Promoting Sustainability and Social Responsibility Through HRM in Neonatal Surgical Care
Keywords:
Human Resource Management (HRM), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Sustainability, Green HRM, Ethical Leadership, Neonatal Surgical CareAbstract
The role of Human Resource Management (HRM) in promoting sustainability and social responsibility has become increasingly significant in the healthcare sector, especially within neonatal surgical care where ethical, environmental, and patient-centered practices are paramount. This paper explores the strategic integration of HRM practices in advancing sustainability and fostering a socially responsible culture in neonatal surgical settings. By examining how core HR functions—such as recruitment, training, performance management, and employee engagement—can be tailored to support sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) objectives in neonatal care, this study emphasizes HRM's vital role in enhancing patient outcomes, workforce well-being, and community trust. Through a review of literature and healthcare-specific case studies, the research identifies effective HRM strategies that promote green practices, ethical leadership development, and social outreach within neonatal surgical units. The study also addresses the unique challenges and ethical considerations of implementing sustainable HRM in the high-stakes, resource-intensive environment of neonatal surgery. Findings suggest that healthcare organizations that proactively align HRM with CSR and sustainability not only contribute to societal and environmental well-being but also benefit from improved employee morale, enhanced organizational reputation, and strengthened patient trust. This paper provides practical insights for HR professionals and healthcare leaders seeking to build socially responsible, sustainable, and patient-focused neonatal surgical care teams..
Downloads
References
Ahmad, S. (2015). Green human resource management: Policies and practices. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1030817. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1030817
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2005). Talentship and the new paradigm for human resource management: From professional practices to strategic talent decision science. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20054
Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2017). Human resource management: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brio, J. Á., Fernandez, E., & Junquera, B. (2007). Management and employee involvement in achieving an environmental action-based competitive advantage: An empirical study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 491–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601178687
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Cohen, E., Taylor, S., & Muller-Camen, M. (2012). HR’s role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Society for Human Resource Management.
Daily, B. F., & Huang, S. C. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110410892
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and organizational psychology: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00144
Jackson, S. E., Renwick, D. W., Jabbour, C. J., & Muller-Camen, M. (2011). State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 25(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_2011_02_Jackson
Jabbour, C. J. C. (2013). Environmental training and environmental management maturity of Brazilian companies with ISO14001: Empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.035
Kim, S., & Scullion, H. (2013). The effect of corporate social responsibility on employees’ attitudes and behaviors: A framework for research. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 34(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1796
McShane, L., & Cunningham, P. (2012). To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1064-x
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x
Story, J. S. P., & Castanheira, F. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: Mediation role of job satisfaction and organisational identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12230
Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x
Zibarras, L. D., & Coan, P. (2015). HRM practices used to promote pro-environmental behavior: A UK survey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(16), 2121–2142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.972429
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
