Assessment of the Role of Luteal Phase Antagonist in Women at High-risk of Developing Ovarian Hyper-Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS) Receiving GnRH Agonist Trigger

Authors

  • Ahmed Bakry
  • Passant Mohammed Mohammed
  • Amal Shohayeb Ahmed Mohamed
  • Manal Mohamed Kamal
  • Radwa Mohamed Fahmy
  • M.A. Abdelsalam
  • Amr Samir Fouad Tamam
  • Maha Al-husseiny

Abstract

Background: Ovarian hyperstimulation (OHSS) is a serious complication of assisted reproductive technology (ART). This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of luteal phase cetrotide, administered for 3 days starting on the day of oocyte retrieval, on the incidence of mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in females at high risk for the development of OHSS who receive the GnRH antagonist induction protocol.

Patients and methods: The study included 110 infertile women candidates for IVF at high risk for OHSS, randomized into two cohorts: the cetrotide cohort (n=55) and the control (no-cetrotide) cohort (n=55). All participants received the conventional antagonist protocol, followed by the freeze policy. The control cohort received traditional symptomatic treatment. In addition to symptomatic treatment, the study cohort received a subcutaneous injection of cetrorelix acetate; all patients underwent clinical evaluation on days 0, 3, and 5. Then, on day 5 after oocyte retrieval, all patients underwent ultrasound scanning for ascites grading and maximum ovarian diameter (MOD). We took blood samples to determine the level of VEGF.

Results: The results indicated that patients in both groups exhibited non-significant differences in terms of age, BMI, ovarian serum E2 on the day of trigger, and number of oocytes retrieved (P > 0.05). Day 3 VAS pain scores were significantly lower in both groups than the Day 0 scores (P = 0.000). On day 5, we found a statistically significant difference in MOD (P=0.000). Additionally, serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels on day -5 showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.000). The incidence of mild and moderate OHSS syndrome was significantly lower in the cetrotide cohort than in the control cohort (9.1% and 32.7%, respectively; P = 0.005).

Conclusion: Administering the GnRH antagonist (cetrotide) during the luteal phase decreased the severity and frequency of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome symptoms in high-risk females with all embryos cryopreserved. Cetrotide may work by directly affecting the ovary, which could lead to lower levels of a substance called serum vascular endothelial growth factor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Williams SC, Gibbons WE, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S. Minimal ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization using sequential clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin with or without the addition of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1068–72.

Zhang J, Chang L, Sone Y, Silber S. Minimal ovarian stimulation (mini-IVF) for IVF utilizing vitrification and cryopreserved embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Oct;21(4):485–95.

Mohsen IA, El Din RE. Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI. Gynecol Endocrinol Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Feb;29(2):105–8.

Shrestha D, La X, Feng HL. Comparison of different stimulation protocols used in in vitro fertilization: a review. Ann Transl Med. 2015 Jun;3(10):137.

Franco JG, Baruffi RLR, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Felipe V, Cornicelli J, et al. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in poor ovarian responders: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Nov;13(5):618–27.

Daya S. Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001299.

van Loenen ACD, Huirne JAF, Schats R, Hompes PGA, Lambalk CB. GnRH agonists, antagonists, and assisted conception. Semin Reprod Med. 2002 Nov;20(4):349–64.

Kara M, Aydin T, Aran T, Turktekin N, Ozdemir B. Comparison of GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols in normoresponder patients who had IVF-ICSI. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1413–6.

Grow D, Kawwass JF, Kulkarni AD, Durant T, Jamieson DJ, Macaluso M. GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols: comparison of outcomes among good-prognosis patients using national surveillance data. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Sep;29(3):299–304.

Khalaf M, Mittre H, Levallet J, Hanoux V, Denoual C, Herlicoviez M, et al. GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols in ovarian stimulation: differential regulation pathway of aromatase expression in human granulosa cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jul;21(1):56–65.

Lai Q, Zhang H, Zhu G, Li Y, Jin L, He L, et al. Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(9):1903–10.

Humaidan P, Quartarolo J, Papanikolaou EG. Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):389–400.

Tarlatzis BC, Griesinger G, Leader A, Rombauts L, Ijzerman-Boon PC, Mannaerts BMJL. Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Apr;24(4):410–9.

Aflatoonian A, Mansoori-Torshizi M, Farid Mojtahedi M, Aflatoonian B, Khalili MA, Amir-Arjmand MH, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: A randomized, multi-center study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jan;16(1):9–18.

Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Makris AA, Xenariou MV, Petsas GK, Kolibianakis EM. Follicular flushing increases the number of oocytes retrieved: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2023 Oct 3;38(10):1927–37.

Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Venetis CA, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Alexopoulou E, et al. Ultrasound and hematological changes during early luteal phase in women at high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):126–33.

Lainas T, Sfontouris I, Zorzovilis I, Petsas G, Lainas G, Iliadis G, et al. Management of severe OHSS using GnRH antagonist and blastocyst cryopreservation in PCOS patients treated with long protocol. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jan 1;18(1):15–20.

Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Alexopoulou E, et al. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2010 Mar;25(3):683–9.

RCOG [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 15]. Green-top Guidelines. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/

Fiedler K, Ezcurra D. Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE. 2012 Apr 24;10:32.

Chen CD, Wu MY, Chao KH, Lien YR, Chen SU, Yang YS. Update on management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar 1;50(1):2–10.

Cheng W, Li H, Zhou F, Zhu B, Yu J, Ding Z. Cryopreservation of Pleione bulbocodioides (Franch.) Rolfe protocorm-like bodies by vitrification. Acta Physiol Plant. 2020 May;42(5):82.

Salama KM, Abo Ragab HM, El Sherbiny MF, Morsi AA, Souidan II. Sequential E2 levels not ovarian maximal diameter estimates were correlated with outcome of cetrotide therapy for management of women at high-risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized controlled study. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):108.

Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas TG, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels following luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist administration in women with severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jun;121(7):848–55.

Hosseini MA, Mahdavi A, Aleyasin A, Safdarian L, Bahmaee F. Treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist: a pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012 Nov;28(11):853–5.

Bonilla-Musoles FM, Raga F, Castillo JC, Sanz M, Dolz M, Osborne N. High doses of GnRH antagonists are efficient in the management of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2009;36(2):78–81.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

1.
Bakry A, Mohammed PM, Mohamed ASA, Kamal MM, Fahmy RM, Abdelsalam M, Tamam ASF, Al-husseiny M. Assessment of the Role of Luteal Phase Antagonist in Women at High-risk of Developing Ovarian Hyper-Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS) Receiving GnRH Agonist Trigger. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.24 [cited 2025Jul.19];14(32S). Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7441