On Pump versus Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta Analysis
Keywords:
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, On-Pump CABG, Off-pump CABGAbstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading global cause of mortality and morbidity. While both on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are used for surgical revascularization, the optimal approach remains debated. On-pump CABG, involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), offers a motionless surgical field but is associated with systemic complications. Off-pump CABG avoids CPB, potentially reducing inflammation, neurocognitive damage, and renal dysfunction, particularly in high-risk patients. However, concerns about incomplete revascularization and long-term graft patency persist.
Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes between on-pump and off-pump CABG using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide statistically significant evidence.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified eligible RCTs. Studies reporting risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) for clinical outcomes were included. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata-16 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.
Results: Seven RCTs were analyzed. The pooled RR for off-pump versus on-pump CABG was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78–1.07), and the pooled OR was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.75–1.10), indicating no statistically significant difference. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I² ≈ 30%). Funnel plot inspection showed minimal publication bias.
Conclusion: Off-pump CABG demonstrated a slight, non-significant reduction in adverse outcomes compared to on-pump CABG. Both approaches appear comparable in safety and effectiveness. Surgical expertise and patient selection remain crucial in determining the optimal technique
Downloads
Metrics
References
Shahjehan RD, Sharma S, Bhutta BS. Coronary Artery Disease. Medical Nursing. 2024 Oct 9;110–4.
Khan MS, Islam MYU, Ahmed MU, Bawany FI, Khan A, Arshad MH. On Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Review. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;6(3):186.
Tashiro T, Wada H, Nishimi M, Minematsu N. Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;61(8):429–34.
Zhu L, Li D, Zhang X, Wan S, Liu Y, Zhang HJ, et al. Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):4263.
Chen Y, Wan F. Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a training course for novices and its learning curve. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57(3):141–7.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251029184CABG Vs Off-Pump CABG. PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251029184. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251029184.
Sreshta EG, Miller TM, McQuitty AL. Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Critical Care Obstetrics, Seventh Edition. 2024 Aug 12;305–22.
Yang L, Lin S, Zhang H, Gu D, Chen S, Shi Y, et al. Long-Term Graft Patency After Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A CORONARY Trial Cohort. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2020 Dec 1;110(6):2055–61.
Koop Y, Nathoe H, Bots M, Grobbee DE, Timmermans M, Wimmers RH, et al. Octopus follow-up: 20 year prognosis in patients randomized to on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG or PCI. Int J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 1;414.
Shroyer ALW, Quin JA, Wagner TH, Carr BM, Collins JF, Almassi GH, et al. Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Impact: Diabetic Patient 5-Year Coronary Artery Bypass Clinical Outcomes. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2019 Jan 1;107(1):92–8.
Shroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA, et al. Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):623–32.
Stevens LM, Noiseux N, Avezum A, Ayapati DR, Chen X, Lucchesee FA, et al. Conversion after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: The CORONARY trial experience. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):539–46.
Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Straka Z, et al. Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2359–68.
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM, et al. Effects of on-pump and off-pump surgery in the arterial revascularization trial. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2014 Sep 1;47(6):1059–65.
Marczin N, Raja SG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. AME Med J. 2020 Mar 1;5(0).
Jiang Y, Xu L, Liu Y, Deng B, Dong N, Chen S. Beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul 1;13(7):4185–94.
He L, Tiemuerniyazi X, Chen L, Yang Z, Huang S, Nan Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):5063.
Deppe AC, Arbash W, Kuhn EW, Slottosch I, Scherner M, Liakopoulos OJ, et al. Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16 900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2016 Apr 1;49(4):1031–41.
Hastings S, Myles P, McIlroy D. Aspirin and coronary artery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep 1;115(3):376–85.
Raja SG. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: comparative effectiveness. Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2015 Nov 4;5:73–9.
Gupta AK, Zaka A, Lombardo A, Tsimiklis J, Stretton B, Kovoor JG, et al. Perioperative aspirin and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery. 2025 Apr 1;180:109003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
