Study of Higher Education Teachers Attitudes towards the Implementation of National Education Policy 2020 in relation to Gender and type of Institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i3.6985Keywords:
National Education Policy 2020, Teacher Attitudes, Higher Education, Gender Differences, Multidisciplinary Education, Educational ReformsAbstract
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 introduces a comprehensive reform in India’s educational landscape, emphasizing multidisciplinary learning, vocational education, skill enhancement, and equity in higher education. For a policy to be carried out well, teachers’ positive attitudes are essential. This study aims to explore and compare the attitudes of college and university teachers towards the implementation of NEP 2020, with particular attention to the variables of gender and institutional type (government & private). Using a descriptive survey design, questions were asked of a carefully selected group of 250 teachers. Both a printed and digital version of a questionnaire was set up to obtain opinions from professional’s four important aspects of education.
Results show that gender plays a small role in influencing how teachers feel, so attitudes toward teaching are similar for men and women. Yet, based on where they teach, there were many differences, college teachers were more likely to be supportive, while university teachers and government teachers accepted somewhat more than teachers from private institutions. The main causes are frequently institutional autonomy, the distribution of resources and supporting administrators. According to this study, measures are especially important at private and university institutions such as building capacity, providing professional development and giving out resources evenly. What the research gives are important insights that can inform policy and guide educators in addressing inequities and helping everyone accept NEP 2020. The study explains how gender and the context of policies combine to build individuals’ attitudes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Agarwal, R., & Mishra, S. (2023). Gender dynamics in faculty perceptions of NEP 2020’s multidisciplinary framework in Indian universities. Gender and Education, 35(5), 321–336.
Bansal, S., & Tomar, R. (2022). Influence of gender and institutional type on teachers’ attitudes toward NEP 2020’s holistic education approach in Haryana. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 15(3), 45–56.
Bhatia, P., & Kumar, M. (2022). National Education Policy 2020: Implementation challenges in higher education. New Delhi, India: Academic Press.
Chaudhary, P., & Sharma, T. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of NEP 2020’s multidisciplinary education policy in Haryana’s colleges. Indian Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 89–102.
Chopra, A., & Singh, R. (2024). Institutional barriers to NEP 2020 adoption in private higher education institutions: A case study in Haryana. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Reforms (pp. 145–159). New Delhi, India: Springer.
Gupta, P., & Kumar, R. (2022). Perceptions of NEP 2020’s assessment reforms among university teachers in Haryana. Educational Assessment Review, 8(4), 123–135.
Jain, R., & Malik, S. (2023). Challenges in adopting NEP 2020’s credit-based system: A case study of university teachers in Haryana. Qualitative Education Research, 12(1), 67–80.
Joshi, K., & Patel, N. (2023). Teacher training and NEP 2020: Bridging the gap in public and private institutions. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(2), 78–92.
Kumar, A., & Singh, V. (2023). Perceptions of university teachers in Haryana regarding NEP 2020’s vocational education integration. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(1), 34–47.
Kumar, S., & Rao, V. (2021). NEP 2020 and higher education reforms: Perspectives from Indian college teachers. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(4), 567–580.
Mehta, S., & Kaur, R. (2023). Impact of institutional type on teachers’ attitudes toward NEP 2020’s research-oriented reforms in Haryana. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 101–115.
Mishra, A., & Gupta, N. (2023). Role of institutional governance in shaping attitudes toward NEP 2020 in North Indian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 16(3), 112–128.
Pandey, V., & Sharma, K. (2024). Faculty readiness for NEP 2020’s technology integration in Indian higher education: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(4), 210–225.
Sharma, R., & Gupta, S. (2022). Teachers’ attitudes toward NEP 2020 implementation in North Indian higher education institutions. Journal of Educational Reform, 18(4), 78–92.
Sharma, V., & Singh, P. (2022). Perceptions of NEP 2020’s equity and inclusion policies among rural college teachers in Haryana. Journal of Inclusive Education, 10(1), 45–59.
Singh, D., & Yadav, R. (2024). Faculty attitudes toward NEP 2020’s research and innovation policies in Indian higher education. Research in Higher Education, 65(2), 189–204.
Singh, M., & Rani, S. (2021). Attitudes toward NEP 2020’s regional language integration in Haryana’s higher education. Language and Education Journal, 9(3), 56–68.
Verma, N., & Yadav, P. (2021). College teachers’ readiness for NEP 2020’s skill-based education framework in Haryana. Indian Journal of Educational Studies, 7(1), 23–35.
Verma, S., & Kaur, M. (2023). NEP 2020 and the future of Indian higher education: Teacher perspectives. Mumbai, India: Himalaya Publishing House.
Yadav, A., & Sharma, N. (2023). Role of teacher training in shaping attitudes toward NEP 2020 implementation in Haryana’s colleges. Journal of Professional Development in Education, 14(2), 88–100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.