Application Of Alexander Principle ‘Driftodontics’ Mechanics To 1st Premolar Extraction Cases Compared To 1st Premolar Extraction Cases Treated with Conventional MBT System- An Assessment

Authors

  • Neelam Dhakar
  • Purva Joneja
  • Samvit Mishra
  • Maitreye Priyadarshini
  • Shwetneel
  • Sameen Faraz

Keywords:

Driftodontics, Crowding, 1st Premolar Extraction, Mandibular anterior, Root resorption, Mobility

Abstract

Background- Inspite of the tremendous improvements in technology that allow for fewer patients to require extractions, there are always patients who have significant enough crowding that ultimately necessitate the removal of premolars. Alleviating the lower anterior crowding prior to placement of the fixed appliances shortens the time in braces, and allows self correction by natural drift. One such treatment strategy which allows all this is Driftodontics. Potential benefits from a period of physiologic dental drift post-extraction, was proposed by Bourdet. “Driftodontics” is a term that can be attributed to Dr. R.G. “Wick” Alexander in his textbook. The benefits include shorter period of fixed appliance therapy because of unprompted alignment of the teeth, oral hygiene problems due to appliance therapy decreases because of less time period of appliance in the oral cavity and the dentoalveolar support also increases.

Objective-

1.To measure and compare the apical root resorption in mandibular anterior teeth in 1st premolar extraction cases selected on the basis of anterior crowding irregularity index  treated with Driftodontics and MBT system cases (Angle’s class 1, class 2 division 1and class 2 division 2 malocclusions).

  1. To compute and compare the clinical mobility in mandibular anterior teeth in 1st premolar extraction cases treated with Driftodontics and MBT system cases.

3.To calculate and compare the total number of appointments and overall chairside time taken in both study groups.

Methodology- This is an In-vivo and In-vitro cross-sectional study with examination which includes the measurement of apical root resorption in mandibular anterior teeth on IOPAs (RVGs) by using modified Lind’s method and measuring the mobility of mandibular anterior teeth based on Miller’s mobility index on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with  

 

driftodontics from alexander principles and conventional MBT system. Data is collected by taking Pretreatment and Post-retraction records and also by recording the number of appointments as well as chair side time.

Result-

The t-value (6.903) and p-value (0.000)* indicate a statistically significant difference, showing that Driftodontics required fewer appointments than Conventional MBT.

The p-values for all teeth were below 0.05, confirming statistically significant differences in root resorption, showing reduced root resorption in driftodontics than conventional MBT.

p-values for mobility being statistically significant (ranging from 0.007 to 0.034)**. This indicates that Conventional MBT causes significantly more post-treatment tooth mobility compared to Driftodontics, reinforcing that Driftodontics provides a more stable post-treatment outcome.

Conclusion- This study suggests that Driftodontics may provide a more efficient treatment approach, reducing the burden on patients in terms of time and frequency of visits, more comfortable, reduce dentoalveolar stress, showing reduced root resorption, decreased post retraction mobility and shows more stable post retraction outcome. Hence, the study shows that Driftodontics is more advantageous and comfortable than Conventional MBT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tweed C. Clinical Orthodontics. St.Louis: C. V. Mosby Co, 1966.

AlexanderRG. The Alexander Discipline. Glendora, CA: Ormco Corporation, 1986.

Creekmore, TD. Teeth want to be straight. J Clin Orthod 1982;82:745-764.

Bourdet M. Researches et Observations Sur toutesles parties de L’art du Dentiste, Paris, 1957.

Cookson A. Space closure following loss of lower first premolars. Dent Prac 1971;21:411-16.

Dale JG. Chapter 5 In:Graber Tj, Swain BF, editors. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques, St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co, 1985.

Wager LE. Preorthodontic guidance and the corrective mixed-dentiton concept. Am J- Orthod 1976;69:1-12.

StephensCD. The rate of spontaneous closure at the site of extracted mandibular first premolars. Brit J Orthod 1983;10-93-97.

Campbell-WilsonM. Preliminary investigation into the movement of the lower labial segment following loss of the first premolars. Brit J Orthod 1975;2:2-28.

Chun YS. Physiologic drift of the mandibular dentition following the extraction of four first premolars. The korean journal of orthodontics. 1996;26(1):33-41.

Papandreas, S.G.; Buschang, P.H.; Alexander, R.G.; Kennedy, D.B.; and Koyama, I.: Physiologic drift of the mandibular dentition following first premolar extractions, Angle Orthod. 63:127-134, 1993.

Alexander CD, Alexander JM. Facebow correction of skeletal Class II discrepancies in the Alexander Discipline. Semin Orthod. 2001; 7(2): 80–84

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

1.
Dhakar N, Joneja P, Mishra S, Priyadarshini M, Shwetneel S, Faraz S. Application Of Alexander Principle ‘Driftodontics’ Mechanics To 1st Premolar Extraction Cases Compared To 1st Premolar Extraction Cases Treated with Conventional MBT System- An Assessment. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.19 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(21S):1596-602. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7496