Ink on Paper: A Study of Line Quality and Fluid Dynamics in Handwritten Documents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2950Keywords:
Line Quality, Image Analysis, Fluid Dynamics, Age identification, JusticeAbstract
Handwriting and document analysis is a major area of forensic science. The present research attempts to study the line quality of handwritten documents, which is useful for comparing and analyzing questioned documents. This study examines the differences in line quality produced by 0.5mm ballpoint pens, commonly used in daily life. The objective is to determine whether any differences exist between different pens of the same tip caliber. For this study, a stereomicroscope was used to capture images of handwritten documents collected by the researcher. Specialized software was then used to measure line quality. The results indicate that even when using pens of the same caliber, the line quality varied depending on the pen. This variation was observed not only in standard writing but also in scribbling motions such as vertical and horizontal strokes, where differences in line quality were also evident. Furthermore, the study applied Fick’s time-dependent diffusion law of fluid dynamics to determine the age of ink. Combining line quality data with Fick’s law of diffusion provided valuable insights. It was found that handwriting produced with pens of the same caliber exhibited disparities, and if such writing was added at a later time, diffusion analysis could help detect alterations or additions to the original writing. These findings highlight the practical application of fluid dynamics laws in handwriting analysis and the detection of alterations in questioned documents.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Morris RN. Forensic Handwriting Identification: Fundamental Concepts and Principles. London: Academic Press; 2021.
HARRALSON HH. M LARRY S. HUBER AND HEADRICK’S HANDWRITING IDENTIFICATION: facts and fundamentals, second edition. S.l.: CRC PRESS; 2021.
Ellen D, Day S, Davies C. Scientific Examination of Documents: Methods and Techniques [Internet]. 4th ed. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, [2019] | David Ellen is the main author on all earlier editions of this work.: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 2025 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429959332
Stewart LF. The Process of Forensic Handwriting Examinations. FRCIJ [Internet]. 2017 Apr 28 [cited 2025 Mar 4];4(5). Available from: https://medcraveonline.com/FRCIJ/the-process-of-forensic-handwriting-examinations.html
Davis T. The Practice of Handwriting Identification. The Library. 2007 Sep 1;8(3):251–76.
Khajuria A, Pillai AA. Forensic handwriting examination: An updated clinical review. Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences. 2023 Jul;9(2):223–8.
Saks MJ, VanderHaar H. On the “general acceptance” of handwriting identification principles. J Forensic Sci. 2005 Jan;50(1):119–26.
The Working Group on Human Factors in Handwriting Examination. Forensic handwriting examination and human factors: improving the practice through a systems approach [Internet]. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2020 Feb [cited 2025 Mar 4] p. NIST IR 8282. Report No.: NIST IR 8282. Available from: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2020/NIST.IR.8282.pdf
Saraswal A, Rahul Saxena U. Analysis and Recognition of Handwriting Patterns for Personality Trait Prediction Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach. In: Singari RM, Kankar PK, editors. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering [Internet]. IOS Press; 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 4]. Available from: https://ebooks.iospress.nl/doi/10.3233/ATDE220778
Gagiu D, Sendrescu D. Detection of Handwriting Characteristics using Convolutional Neural Networks. In: 2023 24th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC) [Internet]. Miskolc-Szilvásvárad, Hungary: IEEE; 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 4]. p. 157–60. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10178936/
Hilton O. Line Quality—Historic and Contemporary Views. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1987 Jan 1;32(1):118–20.
Vaccarone P, Mohammed L. Line Quality in Non-original Documents Expert Opinions and Conclusions. asqde-j-jasqde. 2022 Jun 1;25(1):9–20.
Sharma P, Singh M, Jasuja OP. Forensic examination of electronic signatures: A comparative study. nkp. 2021 Nov 9;59:149–84.
Fuglsby C, Saunders C, Ommen DM, Buscaglia J, Caligiuri MP. Elucidating the relationships between two automated handwriting feature quantification systems for multiple pairwise comparisons. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2022 Mar;67(2):642–50.
Geistová Čakovská B, Kalantzis N, Dziedzic T, Fernandes C, Zimmer J, Branco MJ, et al. Recommendations for capturing signatures digitally to optimize their suitability for forensic handwriting examination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021 Mar;66(2):743–7.
