Morphometric variation in the human liver and its clinical implication: a cadaveric study
Keywords:
Accessory fissures, accessory lobe, Liver, Morphological Variations, Netter’s ClassificationAbstract
Background: The most frequently encountered morphological variations of the liver include alterations in its form and shape, as well as the presence of accessory lobes, accessory fissures, and atypical ligaments. Awareness of these anatomical anomalies is essential for clinicians in differentiating pathological conditions, for surgeons performing segmental liver resections, and for radiologists when interpreting hepatic imaging findings.
Objectives: This study aimed to characterize morphological variations of the liver, perform detailed morphometric analysis, and elucidate their clinical significance.
Methodology: Morphological variations of the liver—including alterations in size and shape, the presence of accessory or hypoplastic lobes, and the occurrence of fissures, notches, and grooves—were systematically documented in 42 formalin-fixed specimens. Each liver was examined for external morphology and associated variants, photographed, and the findings were recorded and tabulated. Results: Liver morphometry and morphology in the specimens revealed variable lobe dimensions, frequent accessory fissures, diaphragmatic grooves, and Type 1 predominance, highlighting significant anatomical diversity relevant for surgical and radiological considerations.
Conclusion: The findings of this study may aid surgeons and radiologists in minimizing interpretative errors and potential misdiagnoses, while also supporting the selection and planning of appropriate surgical approaches.
Downloads
References
Gray H and Williams PL. Anatomia. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1995.
. Srimani P, Saha A: Liver morphology: anatomical study about the outer aspects. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020,42:1425-1434.
. Singh HR, Rabi S: Study of morphological variations of liver in human. Transl Res Anat. 2019, 14:1-5.
. Covanţev S: Accessory liver fissures and their clinical significance. Conference: University Days. NicolaeTestemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chișinău; 2013. 14:35-39.
. Joshi SD, Joshi SS, Athavale SA: Some interesting observations on the surface features of the liver and their clinical implications. Singapore Med J. 2009, 50:715-719.
. Chaudhari HJ, Ravat MK, Vaniya VH, Bhedi AN: Morphological study of human liver and its surgical importance. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017, 11:AC09-12.
. Netter FH. Atlas de Anatomia Humana. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2000.
. Daver, G.B., et al. “Bifid liver in a patient with diaphragmatic hernia.” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology: Official Journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology Vol. 24, No. 1, 2005, pp. 27-28.
. Gupta, Madhur, Lavina Sodhi, and T.D. Yadav. “Morphology of liver.” Indian Journal of Surgery Vol. 70, No.1, 2008, pp. 3-7.
. Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes, and Giuseppe D’Ippolito. “Helical computed tomography of hepatic pseudolesions: a pictorial essay.” Radiologia Brasileira Vol. 36, No. 4, 2003, pp. 229-235.
. Raut A, Singh R, Sharma S. Morphometric study of liver lobes in adult human cadavers. Int J Anat Res. 2016;4(3):2470–2475.
12. Singh V, Garg K. Morphological variations and morphometry of liver lobes in North Indian population. Anat Cell Biol. 2017;50(2):121–127.
. Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. 42nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2021.
. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
Joshi SD, Muktyaz H, Nema U. Morphological variations of human liver: a cadaveric study. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(3):4375–4380.
. Patil S. Anatomical study of variations in human liver. J Anat Soc India. 2018;67(2):121–6.
. Singh B, Srivastava R, Rabi R. Morphological variations of liver: clinical and surgical significance. Anat Cell Biol. 2019;52(1):28–34.
. Chin V, Tan YH, Cheong WF. Fissures and accessory lobes of the liver: a cadaveric study. Singapore Med J. 2015;56(7):407–411.
. Nayak BS. Anatomical study of pons hepatis and liver variations in cadavers. Clin Anat. 2016;29(5):606–612.
. Shweta S, Chaudhari P. Variations in hepatic morphology: a clinical perspective. J Clin Diagn. Res. 2017;11(10):AC01–AC05.
. Mansur S, Sharma A. Morphometric study of liver lobes and fissures in adult cadavers. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2015;4(3):574–579.
. Chaudhari P, Singh A, Rabi R. Accessory lobes and anomalies of the liver: implications in surgery. Anat Res Int. 2016;2016:728-749.
. Neginhal S, Sharma S. Pons hepatis: anatomical variations and clinical significance. Indian J Surg. 2014;76(4):297–301.
. Srivastava R, Sharma A, Singh B. Anatomical variations of the liver: imaging and surgical relevance. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2018;40(6):635–644.
. Nagato T, et al. Anatomical variations of liver lobes and fissures: clinical significance. Clin Anat. 2015;28:982–988.
. Sachin S, et al. Cadaveric study on liver morphology and its variations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12:AC01–AC04.
. Sangeeta P, et al. Morphological variants of liver and their clinical implications. Int J Anat Res. 2019;7:6761–6765.
. Mehrae R, et al. Morphological variations of the human liver: a cadaveric study. Anat Sci Int. 2017;92:123–130...
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
