Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Fiber-Reinforced and Stress-Decreasing Composites: A Comparative In-Vitro Analysis
Keywords:
N/AAbstract
Background: Endodontically treated teeth often suffer from diminished fracture resistance due to structural alterations such as moisture loss, dentin dehydration, and access cavity preparation. Selecting suitable core build-up materials is crucial for restoring their strength and ensuring long-term functionality.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with fiber-reinforced composite (GC EverX Flow) and stress-decreasing resin composite (Dentsply SDR), using both occlusal and mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity preparations.
Methodology: Forty-nine freshly extracted maxillary premolars were divided into seven groups based on cavity design and restorative material. After standardized endodontic treatment, core build-up was done using either GC EverX Flow or SDR. Fracture resistance testing was performed using a universal testing machine, and data were analysed using ANOVA and post hoc comparisons.
Results: The highest mean fracture resistance was observed in the control group (721.14 N), followed by Dentsply SDR in MOD preparations (613.21 N), and GC EverX Flow in MOD (583.86 N). MOD groups with no restorative material showed the lowest resistance (337.29 N). Statistical analysis confirmed that both GC EverX and SDR composites significantly enhanced fracture resistance compared to unrestored controls, especially in MOD cavities.
Conclusion: Fiber-reinforced and stress-decreasing composites effectively reinforce endodontically treated teeth, especially in structurally compromised MOD designs. SDR exhibited slightly superior performance, suggesting its clinical advantage in restoring weakened teeth. These findings guide clinicians in selecting optimal restorative materials to enhance durability and reduce the risk of post-treatment fracture.
Downloads
References
Adanir, N., Belli, S., & Yildirim, C. (2006). Evaluation of different post and core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Endodontics, 32(8), 727–730.
Belli, S., Erdemir, A., & Yildirim, C. (2006). Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: Comparison of two restoration techniques. International Endodontic Journal, 39(2), 136–142.
Bitter, K., Kielbassa, A. M., & Neumann, K. (2015). Influence of core material and post length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dental Traumatology, 31(3), 203–209.
Choi, Y., Bae, J. M., Kim, M. H., & Huh, J. B. (2006). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. Journal of Prosthodontics, 15(1), 26–31.
Faria, A. C. L., Rodrigues, R. C. S., de Almeida Antunes, R. P., de Mattos, M. G. C., & Ribeiro, R. F. (2007). Endodontically treated teeth: Characteristics and considerations to restore them. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 51(1), 10–15.
Forster, A., Braunitzer, G., Toth, M., & Szabo, G. Y. (2014). Fracture toughness of different core build-up materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 112(6), 1481–1487.
Goracci, C., Raffaelli, O., & Ferrari, M. (2004). Role of glass fiber posts in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17(6), 607–612.
Gupta, A., Kaur, M., & Bansal, M. (2020). Post-endodontic restoration in posterior teeth: A review and clinical perspective. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 13(6), 627–633.
Juloski, J., Radovic, I., & Goracci, C. (2012). Ferrule effect: A literature review. Journal of Endodontics, 38(1), 11–19.
Kimble, E. A., Mjör, I. A., & Clark, D. J. (2023). Effect of biomimetic training on restorative decisions in general practice. Operative Dentistry, 48(1), 48–55.
Yang B, Ludwig K, Schmage P. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems and composite resin cores. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(6):426–35.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):321–8.
Samran A, Al-Afandi M, Alsadon O, Al-Ahdal K, Al-Aali KA, Alrabiah M, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(5):378–85.
Pereira JR, do Valle AL, Ghizoni JS, Lorenzoni FC, dos Reis So MV, Erhardt MC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post-and-cores or fiber posts and resin core. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):E121–9.
Forster A, Braunitzer G, Tóth Á, Nagy K. Fracture toughness of packable and flowable dental composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30(2):165–72.
Soares CJ, Faria AC, Carneiro KG, Celiberti P, Galhano GA, Martins LR. Effect of cavity design and restorative technique on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1130–6.
Silva GR, Santos-Filho PCF, Simamoto Júnior PC, Martins LRM, Muench A. Effect of post type and placement technique on fracture resistance of roots restored with composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(2):153–7.
Kimble KM, Dougherty S, Desai H, Pileggi R. Influence of biomimetic restorative decision-making on fracture resistance of ETT: An observational study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(2):367–73.
Selvaraj S, Krishnamurthy A, Subramanian V. Comparative evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite versus conventional composites for core build-up in ETT: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2023;26(1):5–12.
Clark DJ, Khademi JA, Herbranson E. Fracture resistance of ETT restored with nanocomposite resins. Oper Dent. 2024;49(1):47–54.
Martinez M, Correr AB, Gonzaga CC, Campos EA, Barceleiro MO, Morita PP. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with CAD/CAM-fabricated endocrowns versus post-and-core systems. J Prosthodont Res. 2024;68(2):175–81.
Zhou Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhang Q. Effect of zirconia-reinforced composite resin on fracture resistance of ETT: An in vitro study. Dent Mater J. 2024;43(1):25–32.
Gher ME, Dunlap RM, Anderson MH, Kuhl LV. Clinical survey of fractured teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125(3):387–90.
Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):431–7.
Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary? J Endod. 2008;34(8):1006–10.
Cheung W, Zheng J, Zhang Y, Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Load-bearing capacity of endodontically treated premolars with variable post-core systems. Dent Mater. 2005;21(12):1068–76.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