Tüselmann O, Fink GA. Neural models for semantic analysis of handwritten document images. IJDAR. 2024 Sep;27(3):245–63.
Mirón-Mérida VA, Wu M, Gong YY, Guo Y, Holmes M, Ettelaie R, et al. Mathematical characterization of ink diffusion and imbibition processes in chromatography paper as a potential biosensing platform. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research. 2021 Jun;32:100421.
Yarin AL. Applications of fluid dynamics and mechanics of continua in forensics. Physics of Fluids. 2023 Dec 1;35(12):120401.
Lohse D. Fundamental Fluid Dynamics Challenges in Inkjet Printing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2022 Jan 5;54(1):349–82.
Morrison NF, Harlen OG. Viscoelasticity in inkjet printing. Rheol Acta. 2010 Jun;49(6):619–32.
Lee J, Murad S, Nikolov A. Ballpoint/Rollerball Pens: Writing Performance and Evaluation. Colloids and Interfaces. 2023 Apr 4;7(2):29.
Lohse D. Fundamental Fluid Dynamics Challenges in Inkjet Printing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2022 Jan 5;54(1):349–82.
Antonopoulou E, Harlen OG, Walkley MA, Kapur N. Jetting behavior in drop-on-demand printing: Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations. Phys Rev Fluids. 2020 Apr 29;5(4):043603.
Attinger D, Moore C, Donaldson A, Jafari A, Stone HA. Fluid dynamics topics in bloodstain pattern analysis: Comparative review and research opportunities. Forensic Science International. 2013 Sep;231(1–3):375–96.
Kim S, Choi JH, Sohn DK, Ko HS. The Effect of Ink Supply Pressure on Piezoelectric Inkjet. Micromachines. 2022 Apr 14;13(4):615.
Estelle KT, Gozen BA. Complex ink flow mechanisms in micro-direct-ink-writing and their implications on flow rate control. Additive Manufacturing. 2022 Nov;59:103183.
Xu S, Mei X, Dong W, Zhang Z, Zhang X. Interactive visual simulation of dynamic ink diffusion effects. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry [Internet]. Hong Kong China: ACM; 2011 [cited 2025 Mar 4]. p. 109–16. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2087756.2087770
Simonnet D, Anquetil E, Bouillon M. Multi-criteria handwriting quality analysis with online fuzzy models. Pattern Recognition. 2017 Sep;69:310–24.
Grace M, Janaki MC, Renjini R. Forensic fluid dynamics: Insights into science of flow. Physics of Fluids. 2025 Mar 1;37(3):037112.
Hicklin RA, Eisenhart L, Richetelli N, Miller MD, Belcastro P, Burkes TM, et al. Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022 Aug 9;119(32):e2119944119.
Krishnan P, Jawahar CV. HWNet v2: an efficient word image representation for handwritten documents. IJDAR. 2019 Dec;22(4):387–405.
Faigenbaum-Golovin S, Shaus A, Sober B, Turkel E, Piasetzky E, Finkelstein I. Algorithmic handwriting analysis of the Samaria inscriptions illuminates bureaucratic apparatus in biblical Israel. Dilley P, editor. PLoS ONE. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227452.
Chu NSH, Tai CL. MoXi: real-time ink dispersion in absorbent paper. ACM Trans Graph. 2005 Jul;24(3):504–11.
Nikolov A, Murad S, Wasan D, Wu P. How the capillarity and ink-air flow govern the performance of a fountain pen. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2020 Oct;578:660–7.
Guo Z, Fei F, Song X, Zhou C. Analytical Study of Shear-Thinning Fluid Flow in Direct Ink Writing Process. In: Volume 1: Additive Manufacturing; Biomanufacturing; Life Cycle Engineering; Manufacturing Equipment and Automation; Nano/Micro/Meso Manufacturing [Internet]. West Lafayette, Indiana, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 4]. p. V001T01A034. Available from: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/MSEC/proceedings/MSEC2022/85802/V001T01A034/1146951
Morgan H. Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. TQR [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 4]; Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol27/iss1/4/
Ommen DM, Fuglsby C, Caligiuri MP. Advances toward validating examiner writership opinion based on handwriting kinematics. Forensic Science International. 2021 Jan;318:110644.
Pandey N, Singh B, Singh S. Review on handwriting examination on unusual surface. IJFMTS. 2024 Jan 28;8(4):125–31.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
