post-Traumatic Growth Following EMDR Therapy Versus Collective Post-Traumatic Growth Among the People of Gaza.
Keywords:
Post-Traumatic Growth, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD), people of GazaAbstract
Post-Traumatic Growth (PTG) is a multidimensional construct that refers to the positive psychological changes that may emerge following exposure to traumatic experiences. This work examines PTG from both an individual therapeutic perspective—through Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)—and a collective socio-cultural perspective, as illustrated by the experience of the people of Gaza.
Within EMDR therapy, PTG is conceptualized as a structured, phase-based process grounded in the Adaptive Information Processing (AIP) model. Traumatic memories, initially stored in a fragmented and emotionally charged form, are reprocessed through bilateral stimulation, leading to decreased emotional reactivity, cognitive restructuring, and integration of the traumatic experience into a coherent autobiographical narrative. Neurobiologically, EMDR facilitates reduced amygdala hyperactivation, enhanced prefrontal cortical regulation, and restored hippocampal functioning, thereby supporting emotional regulation, meaning reconstruction, and the development of personal strength, resilience, and improved interpersonal relationships.
In contrast, PTG in the context of Gaza emerges as a collective phenomenon shaped by chronic and repeated exposure to war, siege, and political violence. Here, growth extends beyond individual cognition and emotional regulation to encompass shared identity, collective memory, cultural narratives, and social cohesion. National identity, religious beliefs, and communal solidarity function as meaning-making frameworks that transform suffering into collective dignity, resistance, and existential purpose. Empirical research in conflict settings demonstrates that sustained trauma does not preclude growth; rather, it may foster communal resilience, social bonding, and shared moral values that mitigate the psychological impact of adversity.
Physiologically and emotionally, collective PTG is supported by social regulation of affect, communal coping mechanisms, and adaptive emotional regulation strategies. Factors such as social support, collective emotion sharing, and cultural rituals contribute to improved autonomic regulation and psychological resilience, reflecting parallels with individual-level neurobiological mechanisms observed in EMDR, including reduced stress-system activation and enhanced emotional flexibility.
A comparative analysis highlights both divergence and convergence between EMDR-based individual PTG and collective PTG in Gaza. EMDR operates within a structured, safe, and therapeutic context, producing measurable individual growth through targeted neurocognitive reprocessing. Collective PTG, however, evolves within an ongoing traumatic environment and is sustained through cultural, social, and historical processes rather than clinical intervention. Despite these differences, both forms of PTG share core mechanisms: meaning reconstruction, emotional regulation, identity transformation, and the conversion of trauma from a source of threat into a resource for psychological and social growth.
In conclusion, PTG should be understood as a dynamic, multi-level process that integrates neurobiological, psychological, social, and cultural dimensions. Whether facilitated through individual psychotherapy or collective resilience in contexts of chronic conflict, PTG reflects the human capacity to transform profound suffering into personal strength, shared meaning, and enduring resilience..
Downloads
References
[1] Al-Baddai, N. A. (2025). Collective trauma and the resilience of resistance in Gaza: Psychological and social adaptation in confronting Israeli aggression (2023–2025). Journal of Psychology (Theoretical article).
[2] Bisson, J. I., Ehlers, A., Matthews, R., Pilling, S., Richards, D., & Turner, S. (2007). Psychological treatments for chronic post‐traumatic stress disorder : Systematic review and meta‐analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 97–104.
[3] Brooks, M., O’Brien, R. O., Livanou, M., Turner, M. J., & Whittenbury, K. (2024). Collective violence, strengths, and perceived posttraumatic growth : A scoping review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, advance online publication.
[4] Cloitre, M., Courtois, C. A., Charuvastra, A., Carapezza, R., Stolbach, B. C., & Green, B. L. (2012). Treatment of complex PTSD: Results of the ISTSS expert clinician survey. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25(6), 615–627.
[5] Courtois, C. A., & Ford, J. D. (2009). Treating complex traumatic stress disorders: An evidence-based guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press
[6] Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[7] Cloitre, M., Garvert, D. W., Brewin, C. R., Bryant, R. A., & Maercker, A. (2013). Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: A latent profile analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 20706.
[8] Galinksy, A., et al. (2023). Individual and community post-traumatic growth: data-driven examination... Journal of Traumatic Stress. PubMed
[9] Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: Free Press.
[10] Horesh, D., Lowe, S. R., Galea, S., Uddin, M., & Koenen, K. C. (2016). An in-depth look into PTSD–depression comorbidity: A longitudinal study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 203, 317–325.
[11] Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[12] Karatzias, T., et al. (2017). PTSD and complex PTSD: ICD-11 updates and implications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(2), 85–86.
[13] Khattak, M. H. K., Israr, J., & Khan, M. (2024). Post Traumatic Growth: Psychological and physiological processes. Journal of Development and Social Sciences. JDSS
[14] Shapiro, F. (1989). Eye movement desensitization: A new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20(3), 211–217.
[15] Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[16] Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[17] Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–47
[18] Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.
[19] van der Kolk, B. A. (2015). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. New York, NY: Viking.
[20] van der Kolk, B. A., Spinazzola, J., Blaustein, M. E., Hopper, J. W., Hopper, E. K., Korn, D. L., & Simpson, W. B. (2007). A randomized clinical trial of EMDR, fluoxetine, and pill placebo in the treatment of PTSD. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68(1), 37–46.
[21] Veronese, G., Pepe, A., Massaiu, I., De Mol, A.-S., & Robbins, I. (2017). Posttraumatic growth is related to subjective well being of aid workers exposed to cumulative trauma in Palestine. Transcultural Psychiatry, 54(3), 332–356
[22] World Health Organization. (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th ed.). Geneva: WHO.
[23] World Health Organization. (2013). Guidelines for the management of conditions specifically related to stress. Geneva: WHO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
