Evaluation of The Maki Method and Sonication for Diagnosing Catheter-Related Infections in ICU Patients with Long-Term Central Venous Catheters
Keywords:
Catheter-related infections (CRIs), Central venous catheters (CVCs), Maki method, Sonication, ICU diagnosticsAbstract
Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in clinical settings but are associated with the risk of catheter-related infections (CRIs), including catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). The detection of catheter tip colonization is critical for diagnosing CRIs. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Maki semiquantitative method and sonication, both individually and in combination, for detecting catheter tip colonization and CRBSIs in ICU patients.
Methods: We conducted a study involving 87 ICU patients with CVCs in place for at least 7 days, which were removed due to suspected CRIs. The diagnosis of CRI was based on the development of sepsis or fever, with the Sepsis-3 Consensus Criteria applied. Catheter tip samples were collected and analyzed using the Maki semiquantitative method and sonication, both separately and in combination. Blood cultures were not collected from patients. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Cohen’s Kappa test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the diagnostic performance.
Results: Of the 94 CVCs analyzed, 23 blood stream infections (BSIs) were identified, with 10 (43.5%) diagnosed as CRBSIs and 13 (56.5%) as bloodstream infections of unknown origin (BSIUOs). The Maki method identified 7 (50%) of the 14 cases of catheter tip colonization, while sonication detected 1 (7.1%) case independently. The combination of Maki and sonication detected 7 (50%) cases. For diagnosing CRBSIs, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the combined method was 98%, higher than Maki alone (79%). The combination of methods did not significantly outperform Maki alone for detecting CRBSIs (p=0.32). A false-negative rate of 1.1% was found with Maki and sonication for catheter tip colonization.
Conclusion: The Maki method outperformed sonication for detecting both catheter tip colonization and CRBSIs in ICU patients with short-term CVCs. Sonication, although more effective for long-term colonization, did not significantly improve diagnostic performance when used in conjunction with Maki. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate diagnostic methods based on catheter duration and the patient population, with Maki being a reliable and efficient method for routine clinical diagnostics in ICU settings.
Downloads
References
Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. (1994). Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 271(20), 1598-601.
Laupland KB, Lee H, Gregson DB, Manns BJ. (2006). Cost of intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections. J Hosp Infect., 63(2), 124-32.
Siempos II, Kopterides P, Tsangaris I, Dimopoulou I, Armaganidis AE. (2009). Impact of catheter-related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 37(7), 2283-9.
Lambert ML, Suetens C, Savey A, Palomar M, Hiesmayr M, Morales I, (2011). Clinical outcomes of health-care-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients admitted to European intensive-care units: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 11(1), 30-8.
Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. (1977), A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med. 296(23), 1305-9.
Cleri DJ, Corrado ML, Seligman SJ.(1980). Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis. 141(6), 781-6.
Linares J, Sitges-Serra A, Garau J, Perez L, Martin R. (1985). Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments. J Clin Micro-biol. 21(3), 357-60.
Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M (1987). Diagnosis of central venous catheter–related sepsis: critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med. 147(5), 873-7.
Sherertz RJ, Raad II, Belani A, Koo LC, Rand KH, Pickett DL. (1990). Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 28(1), 76-82.
Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcalá L, Sánchez-Conde M, Pérez MJ, Muñoz P, (2005). A prospective, randomized, and comparative study of 3 different methods for the diagnosis of intravascular catheter colonization. Clin Infect Dis., 40(8), 1096-100.
Slobbe L, El Barzouhi A, Boersma E, Rijnders BJ. (2009). Comparison of the roll plate method to the sonication method to diagnose catheter colonization and bacteremia in patients with long-term tunnelled catheters: a randomized prospective study. J Clin Microbiol. 47(4), 885-8.
Erb S, Frei R, Schregenberger K, Dangel M, Nogarth D, Widmer AF. (2014). Sonication for diagnosis of catheter-related infection is not better than traditional roll-plate culture: a prospective cohort study with 975 central venous catheters. Clin Infect Dis. 59(4), 541-4.
Guembe M, Martín-Rabadán P, Cruces R, Pérez Granda MJ, Bouza E. (2016). Sonicating multi-lumen sliced catheter tips after the roll-plate technique improves the detection of catheter colonization in adults. J Microbiol Methods. 122, 20-2.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 315(8), 801-10.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. (1980). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837-45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.