Screening of Phonological Processes in Pre-School Bilingual Children

Authors

  • Tayyba Majeed
  • ShaziaYounas
  • Farheen Naz Anis
  • Samia Kanwal
  • Esha Jabbar
  • Amman Shoket
  • Iqra Imtiaz
  • Yousra Haroon
  • Rameen Rafaqat
  • Aliza Abbas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i2S.9897

Keywords:

preschoolers, bilinguals, phonological awareness, screening, Q-PAS

Abstract

Phonological screening was done in preschool bilinguals as it was observed that there is a tendency of least and less efficient performance in spoken English as compare to written. So this screening was done among the preschoolers as it was their school’s rule to communicate in English during school hours. This study was conducted to screen out phonological processes among preschool bilingual children .A cross sectional study was done. Sample of 300 participants were taken. Phonological awareness screening tool Q-PAS was used. In which phonological awareness process i.e. rhyme production, rhyme awareness, word awareness, syllable awareness, sound awareness at initial medial and final position and deletion tasks etc. later on, when whole data was gathered. Cross tab analysis was done through SPSS. All of the variable were explained according to age of participant and class i.e. grades in which students were studying. Their responses were categorized in poor, fair and excellent criteria. The calculated results showed that in the manner of spoken students are unaware of many phonological processes. At the ends, as result it was figured out that bilingual preschoolers tried well but their results showed that they have errors in phonological processes i.e. rhyme production, sound blending, sound segmentation, sounds identification at different positions of word.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.J.L. Metsala, A.C. Walley “Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability”

J.L. Metsala, L.C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy, Erlbaum (1998), pp. 89-120

2. Anderson, S. R. (2001). Phonology. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 11386–11392. doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/02982-x

3. P. Anderson “Assessment of development of executive function (EF) during childhood”Child Neuropsychology, 8 (2) (2002), pp. 71-82, 10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724

4. J.L. Anthony, D.J. Francis “Development of phonological awareness”Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14 (5) (2005), pp. 255-259 (doi:10.1111%2Fj.0963-7214.2005.00376.x)

5.J. Vloedgraven, L. Verhoeven “Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: An IRT approach”Annals of Dyslexia, 57 (1) (2007), pp. 33-50, 10.1007/s11881-007-0001-2

6. Jokhio, A. H. (2012a). Functional Essential and Functional Brief Study. Sindhi Boli Tahqeeqi Journal, 3, 41–77.

7. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/written-language disorders/phonological-processing/

8.Goriot C, Unsworth S, van Hout R, Broersma M, McQueen JM. Differences in phonological awareness performance: Are there positive or negative effects of bilingual experience?. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 2021 Jun 4;11(3):418-51.

9. Medeiros AC, Santos MF, Varela FV, Rocha TA, Messias BL, Azoni CA. Bilingualism in the development of phonological awareness skills: an integrative literature review. Revista CEFAC. 2020 Sep 28;22.

10. Kechich, D., Ghozlane, N., & Melgani, H. (2022). A Study of parent’s linguistic choices and beliefs about multiple languages teaching in primary school. Kechich, D., Ghozlane, N., & Melgani, H. (2022). A Study of parent’s linguistic choices and beliefs about multiple languages teaching in primary school.

11. Zhang, X., Lau, C., & Su, Y. (2023). Home environment and development of English as a second/foreign language for young children in Asian contexts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 34(1), 274-305.

12. Oanh N, Tri N. Applying Shadowing Technique and Authentic Materials to Promote Phonological Awareness among Young Learners of English. Proceeding of ELT upgrades. 2019.

13. Vaisman EE, Kahn‐Horwitz J. English foreign language teachers' linguistic knowledge, beliefs, and reported practices regarding reading and spelling instruction. Dyslexia. 2020 Aug;26(3):305-22.

14. Roehr-Brackin K, Tellier A. The role of language-analytic ability in children’s instructed second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2019 Dec;41(5):1111-31.

15. Thompson M. The Effect of English Language Proficiency on Phonological Awareness Skills Among Second Graders. Journal of Graduate Education Research. 2022;3(1):6.

16. Ahmad I, Khan I, Saeed N. FACTORS INFLUENCING FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING IN THE EARLY CHILDHOOD: A QUALITATIVE INQUIRY. Gomal University Journal of Research. 2022 Apr 11;38(1):109-21.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-08

How to Cite

1.
Majeed T, ShaziaYounas S, Naz Anis F, Kanwal S, Jabbar E, Shoket A, et al. Screening of Phonological Processes in Pre-School Bilingual Children. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 8 [cited 2026 Mar. 3];14(2S):876-901. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/9897