“Comparison of Fluoride Recharge and Re-Release among Glass Ionomer, Compomer, and Giomer’’

Authors

  • Sheikh Muhammad Abdul Quader
  • Abdullah Al Mahmud
  • Laila Akter Banu

Keywords:

Fluoride release, Fluoride recharge, Glass ionomer, Compomer, Giomer, Restorative materials

Abstract

Background: Fluoride-releasing restorative materials play a crucial role in preventing secondary caries by providing sustained fluoride release and recharge capacity. This study aimed to compare the fluoride release and recharge behavior of glass ionomer, compomer, and giomer restorative materials.

Methods: In this in vitro study, standardized samples of glass ionomer, compomer, and giomer were prepared and immersed in deionized water. Fluoride release was measured on days 1, 3, 6 (before recharge), and days 7, 10, and 13 (after fluoride recharge). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with multiple pairwise comparisons to determine differences among the materials.

Results: Glass ionomer consistently exhibited the highest fluoride release at all time points (8.538 ± 1.282 µg/cm² on day 1; 0.904 ± 0.060 µg/cm² on day 13 after recharge), followed by compomer and giomer. Differences among the materials were statistically significant (p < 0.001) at each measurement, with pairwise comparisons confirming superior performance of glass ionomer. Fluoride release decreased over time for all materials, but glass ionomer maintained higher levels even after repeated fluoride recharge. Compomer and giomer showed lower initial release but retained measurable recharge potential.

Conclusion: Glass ionomer demonstrated superior fluoride release and recharge capacity, suggesting enhanced caries-preventive benefits, particularly for high-risk patients or restorations requiring sustained fluoride availability. Compomer and giomer, while less potent, remain viable alternatives when esthetic and mechanical considerations are prioritized

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Francci C, Deaton TG, Arnold RR, Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Bawden JW. Fluoride Release from Restorative Materials and its Effects on Dentin Demineralization. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1647.

Soler JI, Ellacuria J, Triana R, Guinea E, Osborne JW. A History of Dental Amalgam. J Hist Dent. 2002;50:109–116.

Hyson JM. Amalgam: Its History and Perils. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34:215–229.

Bayne SC. Beginnings of the Dental Composite Revolution. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144:42S–46S.

Wilson AD. Glass-Ionomer Cement Origins, Development and Future. Clin Mater. 1991;7:275–282.

Nicholson JW. The History and Background to Glass-Ionomer Dental Cements. In: Glass-Ionomers in Dentistry. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 1–24.

Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Aksoy A, Ertas E, Guvenc D, Ozere S. Fluoride release and recharge from different materials used as fissure sealants. Eur J Dent. 2010;4:245–250.

Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:296–304.

Preston AJ, Agalamanyi EA, Higham SM, Mair LH. The recharge of esthetic dental restorative materials with fluoride in vitro – two years’ results. Dent Mater. 2003;19:32–37.

Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Vreven J. Fluoride release from glass–ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:26–32.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60:93–97.

Behrend B, Geurtsen W. Long-term effects of four extraction media on the fluoride release from four polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and one resin-modified glass–ionomer cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:631–637.

Preston AJ, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA, Mair LH. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:936–940.

Vieira AR, De Souza IP, Modesto A. Fluoride uptake and release by composites and glass ionomers in a high caries challenge situation. Am J Dent. 1999;12:14–18.

Gao W, Smales RJ. Fluoride release/uptake of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers, and compomers. J Dent. 2001;29:301–306.

Attar N, Onen A. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:791–798.

Lohbauer U. Dental Glass Ionomer Cements as Permanent Filling Materials? — Properties, Limitations and Future Trends. Materials. 2009;3:76–96.

Almuhaiza M. Glass-Ionomer Cements in Restorative Dentistry: A Critical Appraisal. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17:331–336.

Marković D, Perić T, Mandić J, Petrović B. Prophylactic properties of fluoride-releasing dental materials. Metalurgija. 2008;14:111–120.

Garcez RM, Buzalaf MA, de Araújo PA. Fluoride release of six restorative materials in water and pH-cycling solutions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15:406–411.

Bansal R, Bansal T. A comparative evaluation of the amount of fluoride release and re-release after recharging from aesthetic restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC11.

Takahashi K, Emilson CG, Birkhed D. Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer cements and resin composites after exposure to NaF solution. Dent Mater. 1993;9:350–354.

Yap AUJ, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK. Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27:259–265.

Can-Karabulut DC, Batmaz İ, Solak H, Taştekin M. Linear regression modeling to compare fluoride release profiles of various restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1057–1065.

Dhull KS, Nandlal B. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from PRG Composites and compomer on application of topical fluoride: An in-vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27:27–32.

Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Karantakis P, Papadogiannis Y, Kapetanios H. Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:156–164.

Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW, Swift EJ. Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater. 1995;11:96–101.

Freedman R, Difenderfer KE. Effects of daily fluoride exposures on fluoride release by glass ionomer based restoratives. Oper Dent. 2003;28:178–185.

Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride releasing materials. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2451–2461.

Bell A, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Saunders WP. The effect of saliva on fluoride release by a glass-ionomer filling material. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:407–412.

Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2003;28:395–402.

Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater. 2004;20:789–795.

Naoum S, Ellakwa A, Martin F, Swain M. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites. Oper Dent. 2011;36:422–432.

.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-04

How to Cite

1.
Abdul Quader SM, Mahmud AA, Banu LA. “Comparison of Fluoride Recharge and Re-Release among Glass Ionomer, Compomer, and Giomer’’. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 4 [cited 2026 Mar. 3];11:36-44. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/9486

Issue

Section

Original Article