Prediction of Difficult Mask Ventilation Using Ultrasound Evaluation of the Palatoglossal Space: An Observational Study
Keywords:
Point-of-care ultrasonography, Airway assessment, Tongue thickness, Difficult mask ventilation, Ultrasound, Palatoglossal spaceAbstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction:Difficult mask ventilation (DMV) continues to be a major concern in airway management. Traditional methods, such as Modified Mallampati Grading (MMG), have limitations, particularly in anaesthetized patients. Ultrasonographic assessment of the palatoglossal space (PGS) and tongue thickness (TT) has emerged as a promising technique for airway evaluation. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of PGS and TT in predicting DMV.
Materials & Methods:This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, from January 2024 to July 2024. A total of 100 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. PGS and TT were measured using submandibular ultrasonography with a curvilinear probe. DMV was defined as inadequate face mask ventilation despite standard airway maneuvers. Statistical analysis included ROC curve generation and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
Results:Among 100 patients, 56% were male and 44% female, with a mean age of 42 years and BMI of 24 kg/m². The incidence of DMV was 28.1%. Patients with DMV had significantly lower PGS values (0.68 ± 2.01 mm) compared to those with easy mask ventilation (7.01 ± 1.59 mm, P = 0.000). TT was significantly higher in DMV patients (43.01 ± 2.99 mm) versus the easy mask ventilation group (41.3 ± 2.68 mm, P = 0.002). ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.999 for PGS and 0.876 for TT in predicting DMV. A PGS cut-off of ≤6.5 mm showed 94.4% sensitivity and 93% specificity.
Conclusion:Ultrasonographic assessment of the palatoglossal space is a highly effective tool for predicting DMV. PGS outperforms TT in terms of diagnostic accuracy, and its simplicity supports its integration into routine preoperative airway assessment.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: A cohort study of 188,064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(3):272-81.
Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32(4):429-34.
Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(5):456-62.
Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(5):456-62.
Yildiz TS, Solak M, Toker K. The incidence and risk factors of difficult mask ventilation. J Anesth. 2005;19(1):7-11.
Myatra SN, Dhawan I, D’Souza SA, Elakkumanan LB, Jain D, Natarajan P. Recent advances in airway management. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67(1):48-55.
Cormack RS. Cormack-Lehane classification revisited. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(6):867-8.
Akoglu H. User’s guide to sample size estimation in diagnostic accuracy studies. Turk J Emerg Med. 2022;22(3):177-85.
Wojtczak JA. Submandibular sonography: A new window for airway imaging. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(1):197-9.
Ezri T, Gewurtz G, Sessler DI, Medalion B, Szmuk P, Hagberg C, et al. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients by ultrasound quantification of anterior neck soft tissue. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(11):1111-4.
Adhikari S, Zeger W, Schmier C, Crum T, Shrestha R. Pilot study to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the assessment of difficult laryngoscopy. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(7):754-8.
Reddy PB, Punetha P, Chalam KS. Ultrasonography - A new frontier in airway assessment: A review. J Clin Anesth. 2016;33:42-8.
Fulkerson JS, Moore HM, Anderson TS, Lowe RF. Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(3):513-30
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.