Restrictions In Conventional Asepsis as a Result of Protective Gear During Covid – Effects on Postoperative Infections

Authors

  • Gagandeep Kaur
  • Suprajna Shetty
  • Priya Ballal
  • Saumya Srivastava

Keywords:

Personal protective equipment (PPE), surgical site infection, COVID, caesarean section, vaginal delivery

Abstract

Background:  The novel coronavirus disease which is caused by SARS CoV 2 became a pandemic and several measures were implemented to contain/prevent its transmission like use of N95 mask, face shield, use of Personal Protective equipment (PPE). The PPE is meant to reduce the transmission of infection from the patient to healthcare workers and to other patients. The surgeons sanitize their hands with alcohol-based solution and wear sterile scrubs over the PPE and perform the surgery. The concept of scrubbing is not applicable when operating in a PPE. The problem arises during surgical management of such cases as PPE causes discomfort and visualization difficulties. This study is therefore aimed at determining if the incidence of surgical site infection has increased despite having stringent hygiene methods and restricted movement of staff and relatives.

Aims and Objectives: To study and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) risk in patients undergoing obstetric and gynaecological surgical procedures during the pre-COVID and COVID era.

Materials and methods: The study was a retrospective observational study conducted at Lady Goschen Hospital, Mangalore which is a tertiary care centre of Dakshinna Kannada and serves as a referral centre for other hospitals, under the Department of OBG, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore.

The study participants were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprising of patients operated at Lady Goschen Hospital in the COVID free period from March 2019 to February 2020 and developed SSIs and the Group 2 comprising of patients operated during COVID era from March 2020 to February 2021 and developed SSIs.

Inclusion criteria: All the patients undergoing obstetric and gynaecological surgical procedures who developed SSIs.

Method: The study was conducted by going through the medical records of the patients operated during the study period and will be assessed for the associated risk factors, type of SSI, and the management done for the SSI. The proportion in the two groups will then be assessed and compared.

Results: In the two study groups, no significant difference was found in the demographic data. The mean BMI between both the groups were also not significant. Some of the risk factors identified were presence of medical disorders like diabetes, hypertension complicating pregnancy. The duration of surgery showed no statistical significance. There was an increase in SSI in the COVID -19 period when compared to pre-pandemic period hence leading to an increased need of secondary suturing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wang D., Hu B., Hu C.et al.Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;

Huang C., Wang Y., Li X.et al.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395: 497-506

Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y.et al.Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;

Chen N., Zhou M., Dong X.et al.Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020; 395

Yu P., Zhu J.,Zhang Z., Han Y. A familial cluster of infection associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating possible person-to-person transmission during the incubation period. J Infect Dis. 2020.

Wu Z., McGoogan J.M.Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020.

Bai Y.,Yao L., Wei T.et al.Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;

Surgical management of patients with COVID 19 infection. Recommendations of the Spanish association of surgeons. Jose M Balibrea et al. Spanish surgery. Volume 98 issue 5 May 2020 page 251 – 259.

Itani KM. Care bundles and prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery. JAMA. 2015;314(3):289–290.

Ruiz-Tovar J, Llavero C, Morales V, Gamallo C. Effect of the application of a bundle of three measures (intraperitoneal lavage with antibiotic solution, fascial closure with Triclosan-coated sutures and Mupirocin ointment application on the skin staples) on the surgical site infection after elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(8):3495–3501.

Hedenstierna G, Meyhoff CS, Perchiazzi G, Larsson A, Wetterslev J, Rasmussen LS. Modification of the World Health Organization global guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection is needed. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(4):765–768.

https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/publications/ssi-prevention-guidelines/en/

Liu Z, Dumville JC, Norman G, et al. Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2:CD012653.

Sartelli M, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L, et al. Knowledge, awareness, and attitude towards infection prevention and management among surgeons: identifying the surgeon champion. World J Emerg Surg. 2018; 13:37.

Thangaraju P, Venkatesan S. Responding to the Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2018: a focus on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis prolongation. J Res Med Sci. 2019; 24:90.

Sartelli M, Pagani L, Iannazzo S, et al. A proposal for a comprehensive approach to infections across the surgical pathway. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):13.

Pasquale Losurdo et al. Impact of lockdown for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) on surgical site infection rates: A Monocentric observational cohort study. Updates Surg. 2020 September 14:1-9.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-26

How to Cite

1.
Kaur G, Shetty S, Ballal P, Srivastava S. Restrictions In Conventional Asepsis as a Result of Protective Gear During Covid – Effects on Postoperative Infections. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.26 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(17S):939-43. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/4699

Most read articles by the same author(s)