Retrospective Evaluation of Prolene Suture Complications in the Cartilage-Sparing techniques of otoplasty Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.7505Keywords:
Otoplasty, Prolene sutures, Cartilage-Sparing techniques, Hematoma, ComplicationsAbstract
Background: Otoplasty, a cosmetic surgery aimed at correcting prominent ears, is influenced by the choice of suture material. Prolene sutures, which are non-absorbable and durable, are commonly used in otoplasty techniques. This study aims to investigate the complication rates associated with Prolene sutures when using the Cartilage-Sparing techniques.
Methods: This retrospective study focuses on data retrieved from Najran University Hospital between 2023 and 2024. The inclusion criteria included patients aged 5 years and above, with a minimum 3-month follow-up, who underwent otoplasty for prominent ears using Cartilage-Sparing techniques with Prolene suture. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: Among the 34 participants (mean age 16.53 ± 11.31 years), there were 9 females (26.5%) and 25 males (73.5%). The mean follow-up duration was 10.38 ± 22.9 months. Of the participants, 94.1% had no complications, while 2.9% experienced hematoma, and 2.9% had suture extrusion. No significant associations were found with age, sex and laterality. However, follow-up duration showed a significant association with complications (p = 0.016).
Conclusions: Prolene sutures demonstrated minimal complications in otoplasty using the Cartilage-Sparing techniques. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up are recommended to confirm these results and assess long-term outcomes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Kennedy KL, Katrib Z. Otoplasty. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; July 3, 2023.
Songu M, Hathiram BT, Khattar VS. The surgical technique of otoplasty. The international atlas of operative ENT and head & neck surgery. New Delhi: Jaypee. 2013:3-21.
Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, van der Molen AM, Kon M. Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. JJPRAS. 2009 Jan 1;62(1):19-27.
Malhotra K, Bondje S, Sklavounos A, Mortada H, Khajuria A. Absorbable versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Facial Skin Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Aesthetic Outcomes. Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Jun 19;51(4):386-396.
Handler EB, Song T, Shih C. Complications of otoplasty. FPCS Clin North Am. 2013 Nov 1;21(4):653-62.
Maslauskas K, Astrauskas T, Viksraitis S, Samsanavidius D. Comparison of otoplasty outcomes using different types of suture materials. Int. Surg. 2010 Jan 1;95(1):88-93.
Dart AJ, Dart CM. Suture material: conventional and stimuli responsive. In: Ducheyne P, ed. Comprehensive Biomaterials II. Vol 7. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2017:746-771.
Sayeed B, Hashmi KS, Qamar SA. Wound Complications: Comparison of Non-Absorbable Suture (Prolene) with Absorbable Suture (Vicryl) In Terms Of Wound Complications and Cosmesis. TPMJ. 2019 May 10;26(05):753-8.
Hilger P, Khosh MM, Nishioka G, Larrabee WF. Modification of the Mustardé otoplasty technique using temporary contouring sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Nov 1;100(6):1585-6.
Songu M. Combined Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty: the experience of 85 patients. ENT Updates. 2013 Dec 1;3(3):129.
Abdilkarim DA, Qader AR, Mohammed SA. The Effectiveness of Posturicular Fascial Flap as an Adjunct to Suture Otoplasty. KJAR. 2016 Mar 1;1(1):35-49.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants. JAMA. 2025;333(1):71–74. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.21972
Boroditsky ML, Van Slyke AC, Arneja JS. Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3103.
Bulstrode NW, Ronde EM, Mazeed AS. Further Refinements in Otoplasty Surgery: a modified approach to prevent suture extrusion in cartilage-suturing otoplasty using a postauricular dermofascial flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 7.
El-Meleigy Ma, Abozeid Mustardé and Furnas , Ibrahim Naguib Rizk Md, Abd El-Ghany Sa. Otoplasty; Comparing Different Surgical Techniques. 2015;39 (1):115-122
Senirli RT. Apical Set-Back, A Simple Modification of Mustardé-Furnas Technique Otoplasty. Acta Medica Nicomedia. 2024 Oct 10;7(3):268-73.
Foda HM. Otoplasty: a graduated approach. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 1999 Nov;23(6):407-12.
