, P.; Munk, E.G.S.; Carrillo, O.; Sorensen, H.B.D.; Jennum, P.; Peppard, P.E.; Perona, P.; Mignot, E. Sleep-Spindle Detection: Crowdsourcing and Evaluating Performance of Experts, Non-Experts and Automated Methods. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 385–392.

Wang, C.; Han, L.; Stein, G.; Day, S.; Bien-Gund, C.; Mathews, A.; Ong, J.J.; Zhao, P.-Z.; Wei, S.-F.; Walker, J.; et al. Crowdsourcing in Health and Medical Research: A Systematic Review. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 8.

Bohr, A.; Memarzadeh, K. The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Applications. In Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 25–60. ISBN 978-0-12-818438-7.

Huang, S.-C.; Pareek, A.; Seyyedi, S.; Banerjee, I.; Lungren, M.P. Fusion of Medical Imaging and Electronic Health Records Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Implementation Guidelines. NPJ Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 136.

Hyun, S.H.; Ahn, M.S.; Koh, Y.W.; Lee, S.J. A Machine-Learning Approach Using PET-Based Radiomics to Predict the Histological Subtypes of Lung Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, 956–960.

Siccoli, A.; de Wispelaere, M.P.; Schröder, M.L. Machine Learning– Based Preoperative Predictive Analytics for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Neurosurg. Focus 2019, 46, 5.

André, A.; Peyrou, B.; Carpentier, A.; Vignaux, J.-J. Feasibility and Assessment of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Outcome After Lumbar Decompression Surgery. Glob. Spine J. 2020, 11, 219256822096937.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-24

How to Cite

1.
Srivastava K, Raju VP, Hayath Ali SDN, Patel JD, Podder A, Sahu A. Personalized Surgical Planning with AI: A Machine Learning Framework. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Mar.24 [cited 2025Oct.3];14(8S):309-15. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2543

Most read articles by the same author(s)