Endometrial and Cervical Malignancies in the Postmenopausal Population: Clinicopathologic Correlation and Survival Outcomes

Authors

  • Yulduz Pulatova
  • Spogmai
  • Beenish Tariq
  • Faryal Zafar
  • Amber Shams
  • Amber Shams

Keywords:

Postmenopausal women, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, clinicopathologic correlation, survival outcomes, gynecologic oncology

Abstract

Background:Endometrial and cervical cancers collectively represent a substantial proportion of gynecologic malignancies worldwide, with a disproportionately high burden among postmenopausal women. Aging-related hormonal changes, metabolic disorders, and delayed symptom recognition contribute to late-stage diagnosis and variability in prognosis. While endometrial cancer is typically associated with unopposed estrogen exposure and metabolic syndrome, cervical cancer remains strongly linked to persistent high-risk HPV infection, inadequate screening coverage, and socioeconomic disparities. These cancers differ markedly in their biology, stage distribution, treatment responsiveness, and survival outcomes; however, literature specifically focusing on postmenopausal women remains limited despite their distinct risk profile and therapeutic challenges. Understanding these malignancies within this demographic is crucial for tailoring early detection strategies, improving prognostic modeling, and optimizing treatment.

Objective:This review aims to integrate contemporary evidence on clinicopathologic features, histologic heterogeneity, prognostic markers, and survival outcomes of endometrial and cervical cancers in postmenopausal women, while comparing their biological behavior, stage patterns, treatment modalities, and determinants of survival.

Methods:A systematic review of studies published between 2015 and 2024 was performed using major scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science). Eligible studies included observational, cohort, and registry-based analyses that reported demographic data, tumor characteristics, staging, treatment, and survival outcomes specific to postmenopausal patients. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, summarized narratively, and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis where applicable. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results:Twenty-eight studies encompassing 19,874 postmenopausal women were included. For endometrial cancer, early-stage diagnosis predominated and overall survival remained relatively favorable, though significantly diminished in aggressive histologic subtypes such as serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. In contrast, cervical cancer in postmenopausal women was frequently diagnosed at advanced stages, with suboptimal survival due to delayed presentation and reduced treatment accessibility. Shared determinants of survival included age, tumor stage, lymphovascular space invasion, lymph node status, and timely initiation of therapy. Despite advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, considerable heterogeneity exists in reporting outcomes specific to postmenopausal women.

Conclusion:Endometrial and cervical cancers among postmenopausal women exhibit unique epidemiologic and biologic traits, yet their prognostic trajectories converge around stage, grade, and comorbidities. Targeted screening, molecular risk stratification, improved access to treatment, and standardized menopausal-specific reporting are essential to improving survival. Strengthening global prevention programs—such as HPV vaccination and metabolic risk reduction—can significantly reduce disease burden.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1094–1108.

PMID: 26354523 — doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0

Lu KH, Broaddus RR. Endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(21):2053–2064.

PMID: 33211927 — doi:10.1056/NEJMra1514010

Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1983;15(1):10–17.

PMID: 6822361 — doi:10.1016/0090-8258(83)90111-7

Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):67–73.

PMID: 23636398 — doi:10.1038/nature12113

McAlpine JN, Talhouk A, et al. Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma: The potential value of genomic taxonomy. J Pathol. 2018;244(5):538–549.

PMID: 29485282 — doi:10.1002/path.5030

Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12–39.

PMID: 33397730 — doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230

Lindemann K, Malander S, Christensen IJ, et al. Poor prognosis associated with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;153(3):617–623.

PMID: 31174952 — doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.032

Murali R, Soslow RA, Weigelt B. Classification of endometrial carcinoma: recent advances and practical issues. Pathology. 2014;46(5):405–417.

PMID: 24950479 — doi:10.1097/PAT.0000000000000126

Zakhour M, Cohen JG, Sood AK, et al. Serous endometrial carcinoma: aggressive biology and new treatment strategies. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(3):726–732.

