Expanding the Forensic Use of the Acid Phosphatase Test: Rapid Detection of Saliva, Earwax, and Sweat under varied Environmental Conditions

Authors

  • Geeta Gupta
  • Sanskriti Saini

Keywords:

Acid Phosphatase test, Saliva, Ear wax, Sweat, Forensic Screening

Abstract

The Acid Phosphatase (AP) test has long been used in forensic investigations to detect semen, but this study shows that it can also identify saliva, earwax, and sweat, making it a potentially more versatile tool. We analysed how AP activity responds in different body fluids under various conditions, including temperature changes (-20ºC, 4ºC, room temperature(+25ºC)) and exposure to humidity, dryness, and UV light, effect of surfaces absorbent Vs. non-absorbent for over 30 days. The results revealed that saliva and earwax produce an immediate reaction, making them easy to detect. Sweat also shows a positive result, but it takes more than a minute to appear. Even after long-term exposure to different environmental conditions, saliva and earwax samples continued to react instantly, demonstrating the durability of AP activity. We also found that cold temperatures help to preserve AP activity, while hot, dry conditions cause it to fade faster. The type of surface also matters—absorbent surface holds onto AP activity better than non-absorbent surfaces like glass, making it more useful in forensic evidence collection. These findings suggest that the AP test could be used for more than just semen detection, as it provides a rapid, reliable, and widely applicable forensic tool for detecting multiple biological fluids, thereby improving crime scene investigations and evidence analysis. However, since several fluids can test positive, forensic investigators should further confirm the results using more specific tests such as immunochromatography based approach or mRNA analysis, especially in sensitive cases like sexual assault investigations. This study highlights the need to further explore the forensic potential of the Acid Phosphatase (AP) test beyond semen detection, particularly in identifying and preserving other biological fluids like saliva, earwax, and sweat. Additionally, developing standardized protocols for field applications can improve its effectiveness in crime scene investigations and forensic evidence collection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, K. A., et al. (2020). Forensic DNA recovery from non-traditional sources. Journal of Forensic Identification, 70(5), 305–320.

Butler, J. M. (2011). Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: Methodology. Elsevier.

Cooper, C. (2017). Forensic applications of biochemical markers. Elsevier.

Core.ac.uk. (2023). A bioanalytical approach to forensic body fluid identification. Retrieved from https://www.core.ac.uk

Forensic Science International. (2023). Detection of enzymes in biological fluids for forensic application. Forensic Science International, 329, 110987.

Harris, D. C. (2015). Quantitative chemical analysis. W. H. Freeman.

International Association for Identification (IAI). (2022). Best practices for forensic screening of bodily fluids.

International Journal of Legal Medicine. (2023). Presumptive and confirmatory testing in forensic science.

Journal of Analytical Toxicology. (2022). Detection of biological fluids in toxicological analysis.

Journal of Forensic Identification. (2021). Effectiveness of acid phosphatase tests for crime scene investigation.

Journal of Forensic Research. (2022). Expanding the use of enzyme-based assays in forensic science.

Kobilinsky, L. (2018). Forensic DNA analysis of trace biological evidence. Academic Press.

Lewis, S. W., et al. (2021). Optimization of presumptive tests for bodily fluids. Forensic Chemistry, 14(3), 201–213.

Liu, H., et al. (2016). Comparative analysis of forensic screening methods for body fluids. Science & Justice, 56(2), 85–92.

Madi, T., et al. (2018). The use of RNA in forensic analysis of body fluids. Legal Medicine, 30(4), 177–185.

McDermott, S. D., et al. (2021). Challenges in detecting sweat as forensic evidence. Journal of Criminalistics, 48(5), 259–270.

National Forensic Science Technology Center (NFSTC). (2020). Biological evidence preservation handbook.

PMC. (2017, March 24). Earwax as an alternative specimen for forensic analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/

PMC. (2017). Saliva in forensic odontology: A comprehensive update. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/

Raymond, M. A., et al. (2017). Colorimetric tests for enzymatic detection in forensic investigations. Analytical Chemistry, 89(12), 6124–6132.

ResearchGate. (2024, October 22). Earwax as an alternative specimen for forensic analysis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net

ResearchGate. (2024). Forensic examination of saliva stains. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net

Salerno, J. A., et al. (2019). Applications of enzyme-linked immunoassays in forensic biology. Analytical Biochemistry, 580, 23–31.

Sirchie. (2023). DNA & biological evidence collection. Retrieved from https://www.sirchie.com

Smith, R. N. (2019). Application of immunochromatographic assays in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 64(2), 134–145.

Stimson, P. G. (2019). Forensic analysis of biological evidence. CRC Press.

Tandfonline. (2023). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of biological fluids. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com

Tsai, L. C., et al. (2022). Stability of DNA in different environmental conditions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 68(4), 421–432.

Wang, Y., et al. (2018). The effect of environmental conditions on enzyme stability. Biochemical Journal, 475(6), 901–915.

Williams, G. (2020). Advances in forensic serology: Enzyme-based detection. Elsevier, 25(2), 152–170.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06

How to Cite

1.
Gupta G, Saini S. Expanding the Forensic Use of the Acid Phosphatase Test: Rapid Detection of Saliva, Earwax, and Sweat under varied Environmental Conditions. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.6 [cited 2025Jun.20];14(31S):370-375. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7131