Raposo A, Calero J, Guilllén A, Giribet A, Barrios A, García-Purriños F. Suture material utilised influences suture extrusion rate in otoplasty: A non-randomised retrospective single-centre study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Sep 1;72(9):1576-606.
Alzayadneh I, Glikson E, Shapiro J, Rival E, Solomon Z, Solomon P. Utilization of free soft tissue grafts in otoplasty: a simple yet effective way to avoid suture extrusion. Aesthet. Surg. J 2022 Sep 1;42(9):NP571-5.
Salter E, Goh B, Hung B, Hutton D, Ghone N, Grayson WL. Bone tissue engineering bioreactors: a role in the clinic?. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2012 Feb 1;18(1):62-75
Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):219-29.
Gilleard O, Walsh K, King I, Tsang C, Rahman S, Dheansa B. Evaluation of a new suture otoplasty technique. JPRAS Open. 2016 Mar 1;7:16-8.
Calder JC, Naasan A: Morbidity of otoplasty: A review of 562 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg 1994;47(3):170-174.
Toplu Y, Sapmaz E, Toplu SA, Deliktas H. Otoplasty: results of suturing and scoring techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 271(7):1885-1889.
Ahmed M, Alkhalaf H, Ibrahim E. Helix free otoplasty for correction of prominent ear. Asian J. Surg. 2019 May 1;42(5):621-7.
ALENCAR EC, LUCENA JR, CARVALHO FILHO RA, OLIVEIRA KP, ALMEIDA CL. Surgical correction of prominent ears: association of the Furnas and Mustardé techniques. RBCP. 2023 May 29;30:439-45.
El-Lamei KK, Helal HA, Al-Aziz A, Hanafy AA, Al-Badawy MA. Combined otoplasty technique utilizing posterior scoring of the auricular cartilage for correction of prominent ears. Ain-Shams J. Surg. 2011 Jan 1;4(1):155-6
Duran A, Cörtük O, Eroğlu S. Prominent Ear Correction: Three Flap Technique Combined with Conventional Otoplasty. Turk J Plast Surg. 2023 Apr 1;31(2):55-60
Caouette Laberge L, Guay N, Bortoluzzi P, et al: Otoplasty: Anterior scoring technique and results in 500 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (2): 504-515.
Jeffery SL: Complications following correction of prominent ears: An audit review of 122 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(7):588-590
Kuşcu O, Önay Ö, Günaydın RÖ, Yılmaz T. Otoplasty outcomes and results: does Furnas setback suture affect complication rates. Turk Arch Otolaryngol. 2014 Jun 1;52 (2):52-56.
Edafe O, Argyriou K, Thevasagayam MS. Outcomes and complications of incisionless otoplasty–A retrospective observational study and a review of the literature. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct 1;137 (110246): 1-5.
S. Mehta, A. Gantous, Incisionless otoplasty: a reliable and replicable technique for the correction of Prominent ears, JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 16 (6): 414–418
Morris, M. T., & Mundy, L. (2006). Otoplasty: A review of the surgical technique and complications.JAAD, 54(4), 697-701.
O'Connor, T. F., & Fernandes, A. (2015). Hemorrhagic complications in otoplasty: a review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg, 135(5), 977-984.
Al Subhi F. Case Report: Unusual Complication Post Otoplasty. Mod. Plast. Surg. 2017 Dec 12;8(01):1.
Borges FV, Boechat CE, Chedid R, Amaral RF, Vans RL. Complications of otoplasty surgeries. RBCP. 2023 May 29;31:203-8.
Dobrin PB, Gosselin C, Kang S, Mrkvicka R. Effect of pulsatile pressure on the breaking strength and movement of Prolene sutures. J Vasc Surg. 1997 Dec;26(6):1029-35.
Khanal N, Thapa A, Raut A, Ghimire B, Pradhan S, Shrestha S. Intra-abdominal propylene suture fragment leading to complete small bowel obstruction: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Aug;85(106174); 1-3.
Celeste C. Selection of suture materials, suture patterns, and drains for wound closure. EWM. 2016 Nov 28:173-99.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
