Prevalence and Prediction of Post-Caesarean Delivery Intra-Abdominal Adhesions in a Rural Tertiary Care Centre

Authors

  • Lakshmi Priya Rajavel
  • Vimarshitha
  • Anil sakalecha

Keywords:

Cesarean section, Adhesions, Postoperative complications, Surgical outcomes, Maternal health

Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal adhesions are of particular concern but have never been fully screened among women undergoing cesarean sections (CS) globally, with evidence of CS being associated with lower complications in the short- and long-term. These adhesions can result in a variety of maternal and fetal issues such as bowel obstruction, chronic pain, and surgical challenges in the future. The present study attempts to determine the prevalence of intra-abdominal adhesions and association between adhesions and postoperative complications in a rural tertiary care hospital.

Methods: Data was collected from a prospective observational study performed by the authors at R. L Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre, Kolar, from May 2024 to July 2024. Forty-six women scheduled for repeat cesarean delivery, and incidence of at least one prior CS, were included. The preoperative assessment included symptom assessment (e.g., constipation, pelvic pain) and abdominal scar evaluation and ultrasonographic slide tests. A scoring system was used to classify intra-operative adhesions. Descriptive statistics and Chi Square Test were used to correlate preoperative assessments, intraoperative findings with postoperative complications.

Results: In 30 out of the 46 women (65%) intra-abdominal adhesions were found. Adhesions were more common with increasing number of previous CS, with adhesions seen in 45% of the women with one previous CS and 85% of the women with two or more previous CS. The presence of adhesions was significantly correlated with preoperative symptoms including pelvic pain and urinary retention (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: Intra-abdominal adhesion is substantially more common in women undergoing repeated cesarean deliveries. Such adhesions also lead to longer surgical time and blood loss, which further justifies a preoperative prediction to plan surgery carefully in order to prevent complications. As rates of cesarean sections increase globally, the need for not only awareness but also consideration of adhesions in counseling of patients undergoing cesarean delivery is warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Angolile, Cornel M et al. “Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action.” Health science reports vol. 6,5 e1274. 18 May. 2023, doi:10.1002/hsr2.1274

Ghobrial, Stefan et al. “An Overview of Postoperative Intraabdominal Adhesions and Their Role on Female Infertility: A Narrative Review.” Journal of clinical medicine vol. 12,6 2263. 15 Mar. 2023, doi:10.3390/jcm12062263

Fatehi Hassanabad, Ali et al. “Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms.” Biomedicines vol. 9,8 867. 22 Jul. 2021, doi:10.3390/biomedicines9080867

Sung S, Mikes BA, Martingano DJ, et al. Cesarean Delivery. [Updated 2024 Dec 7]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546707/

Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and Risks of Cesarean Section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(33-34):529-36. Available from: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article?id=176063Obstetrics & Gynecology

Moris, Demetrios et al. “Postoperative Abdominal Adhesions: Clinical Significance and Advances in Prevention and Management.” Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract vol. 21,10 (2017): 1713-1722. doi:10.1007/s11605-017-3488-9

Menzies D, Ellis H. The pathogenesis of postoperative adhesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72(1):60-3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492660/

Nuamah, Mercy A et al. “Prevalence of adhesions and associated postoperative complications after cesarean section in Ghana: a prospective cohort study.” Reproductive health vol. 14,1 143. 2 Nov. 2017, doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0388-0

Ozturk, Ugur K et al. “Evaluation of the Preoperative Slide Test in the Prediction of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions: A Single-Center, Double-Blinded, Prospective Observational Study.” Surgical innovation vol. 30,5 (2023): 557-563. doi:10.1177/15533506231186071

Stocker, Linden J et al. “Are skin scar characteristics associated with the degree of pelvic adhesions at laparoscopy?.” Fertility and sterility vol. 101,2 (2014): 501-5. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.026

Mokhtari, Mojgan et al. “Prediction of Intraperitoneal Adhesions in Repeated Cesarean Section Using Sliding Sign, Striae Gravidarum, and Cesarean Scar.” Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran vol. 36 44. 2 May. 2022, doi:10.47176/mjiri.36.44

Downloads

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

1.
Rajavel LP, Vimarshitha V, sakalecha A. Prevalence and Prediction of Post-Caesarean Delivery Intra-Abdominal Adhesions in a Rural Tertiary Care Centre. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May16 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(24S):637-42. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6027