Primary Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) Fixation in Compound Long Bone Fracture
Keywords:
Compound Long Bone Fractures, Limb Reconstruction System (LRS), Asami Score, Bone Stability, Functional Mobility, Statistical AnalysisAbstract
Background: Compound long bone fractures pose significant challenges due to high risks of infection, non-union, and severe soft tissue damage. Choosing an optimal fixation method is crucial for improving outcomes. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) as the primary fixation method for these fractures, using the Asami score criteria to assess pain, function, and bone stability.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with compound long bone fractures. Fracture conditions were simulated, and LRS was applied as the primary fixation method. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using the Asami criteria, focusing on bone stability, functional mobility, and pain relief. Statistical analysis was performed to compare LRS with alternative fixation methods, such as the Ilizarov frame, in terms of infection rates, weight-bearing capacity, and patient compliance.
Results: LRS demonstrated significant improvements in all postoperative outcome measures. Patients exhibited enhanced bone stability, better functional mobility, and effective pain relief. LRS was associated with lower infection rates and facilitated early weight-bearing compared to the Ilizarov frame, which is more complex to apply and may reduce patient compliance. Additionally, complication rates were low, with manageable issues such as pin tract infections.
Conclusion: The study reinforces previous findings on LRS as a viable, patient-friendly, and cost-effective treatment for complex fractures, particularly in resource-limited settings. LRS offers a reliable alternative to traditional fixation methods, ensuring improved recovery and early mobilization. Further long-term studies are recommended to establish LRS as the standard treatment for high-risk fractures in orthopedic trauma care.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Patil MY, Gupta SM, Kurupati SKC, Agarwal S, Chandarana V. Definitive Management of Open Tibia Fractures Using Limb Reconstruction System. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(7):RC01-RC4. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17978.8124
Alhammoud A, Maaz B, Alhaneedi GA, Alnouri M. External fixation for primary and definitive management of open long bone fractures: the Syrian war experience. Int Orthop. 2019;43(12):2661-2670. doi:10.1007/s00264-019-04314-0
Gill SPS, Raj M, Kumar S, et al. Early Conversion of External Fixation to Interlocked Nailing in Open Fractures of Both Bone Leg Assisted with Vacuum Closure (VAC) - Final Outcome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2):RC10-RC14. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17612.7265
Kushwaha NS, Mahendra M, Kumar S, Sinha S, Singh A, Sharma V. Infected Non Union of Tibia Managed by Limb Reconstruction System- A Prospective Cohort Study. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. Published online 2020. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2020/44173.14030
RISKA EB, BONSDORFF HVON, HAKKINEN S, JAROMA H, KIVILUOTO O, PAAVILAINEN T. PRIMARY OPERATIVE FIXATION OF LONG BONE FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 1977;17(2):111-121. doi:10.1097/00005373-197702000-00005
Barrack RL, Butler RA, Andrews P, Rorabeck CH, Engh G. Problems Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Managing the Infected Knee: As Good as It Gets. Orthopedics. 2000;23(9):991-992. doi:10.3928/0147-7447-20000901-33
Kapila R, Kumar Arora K, Singh R, Mittal M, Singh S. LRS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ILIZAROV IN FRACTURES LONG BONES WITH SUBSTATIAL BONE LOSS. Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2018;8(12):217-224. doi:10.15520/IJMHS.V8I12.2370
Yadav R, Mittal V, Uppal A, et al. To evaluate the outcome of vacuum assisted closure in open fractures of tibia. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery. 2022;8(1):49-52. doi:10.18231/j.ijos.2022.008
Pal CP, Kumar H, Kumar D, Dinkar KS, Mittal V, Singh NK. Comparative study of the results of compound tibial shaft fractures treated by Ilizarov ring fixators and limb reconstruction system fixators. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2015;18(6):347-351. doi:10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.08.006
Natarajan M, Nagaraj C, Selvaraj R, Pasupathy B, Raj A, Sankarlingam P. Management of periarticular fractures of long bones of the lower extremity by hybrid external fixation. Indian J Orthop. 2006;40(3):177. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.34487
Barbhuiya SA, Mohanta K, Bharali T. A prospective study on the role of limb reconstruction System in infective non-union of femur and tibia. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences. 2022;8(1):672-676. doi:10.22271/ortho.2022.v8.i1i.3085
HORTON TC, HATTON M, DAVIS TRC. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Fixation of Long Oblique and Spiral Shaft Fractures of the Proximal Phalanx: Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Kirschner Wiring Versus Open Reduction and Lag Screw Fixation. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2003;28(1):5-9. doi:10.1054/jhsb.2002.0807
Landes C, Ballon A, Ghanaati S, Tran A, Sader R. Treatment of Malar and Midfacial Fractures With Osteoconductive Forged Unsintered Hydroxyapatite and Poly-L-Lactide Composite Internal Fixation Devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(7):1328-1338. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.02.027
Gajbhiye AI, Goyal S, Mohan Kumar M, Dorai Kumar R. Outcomes of mono-lateral limb reconstruction system in infected non-union of long bones. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;4(1):27. doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20175497
Loya DrLS, Hugar DrSM. A study of management of non union of long bone fractures by limb reconstruction system. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences. 2022;8(1):271-277. doi:10.22271/ortho.2022.v8.i1d.3027
Garg P, Bajpai T, Saxena R. Management of fracture non-union long bones by limb reconstruction devices. Asian J Med Sci. 2022;13(9):188-191. doi:10.3126/ajms.v13i9.41052
Biswas R, Banerjee M, Roy A. Prospective evaluation of the role of limb reconstruction system in fracture non-union of femur: a case series. Int J Res Orthop. 2023;9(2):422-426. doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20230474
Sharma B, Kumar Shakunt R, Patel J, Pal CP. Outcome of limb reconstruction system in tibial infected non-union and open tibial diaphysial fracture with bone loss. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;15:136-138. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.008
Mangukiya HJ, Mahajan NP, Pawar ED, Mane A, Manna J. Functional and radiological outcome in management of compound tibia diaphyseal fracture with AO monolateral fixator versus Limb reconstruction system. J Orthop. 2018;15(1):275-281. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.041
Kale AB, Patole VV, Argekar HG, Sharan S, Goregaonkar AB. Limb reconstruction system as a primary and definitive mode of fixation in open fractures of long bones. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(2):167. doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20170019
Arfee S, Malik AT, Nehru A, Ali U, Arfee A, Arfee AA. Clinicoradiological Comparison of Outcomes of LRS Fixator and Ilizarov in Infected Nonunion of Tibia Based on Bone Gap Quantification: An Original Research. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022;14(Suppl 1):S295-S297. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_757_21
Lone AH, Bhat AN, Rather AA, Maajid S, Khan K. A comparative study of Ilizarov ring fixators and limb reconstruction system fixators in the treatment of compound tibial shaft fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2023;9(6):1201-1206. doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20233264
Shah Josal S Patel MN. Volume : 6 | Issue : 2 | FEBRUARY. Published online 2016.
Patra SR, Kisan D, Madharia D, et al. Management of infected non-unions of long bones using limb reconstruction system (LRS) fixator. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(2):213. doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20170540
Bakshi AS, Singh A, Kaur H, Kaur G, Singh J. A Comparative Study of Treatment With External Fixator Versus Antibiotic Coated Intramedullary Nail in Infected Non-union Long Bones. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29659-e29659. doi:10.7759/cureus.29659
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
