A Critical Analysis Of The Biological Patent In India

Authors

  • Shikha Gupta
  • Yogendra Singh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i16S.6386

Keywords:

Patent, Technology, Genetic, Legal, Intellectual Property

Abstract

Bio-patenting is a rapidly growing field that encompasses a rapidly expanding field of genetic research and technology. Its advanced medical discoveries, diagnostic techniques, genetically modified crops and gene therapy are benefits of genetic research and technology. The rapidly growing field of legal support structures, such as bio patents, it also emerged and gained importance as well as some fame associated with it this year. The nature of genetic bio patents is often debated with mixed results. It has become a topic of interest to many people. This paper aims to delve deeper into the complex scope and provide a comprehensive analysis of the various impacts of bio patenting. On the one hand, patenting genetic material leads to economic investment and encourages innovation, but on the other hand it can limit research and raise many ethical concerns such as the ethics of commoditizing genetic material and commercializing it. We want to find balance protecting the rights of patent holders and respecting ethical boundaries promoting the well-being of the public. It can be said that bio patents are two-fold. The legal scope of bio patents in India is unclear and needs clarification and a clearly defined legal framework to qualify for patenting of genetic material. This article takes an in-depth look at the evolving timeline of the gene patenting landscape in India and aims to highlight the much-needed legal clarity in this particular area. This document highlights the legal, and Ethical aspects of bio patenting in India and address key issues It requires critical evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kshitij Kumar Singh, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Social Implications (2015 springer publication)

Department of Biotechnology. Available at http://www.dbtindia.nic.in/ access on 02/10/2024

Article 27 (3) (b) of the TRIPS Agreement

Dimminaco AG v Controller of Patents and Designs, [2002] I.P.L.R. 255 (Cal)

Bioethics and Patent Law: The Case of the Onco mouse, WIPO Magazine (2006) https://abg-ip.com/living-beings-patented/ access on 08/10/2024

D.E.Komb, “Patent and Trade Secret Protection in University-Industry Research in Biotechnology” 24

HJL 210.

Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980),

Pioneer Hibbred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds Inc., 35F, 3d. 1226.3, USPQ, 2d. 1385 (8th Cir. 1994)

Moore v. Regents of the University of California, (51 Cal. 3d 120; 271 Cal. Rptr. 146; 793 P.2d 479)

SD Gangane, ‘Human Genetics’ (Third Edition), Elsevier (2008).

https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2022/08/04/another-legislative-attempt-to-revive-gene-patenting/ access on 25/10/2024

Michael A. Heller and Rebecca S. Eisenberg, “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti- commons in

https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/art27_3b_background_e.htm access on 05/11/2024

http://fbae.org/2009/FBAE/website/our-position-ipr.html access on 08/11/2024

https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04c_e.htm access on 13/11/2024

https://www.insightsonindia.com/2019/04/25/protection-of-plant-varieties-and-farmers-rights-ppvfr-act-2001/ access on 20/11/2024

https://vikaspedia.in/agriculture/policies-and-schemes/crops-related/protection-of-plant-varieties-and-rights-of-farmers/protection-of-plant-varieties-and-farmers-rights-act-2001 access on 22/11/2024

http://www.ielrc.org/content/a0304.pdf access on 25/11/2024

Musyuni, P. (n.d.). Patenting Of Biotechnological Products Issues Perspective To US, Europe and India. IJPSR.

Marippan v. Safiullah, 2008 (38) PTC 341 (Mad)(DB).

Biotechnology Patent and Related Moral Issues - Intellectual Property - India.

‘Brief History of Patenting in India’ Guidelines for examination of Biotechnological Patents by Office of Controller General of Patents and Designs of India (March 2013)

Lallubhai v. Chimanlal, (1935) 37 BOMLR 665

Section 10 of Indian Patents Act, 1970.

https://www.mondaq.com/india/patent/758110/biotechnology-patent-and-related-moral-issues access on 02/12/2023

Section 3(j) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970.

Biomedical Research” 280 Science 698 (1998).

Ibid.

http://www.genomicglossaries.com/content/intellectual_property.asp access on 03/11/2024

http://www.wipo.int/patents/en/topics/biotechnology.html access on 04/11/2024

Amgen Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., 927 F2d 1200 (Fed. Cir. 1991) at p. 329.

Railroad Dynamics Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 469 US 871 (1984).

Aniruddha Sen, “Clear and Complete Disclosure in Biotechnology Patent Applications- A Comparison

of the Laws in the USA, Europe and India” Hanse LR 95 (2006).

US 519, 86 S. Ct. 1033 (1965).

Ibid.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-23

How to Cite

1.
Gupta S, Singh Y. A Critical Analysis Of The Biological Patent In India. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May23 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(16S):1070-6. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6386