A Retrospective Study Of Breast Augmentation In Transgender Women : Outcome, Complications, Patient Satisfaction.

Authors

  • Mohan Raj. M
  • Gabriel Ernest M.S
  • V.L. Aishwarya MS. M.Ch
  • Dharmarajan .S, M.S
  • M. Ramula, M.S
  • Ashiq.A

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i22S.5825

Keywords:

N\A

Abstract

Background Breast augmentation is a crucial component of gender-affirming surgery for many transgender women. However, limited data exist on postoperative recovery, complication rates, and satisfaction in this population. This retrospective study compares outcomes between sub glandular and sub pectoral implant placements in transgender women.

Objectives To compare postoperative pain, recovery time, and complication rates between sub-glandular and sub-pectoral breast augmentation in transgender women. To assess patient satisfaction across both surgical approaches. To identify factors influencing postoperative complications and satisfaction.

Methods: A total of 98 transgender women who underwent primary breast augmentation between 2023 and 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on implant location: sub glandular (Group A) and sub pectoral (Group B). Parameters evaluated included operative data, postoperative recovery, complications, and satisfaction.
Results: Group A (n=41) and Group B (n=57) showed similar demographic profiles. Group A had significantly less postoperative pain duration (mean 49.2 h vs. 68.5 h), and shorter drain use (1.8 vs. 3.0 days). Nipple-areola numbness was more common in Group A (9.7%). Capsular contracture and displacement were slightly more prevalent in Group B, though not statistically significant. Overall satisfaction was high in both groups (82.9% in Group A vs. 78.9% in Group B rated satisfaction ≥4 on a 5-point scale).

Conclusion: Sub glandular placement may offer faster recovery and less postoperative discomfort, while sub pectoral placement could reduce the risk of visible implant edges in thinner patients. Satisfaction was influenced primarily by complications like contracture and displacement, not implant plane.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deutsch MB. Guidelines for the Primary and Gender-Affirming Care of Transgender and Gender Nonbinary People. 2nd ed. UCSF; 2016.

van de Grift TC, et al. Surgical satisfaction, quality of life, and mental health outcomes in transgender individuals. J Sex Med. 2018;15(5):643-650.

Cregten-Escobar P, et al. Breast augmentation in transgender women: A prospective multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(3):237e-245e.

Spear SL, et al. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:188S–198S.

Swanson E. Prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1158-1166.

Cheng MH, Huang JJ. Augmentation mamma-plasty in asian women. Semin Plast Surg 2009; 23: 48-54.

Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 757-767.

Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Holmich LR, Mc-Laughlin JK, Kjoller K, Hoyer AP, Olsen JH, Friis S. Surgical intervention and capsular contrac- ture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plas Surg 2005; 54: 343-351.

Henriksen TF, Holmich LR, Fryzek JP, Friis S, McLaughlin JK, Hoyer AP, Kjoller K, Olsen JH. Incidence and severity of short-term complica- tions after breast augmentation: results from a nationwide breast implant registry.Ann Plas Surg 2003; 51: 531-539.

Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM, Adams WP. Preventing capsular contracture in breast augmentation: in search of the Holy Grail. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1759-1760.[11] Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A,

Thiels C, Nahai FR, Hester TR, Nahai F. A 15-year experience with primary breast augmen-tation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 1300-1310.

Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP. Style 410 highly cohe-sive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 40-48.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Raj. M M, M.S GE, MS. M.Ch VA, .S, M.S D, M.S MR, Ashiq.A A. A Retrospective Study Of Breast Augmentation In Transgender Women : Outcome, Complications, Patient Satisfaction. . J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025 May 14 [cited 2026 Mar. 3];14(22S):1040-4. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5825