Comparative Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Perineal And Transrectal Prostate Biopsy In The Diagnosis Of Prostate Cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.7562Abstract
In this paper, we conducted a comparative study of the effectiveness of two methods of prostate biopsy — perineal and transrectal — in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The analysis of the biopsy results of 275 patients with suspected oncopathology allowed us to assess the diagnostic accuracy, the frequency of detection of clinically significant cancer, as well as the complication profile of each method. The data obtained indicate a comparable sensitivity of both approaches, however, perineal biopsy demonstrated a lower risk of infectious complications and better tolerability. The results of the study confirm the expediency of using perineal biopsy in routine clinical practice, especially in patients with a high risk of infections or after unsuccessful transrectal biopsy. The work enriches modern ideas about choosing the optimal method for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and contributes to improving the safety and accuracy of patient examination.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Grummet J. P., Virakun M., Huang S. et al. (2014). Transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. BJU International, 115 (1), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12698
Kasivisvanathan V., Rannikko A. S., Borgi M. et al. (2018). MRI is a targeted or standard biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (19), 1767-1777. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801993
Drost, F. J. H., Osses, D. F., Niebuhr, D. et al. (2019). An MRI scan of the prostate, with or without an MRI-guided biopsy, and a systematic biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2
Loeb S., Vellekup A., Ahmed H. U. and others (2013). A systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. European Urology, 64(6), 876-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049
Pepe, P., Garoufi, A., Priolo, G. and Pennisi, M. (2020). Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted biopsy during MRI/fusion: the frequency of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Clinical cancer of the genitourinary system, 18 (4), e511–e515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.012
Olivier J., Pierrard R., De Vischer P. (2019). Transperineal biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia: current state. World Journal of Urology, 37 (6), 1067-1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2454-7
Tewari, A., Rao, S., Gaffney, K. et al. (2020). A promising comparison of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy using multiparametric MRI techniques. Journal of Urology, 204 (3), 570-576. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001034
Jones P., Rai B. P., Abumarzuk O. et al. (2021). Is transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia a safe and acceptable procedure? A systematic review. Prostate cancer and prostate diseases, 24 (2), 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-00293-2
Recommendations of the European Union of Urologists. The 2024 edition. Presented at the annual Congress of the European Union of Urology in Milan in 2024. European Association of Urologists. https://uroweb.org/guidelines
Sevryuk, V. I., Leshchenko, A. A., Ilyukhin, S. A. and others (2022). Perineal biopsy of the prostate gland: current opportunities and prospects. Oncourology, 18(2), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-2-40-48
Ivanov, A.V., Nesterov, A. I., & Malyshev, A. O. (2021). The role of MRI fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology, 4, 55-61.
Pshenichnikova, T. B., Livshits, A. B., & Kochetkov, A.V. (2020). Prostate cancer diagnosis: possibilities and limitations of various biopsy methods. Russian Journal of Oncology, 28(2), 23-30.
Bazhanov, V. V., Petrov, S. A., & Lapin, S. A. (2019). Comparison of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies. Practical Oncology, 20(3), 41-45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdullaev Radjab Arsenovich, Magomedova Saniyat Adelevna, Radjabova Aminat Radjabovna, Gamidova Patimat Hasanovna, Ramazanova Inga Kurbanovna, Magomedova Patimat Saipudinovna, Abdullaeva Aminat Zaurovna, Murtuzalieva Asiyat Murtuzalievna, Isalabdulaeva Patimat Kurbanovna, Gadzhieva Aishat Kasumbekovna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