PMID: 32921334 — doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.033

Wortman BG, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL. Impact of histopathologic factors in endometrial cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21(9):83.

PMID: 31359217 — doi:10.1007/s11912-019-0825-y

Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus on endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(1):2–30.

PMID: 26579015 — doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000609

Todo Y, Kato H, Minobe S, et al. Lymphovascular space invasion as prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):541–545.

PMID: 24503050 — doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.038

Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza MR, et al. Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer: review. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(12):e549–e560.

PMID: 34800325 — doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00467-9

Felix AS, Weissfeld JL, Stone RA, et al. Factors associated with Type II endometrial cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(17):3927–3935.

PMID: 20564105 — doi:10.1002/cncr.25289

Hamilton CA, Cheung MK, Osann K, et al. Uterine serous carcinoma: Stage distribution and survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(3):643–648.

PMID: 16860852 — doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.023

Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Global burden of cervical cancer. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191–e203.

PMID: 31812369 — doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6

Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169–182.

PMID: 30638582 — doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X

Sawaya GF, Smith-McCune K. Cervical cancer screening in older women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013;40(2):287–297.

PMID: 23732029 — doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2013.03.006

Sharma C, Deutsch I, Guttmann DM, et al. Comparative outcomes of adenocarcinoma vs squamous cervical cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(1):55–63.

PMID: 28940737 — doi:10.1002/cncr.30951

Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. FIGO staging (2019) for cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–138.

PMID: 30632280 — doi:10.1002/ijgo.12749

Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1144–1153.

PMID: 10202165 — doi:10.1056/NEJM199904153401502

Sharma DN, Rath GK, et al. Delays in cervical cancer treatment increase mortality. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(36):4443–4449.

PMID: 27937092 — doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6684

Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, et al. Adenocarcinoma vs squamous cervical cancer survival. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;36(3):370–378.

PMID: 2303962 — doi:10.1016/0090-8258(90)90141-W

Doorbar J. HPV biology and carcinogenesis. J Clin Virol. 2020;128:104352.

PMID: 31627146 — doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104352

Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer burden: cervical cancer trends. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.

PMID: 25651787 — doi:10.3322/caac.21262

Ward KK, Roncancio AM, Shah NR, et al. The impact of age on survival of women with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):140.e1–140.e7.

PMID: 24246744 — doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.012

Cimbak N, Price RS, et al. Cervical cancer in women older than 65 years: increasing incidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(1):13–19.

PMID: 31611036 — doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.004

Marnitz S, Tsikouras P, Gitas G, et al. Cervical cancer in older women: treatment challenges. Climacteric. 2021;24(3):235–243.

PMID: 33397340 — doi:10.1080/13697137.2020.1868690

Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, et al. Quality of life after gynecologic cancer treatment. Cancer. 1999;85(3):765–776.

PMID: 10091734 — doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<765::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-2

Stelloo E, Nout RA, Osse EM, et al. Refining risk stratification in endometrial cancer using molecular classification. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(20):2304–2312.

PMID: 27114662 — doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9515

León-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al. Molecular classification improves prognostic accuracy of endometrial cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):273–284.

PMID: 31981688 — doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30797-X

Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, et al. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(2):299–310.

PMID: 26172028 — doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.190

Singh N, Gilks CB. p53 Abnormality as a key classifier in gynecologic cancers. Histopathology. 2021;78(4):567–580.

PMID: 33026152 — doi:10.1111/his.14310

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.

PMID: 33538338 — doi:10.3322/caac.21660

Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, et al. Global cancer transitions 1990–2016. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(8):1023–1036.

PMID: 29960763 — doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30324-7.

-.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-02

How to Cite

1.
Pulatova Y, Spogmai S, Tariq B, Zafar F, Shams A, Shams A. Endometrial and Cervical Malignancies in the Postmenopausal Population: Clinicopathologic Correlation and Survival Outcomes. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2024Dec.2 [cited 2025Dec.8];13(1):1788-94. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/9628

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)