Dynamics of Meta Governance in the Proactive Recruitment Process f Prospective Members Ofo the Republic Of Indonesia Police

Authors

  • Fadly Samad
  • Muh. Thahir Haning
  • Muh. Akmal Ibrahim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3459

Keywords:

Proactive Recruitment, Initial Conditions, and Metagovernance

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the dynamics of meta-governance in the proactive recruitment process for prospective members of the Indonesian National Police in terms of initial conditions and meta-governance elements in collaborative innovation. The research design used was qualitative with a case study strategy. This research was carried out at 3 Regional Police Forces (POLDA), namely South Sulawesi Police, North Kalimantan Police, and Papua Police. Determination of research informants using purposive sampling, where informants are selected based on involvement and knowledge. Data collection includes observation, in-depth interviews, and document review. Data analysis techniques use interactive data analysis. Validity and reliability using triangulation, namely combine various data sources, methods, or theories to verify and strengthen research findings.

Research results regarding initial conditions in the proactive recruitment program for prospective members Polri show that the Polri institution has long built cooperation with stakeholders on other recruitment channels before engaging in a proactive recruitment program, so it is not difficult to initiate cooperation in proactive recruitment. Element Metagovernance in the proactive recruitment program for prospective members of the National Police shows that The rules of the game and implementation of SOPs refer to the regulations of the National Police Chief and Jukrah. Furthermore, the rules of the game and SOP are discussed in uniformity of perception, briefing, discussion, and coordination between the Regional Police and all the stakeholders

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) ‘Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), pp. 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.

David Osborne, T. G. (1993) ‘Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector’, JSTOR, Vol. 25, N, pp. 683–691.

Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2005). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six collaborative governance programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 381-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui026

Grabher, G. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491-1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604048159

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). What makes partnerships work? In C. Huxham (Ed.), The Challenge of Collaborative Governance (pp. 237-258). Routledge.

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.

Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. P. (2004). Building collaborative public management: Lessons from the public sector. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00372.x

Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H. (1983) ‘Strategy‐making and environment: The third link’, Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), pp. 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304.

Nutt, P. C. and Backoff, R. W. (1993) ‘Transforming Public Organizations with Strategic Management and Strategic Leadership’, Journal of Management, 19(2), pp. 299–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900206.

Pacheco-Vega, J., & Rojas, F. (2015). Institutional collaboration in water governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.905117

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243-1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076583

Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2012). Introduction: Collaborative innovation in the public sector. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1.

Turrini, A., Christopoulos, D., & Denti, L. (2010). The challenges of public-private partnerships in public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02131.x

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

1.
Samad F, Thahir Haning M, Ibrahim MA. Dynamics of Meta Governance in the Proactive Recruitment Process f Prospective Members Ofo the Republic Of Indonesia Police. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.11 [cited 2025Oct.15];14(9S):801-4. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/3459