Clinical Outcomes Of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus High Ligation And Stripping In The Management Of Primary Lower Limb Varicose Veins: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors

  • Nisar Muhammad
  • Fazal Elahi
  • Ayesha Masood
  • Muhaddis Ahmad
  • Muhammad Marwan

Keywords:

Radiofrequency ablation, Varicose veins, High ligation, Stripping

Abstract

Background: Primary lower-limb varicose veins are a major cause of chronic limb pain, heaviness, edema, and cosmetic deformity, resulting in significant impairment of quality of life. For decades, conventional surgery with high ligation and stripping (HL/S) has been regarded as the standard treatment modality. However, endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering targeted thermal closure of incompetent veins with reduced tissue trauma, shorter recovery time, and improved postoperative comfort, thereby gaining increasing acceptance in contemporary venous practice.

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes, complication profiles, and early recurrence rates between radiofrequency ablation and high ligation with stripping in the management of primary lower-limb varicose veins.

Methodology: This retrospective cohort study included 100 adult patients treated for primary lower-limb varicose veins at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, and Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Peshawar between January 2024 and January 2025. Fifty patients underwent endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and fifty were managed with conventional high ligation and stripping (HL/S). Data were extracted from medical records and included demographic characteristics, postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stay, wound-related complications, and recurrence within six months. Patients with recurrent varicose veins, deep venous thrombosis, peripheral arterial disease, or a history of previous venous surgery were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24.0. Continuous variables were compared using independent-samples t-tests, while categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The overall mean age was 44.8 ± 11.6 years, with no significant age difference between the RFA and HL/S groups (p = 0.48). Pain scores at 24 hours were significantly lower in the RFA group (3.1 ± 1.2) than the HL/S group (5.4 ± 1.6; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was shorter following RFA (1.2 ± 0.5 days) compared with HL/S (2.6 ± 0.8 days; p < 0.001). Minor wound complications occurred in 6% of RFA patients versus 18% of HL/S patients (p = 0.04). Early recurrence was lower in the RFA group (4%) than in the HL/S group (12%), though not statistically significant (p = 0.14)

Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation is associated with superior early postoperative outcomes compared with high ligation and stripping, including significantly reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, and fewer wound-related complications, supporting its use as an effective minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgical management of primary lower-limb varicose veins.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Epstein D, Bootun R, Diop M, Ortega-Ortega M, Lane TRA, Davies AH. Cost-effectiveness analysis of current varicose veins treatments. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2022;10(2):504-13.e7.

[2] Farah MH, Nayfeh T, Urtecho M, Hasan B, Amin M, Sen I, et al. A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2022;10(5):1155-71.

[3] Florio G, Carnì P, D'Amata G, Crovaro M, Musmeci L, Manzi L, et al. Thermal ablation combined with high ligation of sapheno-femoral junction for lower limb primary varicosity. Il Giornale di chirurgia. 2019;40(5):413-6.

[4] Gao RD, Qian SY, Wang HH, Liu YS, Ren SY. Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency. World journal of clinical cases. 2022;10(18):5946-56.

[5] Hartmann K. Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations. Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete. 2020;71(Suppl 2):67-73.

[6] Kuserli Y, Kavala AA, Turkyilmaz S. Comparison of high saphenous ligation and stripping, radiofrequency ablation, and subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery for the treatment of active venous ulcers: Retrospective cohort with five-year follow-up. Vascular. 2022;30(2):375-83.

[7] Liao CJ, Song SH, Li T, Zhang Y, Zhang WD. Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy versus high ligation and stripping for the treatment of lower limb varicose veins. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2021;9(1):95-100.

[8] Vuylsteke ME, Klitfod L, Mansilha A. Endovenous ablation. International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology. 2019;38(1):22-38.

[9] Whing J, Nandhra S, Nesbitt C, Stansby G. Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021;8(8):Cd005624.

[10] Butt A, Kopriva D. Economic implications of endovenous great saphenous ablation in a public health care system. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2018;6(4):471-6.e6.

[11] González Cañas E, Florit López S, Vilagut RV, Guevara-Noriega KA, Santos Espí M, Rios J, et al. A randomized controlled noninferiority trial comparing radiofrequency with stripping and conservative hemodynamic cure for venous insufficiency technique for insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2021;9(1):101-12.

[12] Izzo L, Pugliese F, Pieretti G, Izzo S, Izzo P, Florio G, et al. High ligation of sapheno-femoral junction and thermal ablation for lower limb primary varicosity in day hospital setting. Annali italiani di chirurgia. 2020;91:61-4.

[13] Kempeneers AC, Bechter-Hugl B, Thomis S, van den Bussche D, Vuylsteke ME, Vuylsteke MM. A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, using a 1470 nm diode laser in combination with a Tulip-TipTM fiber versus radiofrequency (Closure FAST™ VNUS®), in the treatment of primary varicose veins. International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology. 2022;41(4):322-31.

[14] Kubat E, Ünal CS, Geldi O, Çetin E, Keskin A. What is the optimal treatment technique for great saphenous vein diameter of ≥10 mm? Comparison of five different approaches. Acta chirurgica Belgica. 2021;121(2):94-101.

[15] Nellis JM, Obi AT, Powell CA, Wakefield TW. Treatment and contemporary outcomes associated with adjunct tourniquet use during phlebectomy of complex, voluminous truncular varicosities. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2022;10(6):1208-14.

[16] Oliveira R, Mazzucca ACP, Pachito DV, Riera R, Baptista-Silva J. Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. 2018;136(4):324-32.

[17] Siribumrungwong B, Srikuea K, Orrapin S, Benyakorn T, Rerkasem K, Thakkinstian A. Endovenous ablation and surgery in great saphenous vein reflux: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials protocol. BMJ open. 2019;9(1):e024813.

[18] Vemulapalli S, Parikh K, Coeytaux R, Hasselblad V, McBroom A, Johnston A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with chronic lower extremity venous insufficiency and varicose veins. American heart journal. 2018;196:131-43.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-16

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad N, Elahi F, Masood A, Ahmad M, Marwan M. Clinical Outcomes Of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus High Ligation And Stripping In The Management Of Primary Lower Limb Varicose Veins: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 16 [cited 2026 Apr. 14];14(32S):10200-5. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/9813

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 32S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.