The Art of Excellence: Revolutionizing Indian Medical Assessment in the Global CBME Landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i30S.7048Keywords:
Standard setting, Medical education, Assessment methods, CBME-(Competency-based medical education), NMC ( National Medical Commission), Angoff method, OSCE(Objective Structured Clinical Examination), NEXT, Criterion-referenced assessmentAbstract
Background and Objectives: Standard setting in medical education is a vital process that defines the minimum competency levels necessary for medical professionalism. Various standard-setting methods are employed globally to ensure assessments accurately evaluate knowledge, skills, and clinical competence.This study aims to examine different methods for standard setting in medical education, analyze their theoretical foundations, practical applications, and evaluate their relevance to the Indian medical education context.
Materials and Methods: The study reviewed standard-setting methods categorized as absolute, relative, and hybrid approaches. Absolute methods (Angoff, Ebel, and Hofstee), relative methods (Norm-Referenced and Borderline Group Methods), and emerging trends including artificial intelligence-driven standard setting were analyzed. Global practices such as USMLE(United States Medical Licensing Examination), PLAB(Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board), andNEXT( National Exit Test )were compared with current Indian approaches.
Results: The analysis revealed that absolute methods establish fixed performance criteria based on expert judgment, while relative methods determine passing scores based on peer performance comparisons. Emerging technology-enhanced methodologies showed promise in enhancing objectivity and consistency. Significant challenges identified in the Indian context include faculty development needs, resource disparities, limited technical expertise, and the scale of implementation across diverse medical institutions.
Conclusion: The study emphasizes the need for dynamic, evidence-based standard-setting approaches that balance academic rigor with practical competency assessment. For Indian medical education, the path forward includes faculty development in assessment methodologies, technology-enhanced assessment systems, gradual transition from norm-referenced to criterion-referenced approaches, and development of India-specific models that maintain global standards while addressing local healthcare needs.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Medical Council of India. Competency Based Undergraduate Curriculum for the Indian Medical Graduate. 2018.
National Medical Commission Act. Government of India. 2019.
National Testing Agency. National Eligibility cum Entrance Test. 2022.
National Medical Commission. Implementation of National Exit Test. 2021.
National Medical Commission. Graduate Medical Education Regulations. 2021.
Shah N, Desai C, Jorwekar G, Badyal D, Singh T. Competency-based medical education: An overview and application in pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol 2016; 48: 5-9.
Singh T, Modi JN, Patel C, Gupta P, Sood R. Workplace-based assessment: A step to promote competency based postgraduate training. Indian Pediatr 2017; 54(5): 353-9.
Sethi A, Schofield S, McAleer S, Ray A. Setting standards in medical education: An overview with recommendations. Indian J Med Ethics 2018; 3(4): 320-7.
Bansal P, Gupta A, Singh R, Gupta V, Kaur A. Competency-based medical education: Where are we? - A national survey of implementation in India. Indian J Pediatr 2020; 87(9): 790-6.
Supe A, Burdick WP. Challenges for medical education in India. Acad Med 2019; 94(9): 1306-12.
Zodpey S, Sharma A, Zahiruddin QS, Gaidhane A, Shrikhande S. Reforming medical education in India: Challenges and solutions. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9(5): 2183-7.
Shah N, Patel V, Raheja S, Sharma A, Tekian A. Attitude, Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) competencies for Indian Medical Graduate: Development and implementation. Indian Pediatr 2020; 57(12): 1061-9.
Patil SY, Gosavi M, Bannur HB, Ratnakar A. Faculty development program for competency based medical education: Issues and challenges. J Fam Med Prim Care 2020; 9(11): 5489-94.
Tekian A, Park YS, Tilton S, Fayez NK, Al-Eraky M. Artificial intelligence in medical education: Where are we now and where are we going? Med Teach 2019; 41(11): 1285-90.
National Medical Commission. Quality Assurance in Medical Education: Guidelines for Medical Colleges. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

