Anatomical Variations of the Aortic Arch and Their Surgical Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v13i1.9155Keywords:
Aortic arch, Bovine arch, Aberrant subclavian artery, Anatomical variation, Cardiothoracic surgery, Preoperative planningAbstract
Background: To determine the frequency of aortic arch types and branching pattern variations in a cohort of patients and assess their surgical relevance.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 72 patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) or surgical exploration between June 2023 and June 2024. Arch types (I–III) and branching patterns (classic three-branch, bovine arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, vertebral origin variants, right-sided arch) were classified. Surgical outcomes including operative time, intraoperative adjustments, and complications were analyzed.
Results: Type I arch was most frequent (63.9%), followed by Type II (23.6%) and Type III (12.5%). Classic branching pattern was seen in 62.5% of participants, while 37.5% had variations, most commonly bovine arch (20.8%). Patients with variant branching had significantly longer mean operative time (215 ± 30 min vs. 188 ± 25 min, p = 0.03) and required more intraoperative adjustments (p = 0.04), though rates of stroke and 30-day mortality were not significantly different.
Conclusion: Aortic arch variations are relatively common and have measurable effects on surgical complexity. Preoperative imaging and individualized planning are critical to reducing operative challenges and optimizing outcomes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Murray, A. and E.A.J.I.J.o.M.S. Meguid, Anatomical variation in the branching pattern of the aortic arch: a literature review. 2023. 192(4): p. 1807-1817.
Pandalai, U., et al., Anatomical variations of the aortic arch: a computerized tomography-based study. 2021. 13(2).
Bae, S.B., et al., Aortic arch variants and anomalies: embryology, imaging findings, and clinical considerations. 2022. 30(4): p. 231.
Rylski, B., et al. Aortic arch anatomy in candidates for aortic arch repair. in Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2022. Elsevier.
Prabhu, S., et al., Anatomic classification of the right aortic arch. 2020. 30(11): p. 1694-1701.
Açar, G., et al., Anatomical variations of the aortic arch branching pattern using CT angiography: a proposal for a different morphological classification with clinical relevance. 2022. 97(1): p. 65-78.
Yousef, S., et al., Variants of the aortic arch in adult general population and their association with thoracic aortic aneurysm disease. 2021. 36(7): p. 2348-2354.
Prabhu, S., et al., The aortic arch in tetralogy of Fallot: types of branching and clinical implications. 2020. 30(8): p. 1144-1150.
Natsis, K., et al., A systematic classification of the left-sided aortic arch variants based on cadaveric studies' prevalence. 2021. 43(3): p. 327-345.
Mantri, S.S., et al., Aortic arch anomalies, embryology and their relevance in neuro-interventional surgery and stroke: A review. 2022. 28(4): p. 489-498.
Harky, A., et al., The aortic pathologies: how far we understand it and its implications on thoracic aortic surgery. 2021. 36: p. 535-549.
Kowalczyk, K.A. and A.J.T.R.i.A. Majewski, Analysis of surgical errors associated with anatomical variations clinically relevant in general surgery. Review of the literature. 2021. 23: p. 100107.
di Gioia, C.R.T., et al., Thoracic aorta: anatomy and pathology. 2023. 13(13): p. 2166.
Lu, H., L.-c. Huang, and L.-w.J.F.i.C.M. Chen, Endovascular surgery for thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. 2022. 9: p. 927592.
Botou, A., et al., Anatomical variations of the left subclavian artery and their significance in clinical practice. 2020. 30(1).
Saniotis, A. and M.J.A.J.o.S. Henneberg, Anatomical variations and evolution: re‐evaluating their importance for surgeons. 2021. 91(5): p. 837-840.
Tasdemir, R., et al., Anatomical variations in aortic arch branching pattern: A computed tomography angiography study. 2023. 15(3).
Conway, A.M., et al., Complexity of aortic arch anatomy affects the outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting. 2020. 67: p. 78-89.
Tesfamariam, H., et al., Anatomical branching patterns of the aortic arch in Ethiopia: An imaging-based study. 2021. 18(4): p. 235-240.
Marquis, K.M., et al., CT of postoperative repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. 2021. 41(5): p. 1300-1320.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.