The Role of Innovation Culture in Enhancing Employee Engagement: Evidence from Selected IT Firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2117Keywords:
N/AAbstract
This study explores the impact of innovation culture on employee engagement in selected IT firms, utilizing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the proposed hypotheses. Data was collected from 400 IT employees to analyze how a culture that encourages creativity, risk-taking, and continuous learning influences employee commitment, motivation, and job involvement. The findings indicate a strong positive relationship between innovation culture and employee engagement, emphasizing the significance of leadership support, knowledge-sharing mechanisms, and an adaptive organizational environment. Organizations that prioritize innovation create an atmosphere where employees feel valued, motivated, and empowered to contribute actively to business growth. The study highlights that fostering a culture of open communication, collaboration, and recognition enhances employee satisfaction and retention. Additionally, results suggest that firms with a strong innovation culture witness higher levels of employee participation in problem-solving, creativity, and performance excellence. The research provides valuable managerial implications, suggesting that IT firms should implement policies and practices that nurture an innovation-driven workplace, including flexible work environments, investment in continuous skill development, and incentives for innovative contributions. By strengthening the innovation culture, IT firms can enhance employee engagement, leading to improved productivity, reduced turnover, and long-term organizational success. This study contributes to the growing literature on workplace engagement and innovation, offering empirical evidence that supports the integration of innovation strategies to enhance workforce enthusiasm. Future research could further investigate the moderating effects of individual employee traits and organizational structures on the relationship between innovation culture and engagement in different industry settings.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Afsar, B., Masood, M., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). The role of job crafting and knowledge sharing on the relationship between innovative work behavior and in-role performance: A two-wave study. Personnel Review, 48(5), 1186-1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2018-0133
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Harvard Business Review Press.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x
Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.932
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row.
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. HarperBusiness.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (1998). The character of a corporation: How your company's culture can make or break your business. Harper Business.
Gupta, A. K., & Singhal, A. (1993). Managing human resources for innovation and creativity. Research-Technology Management, 36(3), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1993.11670915
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behavior and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co‐workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647210
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Corporate entrepreneurs at work. Simon & Schuster.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. Innovation and Creativity at Work, 1(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/256685
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069410
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
