CFD Simulation of Scram Jet Inlet

Authors

  • Letu Teja
  • P. Dasu

Keywords:

N\A

Abstract

In order to provide the definition of a scramjet engine, the definition of a ramjet engine is first necessary, as a scramjet engine is a direct descendant of a ramjet engine. Ramjet engines have no moving parts, instead operating on compression to slow free stream supersonic air to subsonic speeds, thereby increasing temperature and pressure, and then combusting the compressed air with fuel. Lastly, a nozzle accelerates the exhaust to supersonic speeds, resulting in thrust. Due to the deceleration of the free stream air, the pressure, temperature and density of the flow entering the burner are “considerably higher than in the free stream”. At flight Mach numbers of around Mach 6, these increases make it inefficient to continue to slow the flow to subsonic speeds. In this thesis, generally a Scramjet Engine starts at a hypersonic frees Stream Mach no. 5.00. In order to propel to those speeds, we use turbojet engines which propel to around 3.00-4.00 Mach and from there the ramjet picks upon and starts to propel to start the scramjet engine. If we increasing the scramjet engine starting Mach number to say 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0. We can eliminate one propulsion engine, i.e., ramjet engine and thus reducing weight and complexity. The design for such a scramjet engine is carried out in this project considering only the inlet designs and the flow analysis is carried out in CFD. FLUENT is used to cover the flow analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aqheel Murutuza Siddiquin and G.M. Sayeed Ahmed,Design and Analysis of a Scramjet engine Inlet International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3,Issue 1, January 2013 1 ISSN 2250-3153.

Amjad A. Pasha and Krishnendu Sinha, Simulation of Hypersonic Shock/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions Using Shock-Unsteadiness Model, Journal of Propulsion and Power Vol. 28, No. 1, January–February 2012.

Ramesh kolleru and Vijay Gopal Comparative Numerical Studies of Scramjet Inlet Performance using k-ε TurbulenceModel with Adaptive Grids COMSOL conference Bangalore2012.

Derek J. Dalle_, Sean M. Torrezy, and James F. Driscoll Performance Analysis of Variable-Geometry Scramjet InletsUsing a Low-Order Model 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 31 July - 03 August2011, San Diego, California.

Krishnendu Sinha, Computational Fluid Dynamics inHypersonic Aerothermodynamics, Defence Science Journal ,Vol. 60, No. 6, November 2010, pp. 663-671, 2010.

S. Das and J. K. Prasad, Cowl Deflection Angle in a Supersonic Air Intake, Defence Science Journal, Vol. 59, No.2, March 2009, pp. 99-105, 2009.

Kristen Nicole Roberts Analysis and Design of a hypersonic Scramjet engine with a starting Mach number of 4.00, Matersthesis, The university of Texas at Arlington, August 2008.

R. Sivakumar and V. Babu, Numerical Simulations of Flowin a 3-D Supersonic Intake at High Mach Numbers, Defence Science Journal, Vol. 56, No. 4, October 2006, pp. 465-476,2006.

Donde Pratik Prakash, Hypersonic Intake studies, Master’s Thesis, Indian Institute of technology, Bombay, July 2006.

M. Krause, B. Reinartz, J. Ballmann, “Numerical Computations for designing a Scramjet intake, 25thInternational conference of Aeronautical Sciences 2006.

Michael K. Smart and Carl A. Trexler, Mach 4 Performance of a Fixed-Geometry Hypersonic Inlet with Rectangular-to-Elliptical Shape Transition, AIAA – 2003-0012.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

1.
Teja L, Dasu P. CFD Simulation of Scram Jet Inlet. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.24 [cited 2025Jul.20];14(32S):1786-95. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7658