Examining The Interrelationships Between Technology Acceptance, AI-Based Tools Usage, And Technology-Based Tutoring Systems And Their Impact: A Study Of Higher Education Institution In Lucknow

Authors

  • Runita Sahai Marwah
  • Bineet Kumar Gupta
  • Satya Bhushan verma
  • Ratnartuh Mishra
  • Neeraj Kumar
  • Saiyed Faiayaz waris

Keywords:

Technology Acceptance, Level of use of AI based tools, Technology based Tutoring System, Organizational Performance, and Students’ Performance

Abstract

The integration of technology into education has ushered in a new era of learning and teaching, with AI-based tools emerging as potential game-changers. Understanding how these tools are accepted, used, and impact student outcomes and organizational performance is crucial for maximizing their potential benefits. This study investigate the interrelationships between technology acceptance, the level of use of AI-based tools, and the adoption of technology-based tutoring systems, student performance and organizational performance. Using a research survey design and employing quota sampling technique, primary data was collected from a sample of 546 students from Lucknow-based Higher Education Institutions using a structured Likert scale questionnaire. Data was gathered over three months (March-May 2024) via Google Forms. The instrument's validity and reliability were established. Data analysis involved frequency, descriptive, correlation, and regression analyses using SPSS 25. The results showed that Technology acceptance significantly influences AI tool usage and technology-based tutoring, both of which positively impact student performance. Improved student performance subsequently contributes to enhanced organizational outcomes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.

Ahmad, T. (2019). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ HESWBL-12-2018-0136.

Al-Badi, A., Khan, A., & Eid-Alotaibi (2022), Perceptions of Learners and Instructors towards Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning. Procedia Computer Science, 201(C), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.058

Andrea, K., Holz, E. M., Sellers, E. W., & Vaughan, T. M. (2015). Toward independent home use of braincomputer interfaces: A decision algorithm for selection of potential end-users. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(3), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.036.

Ayanwale M.A., Sanusi I.T., Adelana O.P., Aruleba K.D. & Oyelere S.S., (2022), Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099.

Bigg, S. J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill & Open University Press.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4–16 (Publisher: Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA).

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. ERIC.

Buckner, E. (2011). The role of higher education in the Arab State and Society: Historical legacies and recent reform patterns. Comparative and International Higher Education, 3(1), 21–26 https://elizabethbuckner. files.wordpress.com/2012/01/buckner-number03—06.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2018.

Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2016). Smili: A framework for interfaces to learning data in open learner models, learning analytics and related fields. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 293–331.

Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B. (2006). Learning factors analysis–a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 164–175). Springer.

Chaudhary, S. (2017), Artificial Intelligence in Education, International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 6(4), APRIL (2017), 16-28.

Chaudhary, S. (2017). Artificial intelligence applications in education. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 120-135.

Chounta, I. A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2021). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian k- 12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–31.

Chrisinger, D. (2019). The solution lies in education: Artificial intelligence & the skills gap. On the Horizon, 27(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2019-096.

Chu, S. T., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(May), 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091

Cox, A., Hunter, A., & Smith, J. (2019). AI in higher education: Enhancing the learning experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 431-446.

Cox, A., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1108 /LHT-08-2018-0105.

Cremer, D., & Bettignies, H. C. (2013). Pragmatic business ethics. The Leadership Maestro, 24(2), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2013.00938.x.

Croxford, L., & Raffe, D. (2015). The iron law of hierarchy? Institutional differentiation in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1625–1640. https://doi.org/10.1080 /03075079.2014.899342.

Dai Chih-Pu and Ke Fengfeng (2022), Educational applications of artificial intelligence in simulation-based learning: A systematic mapping review, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100087.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Drake, B. M., & Walz, A. (2018). Evolving business intelligence and data analytics in higher education. New Direct. Institut. Res., 39–52, 2018.

Gamoura, Samiah, Mohamed, Bay & Krosh, Haiziah. (2018). Artificial Intelligence: A New Challenge of Law. International Forum. Algeria (26-27 November 2018)

Gunning, D. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence (xai). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). nd Web 2.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.

Khare, K., Stewart, B. & Khare, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the student experience: An institutional perspective. The International Academic Forum (IAFOR).

Khare, K., Stewart, B., & Khare, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and its impact on student success. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 239-256.

Khosravi, H., Shabaninejad, S., Bakharia, A., Sadiq, S., Indulska, M., & Gaˇsevi´c, D. (2021), Intelligent learning analytics dashboards: Automated drill-down recommendations to support teacher data exploration. Jouranl of Learning Analytics, 8, 133–154.

Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y. S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(August 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074

Kreber, C. (2005). Reflection on teaching and the scholarship of teaching: Focus on science instructors. Higher Education, 50, 323–359.

Kremer, M., Brannen, C., & Glennerster, R. (2013). The challenges of education and learning in the developing world. Science, 340(6130), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235350.

Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta- analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86, 42–78.

Kumar, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence divulges effective tactics of top management institutes of India. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2188–2204. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0251.

Kumar, V. (2019). Personalized learning through AI: A review. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 45-59.

Ma, Y., & Siau, K. L. (2018). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Impacts and implications. Computers & Education, 123, 10-22.

Menon, R., Tiwari, A., Chhabra, A., & Singh, D. (2014). Study on the higher education in India and the need for a paradigm shift. Procedia Economics and Finance, II, 1, 886–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212- 5671(14)00250-0.

Mitrovic, A. (2003). An intelligent sql tutor on the web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 173–197.

Nasrallah, R. (2014). Learning outcomes role in higher education teaching. Education, Business and Society, 7(4), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBS-03-2014-0016.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2013). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066.

Ocaa-Fernández, Y., Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A., & Garro-Aburto, L. L. (2019). Artificial intelligence and its role in educational excellence. Journal of Educational Innovation, 18(4), 88-102.

Ocaña-Fernández, Y., Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A. & Garro-Aburto, L. L. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 7(2), 553-568.

Scieluna, H. A., Grimm, M. C., O’Sullivan, A., Harris, P., Pilotto, L. S., Jones, P. O., & McNeil, H. P. (2012). Clinical capabilities of graduates of an outcome-based integrated medical program. BMC Medical Education, 23(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-23.

Self, J., et al. (1999). The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: Itss care, precisely. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 350–364.

Silander, C., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Individual growth or institutional development? Ideological perspectives on motives behind Swedish higher education teacher training. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 77, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0272-z.

Stefan, A. D. P., & Sharon, K. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 3–13. https://doi. org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., & Schwarz, A. (2009). Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 1 10. https://doi.org/10.1057 /jit.2008.30.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-24

How to Cite

1.
Marwah RS, Gupta BK, verma SB, Mishra R, Kumar N, waris SF. Examining The Interrelationships Between Technology Acceptance, AI-Based Tools Usage, And Technology-Based Tutoring Systems And Their Impact: A Study Of Higher Education Institution In Lucknow. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May24 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(26S):869-77. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6452

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 26S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.