Comparative Study of Carrying Angle Between Dominant and Non-Dominant Limbs in Central Indian Paediatric Population

Authors

  • Yatharth Mishra
  • Avantika Bamne
  • Sumit Kumar
  • Chandramani Yadav

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.7542

Keywords:

Carrying angle, dominant limb, non-dominant limb, goniometer

Abstract

Introduction –When the arm is supinated and the elbow joint is fully extended, the forearm remains laterally deflected and not in a straight line with the arm. This leads to the formation of an angle between the long axis of the arm and the long axis of forearm, which is referred to as the carrying angle (CA) of the elbow. The evidence in literature falls short when comparing sexual dimorphism regarding CA and comparing dominant with non-dominant hand. Thus, the present study aimed at measuring the CA between dominant and non-dominant limb in both girls and boys.

Material And Methods – CA was measured in 504 paediatric school going children of both sexes using a manual goniometer. All the subjects were categorised into four separate groups according to age (Group I – 6-8 years; Group II – 9-10 years; Group III – 11-12 years; Group IV – 13-14 years) and the observations were recorded accordingly. Statistical calculations, Student’s t-test, were done using Prism software.

Result- Present study showed significant difference in CA between dominant and non-dominant limb in both the sexes and in all the four groups.

Conclusion – The result of our study could be useful in gaining more insight in measurement of carrying angle and its variation between dominant and non-dominant limb while evaluating traumatic elbow injuries in childhood and adolescence and other elbow disorders requiring reconstruction or arthroplasties..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

AÇıKGÖZ, A. K.; BALCI, R. S.; GÖKER, P. & BOZKIR, M. G. Evaluation of the elbow carrying angle in healthy individuals. Int. J. Morphol., 2018, 36(1):135-139.

Braune, W. & Kyrklund. Cubitus valgus. Arch. Anat. Physiol., S:321, 1879.

Mikulicz J von (1876) Cubitus valgus. Arch Klin Chir 29:767

Paraskevas G, Papadopoulos A, Papaziogas B, Spanidou S, Argiriadou H, Gigis J. Study of the carrying angle of the human elbow joint in full extension: a morphometric analysis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004; 26:19-23.

Shah SJ, Bashir AS, Shaheen S, Sheikh MS, Sobiya. Morphometric measurements of carrying angle of elbows and its association with gender and height among Kashmiri population: A cross-sectional study. JMSCR 2018, 06(09):1092-1098.

Rajesh B, Reshma VR, Jaene RC, Somasekhar IT, Vaithilingam A. An evaluation of the carrying angle of the elbow joint in adolescents. Int J Med Biomed Res. 2013; 2(3):221-225.

Tükenmez M, Demirel H, Perçin S, Tezeren G. [Measurement of the carrying angle of the elbow in 2,000 children at ages six and fourteen years]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38:274-6.

Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al., editors. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice 40 ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.

Snell RS. Clinical Anatomy by Regions, 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2012: 408.

Beals RK. The normal carrying angle of the elbow. A radiographic study of 422 patients. ClinOrthopRelat Res. 1976;(119):194-6.

Sharma S.K., Siddiqui S.W., Correlation of carrying angle of elbow with length of forearm and height of body. Int.J.Med.Sci.Educ 2019;6(4):41-43.

Kushwaha N, Verma V, Singh A, et al. (May 30, 2022) A Study of Factors Associated With Carrying Angle of the Human Elbow in Pediatric Age Group. Cureus 14(5): e25478. DOI 10.7759/cureus.25478.

Terra BB, Silva BCM, Carvalho HBF, Dobashi ET, Pinto JA, Ishida A. Evolution of the carrying angle of the elbow: a clinical and radiographic study. Acta Ortop Bras. [online]. 2011;19(2):79-82. Available from URL: http://www.scielo.br/aob

Mudasir Ahmad Bhat, Tanveer Ahmad Bhat, Parvez Ahmad Ganie, Wajahat Ahmad Mir. Comparative study of carrying angle between dominant and non dominanat limb in Kashmiri population. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2019; 6(6):F1-F3.

Sharma AK, Jabeen N, Magotra R, Choudhary S. A Study of Carrying Angle of Elbow Among Young Adults of Jammu & Kashmir. JK Science 2019; 21(2):52-54

Bari W, Alam M, Omar S. Goniometry of elbow carrying angle: a comparative clinical study on sexual dimorphism in young males and females. Int J Res Med Sci 2015;3:3482-4.

Lim V, Jacob NA, Ghani MFS, Wang DC, K AD. An Anthropometric Study on the Carrying Angle of Elbow among Young Adults of Various Ethinicities in Malaysia NJIRM. 2014 5(6):20-3.

Balasubramanian P, Madhuri V, Muliyil J. Carrying angle in children: a normative study. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15(1):37-40.

Golden DW, Jhee JT, Gilpin SP, Sawyer JR. Elbow range of motion and clinical carrying angle in a healthy pediatric population. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16:144-9.

Khare GN, Goel SC, Saraf SK, Singh G, Mohanty C. New observations on carrying angle. Indian J Med Sci. 1999;53:61-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-20

How to Cite

1.
Mishra Y, Bamne A, Kumar S, Yadav C. Comparative Study of Carrying Angle Between Dominant and Non-Dominant Limbs in Central Indian Paediatric Population. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.20 [cited 2025Jul.15];14(32S):1254-8. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7542