A Study of Complications and Immediate Outcome of Vlbw and Elbw Babies Admitted in Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Udarapu Sambasiva Rao
  • Sabu Richard Abraham

Keywords:

N\A

Abstract

Background: Very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1000 g) infants represent a high-risk group with increased susceptibility to a wide range of neonatal complications and poor outcomes. These conditions remain critical indicators of perinatal health and care quality.

Aim: To assess the complications and immediate outcomes in VLBW and ELBW neonates admitted to a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted over 18 months at Krishna Hospital, Karad. A total of 126 neonates (105 VLBW and 21 ELBW) were enrolled. Maternal and neonatal variables were recorded, including gestational age, birth weight, clinical complications, and outcomes. Data were analyzed and compared between the VLBW and ELBW groups.

Results: Of 3,703 total births, 126 (3.4%) were either VLBW or ELBW. Male infants constituted 53.2% of the study population. The majority were small for gestational age (64%). Mean gestational age and birth weight were 31.9 weeks/1272.8 g for VLBW and 28.5 weeks/898.4 g for ELBW infants. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was the most common complication (78.5%), particularly in ELBW infants (90.4%). Other major morbidities included neonatal jaundice (80.2%), sepsis (22.2%), apnea of prematurity (32.5%), intraventricular hemorrhage (31.7%), and retinopathy of prematurity (22.2%). Metabolic disturbances such as hypoglycemia (12.6%), hypocalcemia (especially in ELBW: 33.3%), and dyselectrolytemia were also observed. ELBW infants experienced significantly higher complication rates across nearly all parameters.

Overall, 74.7% of neonates recovered, with a markedly better recovery rate in VLBW (81.6%) compared to ELBW (33.3%) infants. The overall mortality rate was 19.8%, with 12.7% in VLBW and 61.9% in ELBW groups.

Conclusion: The study underscores the heightened vulnerability of ELBW infants to complications such as RDS, IVH, and sepsis, translating into significantly higher mortality. Early detection, specialized neonatal care, and targeted preventive strategies are essential to improve outcomes in these high-risk neonates

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172.

World Health Organization. Preterm birth: fact sheet. 2018. Available from: [URL] [Accessed 2023].

Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737.

UNICEF. Low birthweight: country, regional and global estimates. UNICEF; 2021.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2022.

Lawn JE, Kinney M, Lee AC, et al. Reducing intrapartum-related neonatal deaths in low- and middle-income countries—What works? Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(5):395–407.

Bhutta ZA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE, et al. Stillbirths: what difference can we make and at what cost? Lancet. 2011;377(9776):1523–1538.

Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–868.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2007.

March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: WHO; 2012.

Kramer MS, Demissie K, Yang H, et al. Regional variations in very low birth weight rates: role of maternal characteristics. Pediatr Res. 2000;48(3):354–360.

Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2):147.e1–147.e8.

Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. Intensive care for extreme prematurity—moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2474–2481.

Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):e892–e900.

Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, et al. Do clinical markers of early respiratory disease in preterm infants predict interstitial lung lesions at autopsy? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;82(2):F114–F120.

Kaur A, Bhatia BD, Guglani V. Respiratory distress syndrome in very low birth weight neonates: a study from a tertiary care center in north India. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84(8):620–624.

Gupta MK, Singh M, Singh JV. Outcome of very low birth weight infants admitted to a level III neonatal center in North India. J Trop Pediatr. 2012;58(6):443–448.

Afjeh SA, Fazlollahi F, Niknafs P, Yousefi B. Incidence and risk factors of pulmonary hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants. J Trop Pediatr. 2018;64(1):53–59.

Sonawane RS, Deshmukh SP, Bagul S, Gangane NM. Factors influencing mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight babies: a study in Western Maharashtra. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2015;2(2):93–98.

Benitz WE, et al. Patent ductus arteriosus in very low birth weight infants. NeoReviews. 2014;15(12):e590–e602

Downloads

Published

2025-06-05

How to Cite

1.
Rao US, Abraham SR. A Study of Complications and Immediate Outcome of Vlbw and Elbw Babies Admitted in Tertiary Care Hospital. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.5 [cited 2025Jun.20];14(31S):267-73. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7114