Frequency Of Perinatal Outcome Inpatients With Umbilical Cord Prolapse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.9728Keywords:
Umbilical cord prolapse, Perinatal outcomes, Preterm deliveryAbstract
Introduction: Umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) is an uncommon but potentially fatal obstetric emergency. Several risk factors for UCP have been identified. The first step in anticipating this obstetric emergency and decreasing the perinatal morbidity and mortality. Umbilical cord prolapse among pregnant women is an emergency and potentially dangerous condition, which may lead to grave consequences regarding fetal outcomes, if not properly managed. This study is designed to determine the fetal outcome among these patients, as it may help us to anticipate and educate our patients better.
Objectives: To determine the frequency of perinatal outcomes among patients having umbilical cord prolapse.
Design: Cross-sectional study
Setting: Gynecology & Obstetrics Department, Sheikh Zayed Women Hospital, Larkana.
Duration of Study: 6-months from 01-04-2020 to 30-09-2020.
Subject and Methods: Eighty two patients having umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) presenting in labour room were recruited in this study. Their demographic details including age, gestational age, parity, previous history of UCP and history of polyhydramnios was obtained. They was assessed for perinatal outcome and all the data was entered on the proforma (Attached).
Results: - The average age of the women was 26.52±5.17 years. Frequency of perinatal outcomes among patients having umbilical cord prolapse are listed in table 2. Cesarean sectionwas performed in 68.3% (56/82), preterm delivery was found as 48.8% (40/82), mortality as 18.3% (18/82), Apgar score 27 at 1 minute as 54.9% (45/82) and Apgar score 27 at 5 minute as 82.9% (68/82) in a study.
Conclusion: Umbilical cord prolapse is associated with a significant perinatal mortality in this study, especially in those with spontaneous rupture of membranes that occurred outside the hospital setting...
Downloads
References
1. Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata l, kawabata M, et al. Clinical risk factors for poor neonatal outcomes in umbilical cord prolapse. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 1652-6. 2016;29(10):1652-6.
2. Kaymak O, Iskender C, Ibanoglu M, Cavkaytar S, Uygur D, Danisman N. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse during labor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol sci. 2015;19(13):2336-9.
3. Li XY, Yu YU, Wu QQ. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes of velamentous umbilical cord insertion. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2015;37(3):355-7.
4. Rakotozanany B, Randriambololona DM, Razafimadimby Rakotomalala Randriambelomanana JA, Andrianampanalinarivo HR. Neonatal prognosis for pulsating umbilical cord prolapse at the Befelatanana hospital of Madagascar. Med Sante Trop. 2015;25(4):434-5.
5. Smit M, Zwanenburg F, van der Wolk S, Middeldorp J, Havenith B, van Roosmalen J. Umbilical cord prolapse in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands; a case series. Part 2. Pract Midwife. 2014;17(7):34-8.
6. Malik R, Khan NR, Arif A, Ayoub S, Perveen S. Common risk factors in patients with intrauterine fetal death. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2016;30(4):337-41.
7. Prusova K, Churcher L, Tyler A, Lokugamage AU. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines: how evidence-based are they? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(8):706-11.
8. Sayed Ahmed WA, Hamdy MA. Optimal management of umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:45965.
9. Adegbola O, Ayanbode O. The incidence, risk factors and determinants of perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapses in Lagos, Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2017;58(2):53-7.
10. Enakpene CA, Odukogbe AT, Morhason-Bello 10, Omigbodun AO, Arowojolu AO. The influence of healthseeking behavior on the incidence and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse in Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:177-82.
11. Traore Y, Dicko TF, Teguete B, Mulbah JK, Adjobi R, N'Guessan E. Frequency of cord prolapse: Etiological factors and fetal prognosis in 47 cases in a health center. Mali
Med. 2006;21:25-9
12. Bako B, Chama C, Audu BM. Emergency obstetrics care in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: A 20 year review of umblical cord prolapse. Niger J Clin Pract. 2009;12:232-6
13. Khan RS, Naru T, Nizami F. Umbilical cord prolapse--a review of diagnosis to delivery interval on perinatal and maternal outcome. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association: JPMA. 2010;8:6-19.
14. Kalu CA, Umeora OU. Risk factors and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse in Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2007;57(10):487.
15. Bako B, Chama C, Audu BM. Emergency obstetrics care in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: A 20 year review of umblical cord prolapse. Niger J Clin Pract. 2009;12:232-6.
16. Traore Y, Dicko TF, Teguete B, Mulbah JK, Adjobi R, N'Guessan E. Frequency of cord prolapse: Etiological factors and fetal prognosis in 47 cases in a health center. Mali
17. Nana PN, Tebeu PM, Mbu RE, Fomulu JN, Maimou NA, Leke RJ. Cord prolapse, associated factors and fetal outcome: A report of 47 cases in Yaounde Central Hospital Cameroon. Clin Morther Child Health. 2010;7:1179—82.
18. Enakpene CA, Omigbodun AO, Arowojolu AO. Perinatal mortality following umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:44-5.
19. Alouini S, Mesnard L, Megier P, Lemaire B, Coly S, Desroches A. Management of umbilical cord prolapse and neonatal outcomes. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod
(Paris) 2010;39:471-7.
20 .Kalu CA, Umeora OU. Risk factors and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse in Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6-11.
21 Tehniyat 1K, Bilqui A, Jamila JS. Cord prolapse: Experience in a tertiary care hospital of Peshawar. Middle East J Fam Med. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6-11.
22 Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL, Washington, DC: AAP, ACOG; 2002. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; p. 147.
23 The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001. [Last accessed on 2016 Feb 08]. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Units. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/orca/audit/completedaudits
24 Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Gilbert S, Hauth JC, Landon MB. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6-11.
25 Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D. National Cross Sectional Survey to determine whether decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ. 2001;322:1330-3...
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.