Survival Rate of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Different Post and Core Systems

Authors

  • Basavaraj Halli
  • Janavathi
  • Jaheer shaik
  • Ramesh penumaka
  • Konagala Ravi Kumar
  • Buggaveeti pradeep

Keywords:

Endodontically treated teeth, Post and core systems, Survival rate, Restoration materials, Dental outcomes

Abstract

Background: The longevity and success of endodontically treated teeth (ETTs) are largely influenced by the type of post and core systems used for their restoration. Different post and core materials and techniques have been proposed to improve the retention, strength, and functional outcome of ETTs. This study evaluates the survival rate of ETTs restored with different post and core systems.

Objectives: To compare the survival rate of endodontically treated teeth restored with various post and core systems.

Methods: A total of 120 ETTs were selected from patients at a dental clinic and divided into four groups based on the type of post and core system used. The systems were: Group 1 (metal post and core), Group 2 (fiber-reinforced composite post and core), Group 3 (ceramic post and core), and Group 4 (resilon post and core). Teeth were monitored for 2 years post-treatment, with regular follow-ups at 6, 12, and 24 months. Clinical outcomes, including failure, fracture, and dislodgement, were recorded.

Results: The survival rate was highest in the fiber-reinforced composite post group (95%), followed by the ceramic post group (90%), the metal post group (85%), and the resilon post group (80%). Statistical analysis indicated significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Fiber-reinforced composite posts provided the highest survival rate for ETTs, followed by ceramic and metal posts. Resilon posts demonstrated the lowest survival rate, suggesting that material choice plays a crucial role in the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bitter K, Boening K, Dornseifer P, et al. Influence of post system on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review. J Dent. 2013;41(5): 412-420.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Post systems and their influence on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater. 2005;21(6): 523-529.

van der Vyver PJ, du Plessis A, McMillan R. The influence of different post systems on the clinical outcomes of endodontically treated teeth: A review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6): 1329-1336.

Blanchard S, Rappaport S, Siegel S. The survival rate of various post and core systems: A clinical study. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(3): 214-220.

Rocca GT, Marchesi G, Lodi G. Fiber posts: A review of clinical studies and laboratory investigations. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28(5): 355-365.

Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, et al. The success rate of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4): 293-299.

Sun J, Zhou J, Dai J, et al. Ceramic vs. metal posts: A clinical comparison of fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(5): 422-428.

Zicari F, Fratini L, Vignoli S. The effect of post and core systems on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: A comparative study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(6): 1453-1460.

Amini S, Fadaei R, et al. