Management Of Class II Malocclusion In A Post-pubertal Patient with A Modified Fixed Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Therapy: A Case Report
Keywords:
N\A, N\AAbstract
Functional appliances have long been employed in the management of skeletal Class II malocclusions, with their primary objective being to stimulate mandibular growth by enhancing growth activity at the condylar cartilage. Among the myofunctional appliances, the Twin Block appliance is one of the most widely used due to its effectiveness and patient compliance. The aim of this paper is to present a case report of mandibular deficiency treatment with modified Fixed Twin Block appliance in a female patient whose sexual maturation (one year after menarche) and cervical vertebral maturation stage assessment indicated the end of peak pubertal growth .
Diagnosis revealed an Angle’s Class II malocclusion with an orthognathic maxilla, retrognathic mandible, horizontal growth pattern, recessive chin, and a convex facial profile. Phase I treatment was carried out using a modified fixed twin block appliance, which improved mandibular growth, facial balance. This was followed by a support phase with a Rick-A-nator and subsequently Phase II fixed mechanotherapy using 0.022 in MBT prescription. Post- treatment, the patient exhibited improved skeletal relationship and a harmonious soft tissue profile and Class I relationship with normal overjet and overbite was achieved.
Downloads
References
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(2):128–137.
Mills JR. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod. 1991;18(4):267–275.
Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update. 1998;25(7):302–308.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(2):159–170.
Nanda RS. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms. Am J Orthod. 1955;41(9):658–673.
Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42(1):400–411.
Hunter CJ. The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1966;36(1):44–54.
Ekström C. Facial growth rate and its relation to somatic maturation in healthy children. Swed Dent J. 1982;11(Suppl 15):1–99.
Lewis AB, Roche AF, Wagner B. Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible: comparisons within individuals. Angle Orthod. 1985;55(1):17–30.
Hägg U, Pancherz H, Taranger J. Pubertal growth and orthodontic treatment. In: Carlson DS, Ribbens KA, eds. Craniofacial Growth during Adolescence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan; 1987.
Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2014.
Houston WJB, Stephens CD, Tulley WJ. A Textbook of Orthodontics. Wright, Bristol, UK; 1992.
Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104(4):319–329.
Patel D, Parekh H, Gupta B, Purl T. Class II malocclusion treatment using combined Twin Block and fixed orthodontic appliances—a case report. Int J Orthod. 2014;25(4):51–55.
Harradine NWT, Gale D. The effects of torque control spurs in twin-block appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2000;3(4):202–209.
Little RM. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod. 1999;5(3):191–204..
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.