Comparative Study Between Dynamic Navigation System And Guided Endodontics In Access Cavity Preparation

Authors

  • Ihab El Sayed Hassanein
  • Shady Ali Hussien
  • Mahmoud Lotfy El Gharib

Keywords:

guided access, navident, static guide, dentin lost

Abstract

Aim :. The aim of the present study was to compare between two computer guided access cavity designs: Dynamic Navigation Access and Guided Access with Traditional Access Cavity in respect to the Procedure time, Percentage of hard tissue removal.

Methods: forty-five 3D printed maxillary first permanent molar were divided into three groups: Group I (Dynamic navigation guided access), Group II (static guided access) Group III (conventional access). CBCT scans taken for all mounted treatment teeth. Pulp chamber volume is calculated using 3D Slicer. Access cavity was done in each group according to the system used. The time taken during access was recorded in seconds. Afterwards, CBCT scans taken and Pulp chamber volume is calculated using 3D Slicer to assess the amount of dentin lost.

Results: There was a significant difference between different groups in access time ,the highest mean time was found in group (III) , followed by group (I) while the lowest time was found in group (II). Regarding percentage of dentin lost there was a significant difference between different groups highest mean lost dentine was found in group (III) followed by group (I)  while the lowest value was found in group (II).

Conclusion: Static guided access is a time saver with conservative approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhang Y, Liu Y, She Y, Liang Y, Xu F, Fang C. The Effect of Endodontic Access Cavities on Fracture Resistance of First Maxillary Molar Using the Extended Finite Element Method. J Endod. 2019;45(3).

Jain SD, Saunders MW, Carrico CK, Jadhav A, Deeb JG, Myers GL. Dynamically Navigated versus Freehand Access Cavity Preparation: A Comparative Study on Substance Loss Using Simulated Calcified Canals. J Endod. 2020;46(11):1745-1751.

Chong BS, Dhesi M, Makdissi J. Computer-aided dynamic navigation: a novel method for guided endodontics. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3).

Dhesi M, San Chong B. Dynamic navigation for guided endodontics: a case report. Endo-Endodontic Practice Today. 2020;14(4).

Widmann G. Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007;3(1).

Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK. Robotic technology in surgery: Past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4 SUPPL. 1).

Abou-Elnaga MY, Alkhawas MBAM, Kim HC, Refai AS. Effect of Truss Access and Artificial Truss Restoration on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molars. J Endod. 2019;45(6).

Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Muñoz A de P, Deglow ER, Agustín-Panadero R, Álvarez JM. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static procedure for endodontic access cavities: An in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(1).

9. Jain SD, Saunders MW, Carrico CK, Jadhav A, Deeb JG, Myers GL. Dynamically Navigated versus Freehand Access Cavity Preparation: A Comparative Study on Substance Loss Using Simulated Calcified Canals. J Endod. 2020;46(11):1745-1751.

D GT, Saxena P, Gupta S. Static vs. dynamic navigation for endodontic microsurgery - A comparative review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022;12(4).

Ribeiro D, Reis E, Marques JA, Falacho RI, Palma PJ. Guided Endodontics: Static vs. Dynamic Computer-Aided Techniques—A Literature Review. J Pers Med. 2022;12(9).

Connert T, Krug R, Eggmann F, et al. Guided Endodontics versus Conventional Access Cavity Preparation: A Comparative Study on Substance Loss Using 3-dimensional–printed Teeth. J Endod. 2019;45(3).

Dianat O, Nosrat A, Tordik PA, et al. Accuracy and Efficiency of a Dynamic Navigation System for Locating Calcified Canals. J Endod. 2020;46(11):1719-1725.

Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G, Kühl S. Guided endodontics: accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int Endod J. 2016;49(10).

Torres A, Boelen GJ, Lambrechts P, Pedano MS, Jacobs R. Dynamic navigation: a laboratory study on the accuracy and potential use of guided root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2021;54(9).

Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, Emery R. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31(4).

Janabi A, Tordik PA, Griffin IL, et al. Accuracy and Efficiency of 3-dimensional Dynamic Navigation System for Removal of Fiber Post from Root Canal–Treated Teeth. J Endod. 2021;47(9):1453-1460.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

1.
Hassanein IES, Hussien SA, Lotfy El Gharib M. Comparative Study Between Dynamic Navigation System And Guided Endodontics In Access Cavity Preparation. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May15 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(23S):999-1007. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5856

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 23S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.