Legal Implications of Dual Jurisdiction in Connectivity Cases: a Study of the Major Point of Loss of Criminal Acts from the Perspective of Legal Certainty

Authors

  • Muhammad Bayanullah
  • Moh. Khusaini
  • Abdul Madjid
  • Slamet Wahyudi

Keywords:

Judicial Dualism, Connectivity Cases, Criminal Procedure Code, Point of Loss of Loss, Legal Certainty, Military Judicial Commission

Abstract

This study examines regulatory weaknesses in Chapter XI of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding connexity cases, analyses the juridical implications of judicial dualism on legal certainty, and proposes legal reforms to enhance certainty in criminal procedure. Using Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal certainty, the theory of connexity, and the theory of civil supremacy, the research highlights the need for clear rules and consistent law enforcement. Employing a normative legal method with a juridical-analytical approach, the study reviews relevant legislation (Criminal Procedure Code, Attorney General’s Act, Military Justice Act) and case studies (TWP-AD and Satellite Procurement Project) using qualitative descriptive analysis. Findings reveal that the ambiguous definitions of "public interest" and "military interest" in Chapter XI of the Criminal Procedure Code contribute to judicial dualism in connexity cases. The study underscores the need to reinforce coordination through the Military Prosecutor for Military Criminal Matters (Jampidmil), whose role is currently underrepresented in the legal framework. Reform is necessary to establish clearer parameters for determining jurisdictional emphasis and integrating Jampidmil into the criminal procedural system. This research has significant implications, advocating for amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code to eliminate judicial dualism, strengthen Jampidmil’s role as a technical coordinator, and enhance legal certainty within the judicial system. By focusing on the juridical impact of judicial dualism and offering concrete solutions for reform, this study contributes to the development of Indonesia’s criminal procedural law with an original and practical approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amalia, D. S. (2022). Formulasi Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara Yang Tidak Diatur Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.148

Badu, L. W., & Apripari, A. (2019). Menggagas Tindak Pidana Militer Sebagai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Militer Dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal legalitas, 12(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v12i1.5788

Edy, S. S. (2017). Independensi sistem peradilan militer di Indonesia (Studi tentang struktur peradilan militer). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(1), 105-128.

Fadhlurrahman, F., Rafiqi, R., & Kartika, A. (2019). Proses Penyidikan Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Yang Dilakukan Oleh TNI-AD (Studi Di Pengadilan Militer I-02 Medan). JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v1i1.194

Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634

Heriyanto, H. (2024). Legal Analysis of The Authority of Military Courts in Trying Officers Who Commit General Crimes. Ratio Legis Journal, 3(3), 400-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.3.%25p

Ikawati, L. (2021). Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pengguna Narkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Yang Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Keadilan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia)).

Irianto, Y. (2022). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Keabsahan Penyitaan Asset Milik Tersangka Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Berbasis Keadilan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia)).

Mahmud, M. I. (2021). Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Medis Dan Sosial Bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika Oleh Badan Narkotika Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (Bnnp Diy).

Milky, F. J., Ucuk, Y., & Sidarta, D. D. (2024). Asas Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 4(03), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v4i03.1508

Pakpahan, N. H., & Gaol, Y. R. C. L. (2022). Kekosongan Hukum Dalam Penilaian Letak Kerugian Pada Kepentingan Umum atau Kepentingan Militer Sebagai Dasar Kewenangan Peradilan Koneksitas. Sanskara Hukum dan HAM, 1(02), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v1i02.65

Saragih, G. M., & Fadly, Y. D. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Peranan Penegak Hukum Dalam Hal Autopsi Forensik Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 197-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v11i2.8306

Sari, O. N., Arfiani, N., & Mustofa, M. (2023). Independensi Penuntutan Perkara Koneksitas Ditinjau dari Peraturan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 2021 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kejaksaan. WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v2i2.2307

Syaugi, S. (2017). Konstitusi Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia (Melacak Argumen Konstitusi terhadap Penerapan Ekonomi Syariah). Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 11(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v11i2.1291

Yuliani, A. N. (2021). Tindak Pidana Insubordinasi yang Dilakukan Oleh Prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Hasanuddin).

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Bayanullah M, Khusaini M, Madjid A, Wahyudi S. Legal Implications of Dual Jurisdiction in Connectivity Cases: a Study of the Major Point of Loss of Criminal Acts from the Perspective of Legal Certainty. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May14 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(3):274-8. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5847

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.