Prognostic Factor Of Local Recurrence, Metastasis, And Survival Rate In Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of The Lip, Ear, Skin And Comparison Of Retreatment Rotary Files And Ultrasonics For Removing Gutta Percha
Keywords:
OSSC, Lip, Ear, Skin, Rotary, Ultrasonics and Gutta PerchaAbstract
Background: This study was conducted to assess the prognostic factors of local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rate in squamous cell carcinoma of the lip, ear, skin and comparison of retreatment rotary files and ultrasonics for removing gutta percha.
Material and methods: In this study, there were 50 cases of squamous cell carcinoma and 50 mandibular premolars with single canal for removing gutta percha had been gathered. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic factors for recurrence, metastasis and survival rate of squamous cell carcinoma of ear, skin and lips. The other goal of this study was to assess the comparison of retreatment rotary files and ultrasonics for removing gutta percha. The findings of the carcinoma cases had been studied and tabulated. For retreatment, two groups were made based on the technique of removing gutta percha. The first group comprised of 25 teeth in which ultrasonics were used and the 2nd group comprised of 25 cases in which Neo Endo retreatment rotary files were used. After cleaning all the teeth with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, the canals were dried and obturation was done using AH Plus sealer. Neo endo retreatment files and ultrasonics were used to remove the gutta percha. To assess the remaining restoration material in the canals, stereomicroscopic evaluation was done under 100x magnification. The findings had been tabulated. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
Results: Tumor size of over 2 cm was seen in 21 cases. This was the most common prognostic factor for recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma. Depth of invasion of over 14 mm was seen in 14 cases. Undifferentiated tumors were also one of the reasons in 11 cases. Perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion were seen in 5 and 1 case, respectively. It was observed that no modality removed the entire gutta percha from the canal. However, ultrasonics removed more amount of material form the canal in comparison to Neo Endo retreatment rotary files.
Conclusion: The chief prognostic factor for recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of, ear and akin was found to be the larger tumor size. Other factors were perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion and undifferentiated tumor. For removing the gutta percha, ultrasonics proved to be better than retreatment rotary files as the remaining amount of material was more when it was removed using retreatment rotary files.
Downloads
References
Chamoli A., Gosavi A.S., Shirwadkar U.P., Wangdale K.V., Behera S.K., Kurrey N.K., Kalia K., Mandoli A. Overview of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Risk factors, mechanisms, and diagnostics. Oral Oncol. 2021;121:105451.
Bugshan A., Farooq I. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Metastasis, potentially associated malignant disorders, etiology and recent advancements in diagnosis. F1000Research. 2020;9:229.
Liu K., Lin C., Zhang L. Novel Prediction Models for Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma at Different Anatomical Sites. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79:2358–2369.
Peres M.A., Macpherson L.M.D., Weyant R.J., Daly B., Venturelli R., Mathur M.R., Listl S., Celeste R.K., Guarnizo-Herreño C.C., Kearns C., et al. Oral diseases: A global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394:249–260.
Al Feghali K.A., Ghanem A.I., Burmeister C., Chang S.S., Ghanem T., Keller C., Siddiqui F. Impact of smoking on pathological features in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2019;15:582–588.
Allanson BM, Low TH, Clark JR, Gupta R. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the External Auditory Canal and Temporal Bone: An Update. Head Neck Pathol. 2018 Sep;12(3):407-418.
Nair PN. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: A review. Int Endod J 2006;39:249 81.
Kasam S, Mariswamy AB. Efficacy of different methods for removing root canal filling material in retreatment – An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:C06 10. 6.
Das S, De Ida A, Das S, Nair V, Saha N, Chattopadhyay S. Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2017;20:311 6.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: A hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007;33:391 8.
Kasam S, Mariswamy AB. Efficacy of different methods for removing root canal filling material in retreatment – An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:C06 10.
Koçak MM, Koçak S, Türker SA, Sağlam BC. Cleaning efficacy of reciprocal and rotary systems in the removal of root canal filling material. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:184 8.
Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26:210 6.
Louredo BV, Vargas PA, Pérez-de-Oliveira ME, Lopes MA, Kowalski LP, Curado MP. Epidemiology and survival outcomes of lip, oral cavity, and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in a southeast Brazilian population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022 May 1;27(3):e274-e284.
Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod 2008;34:1370 3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.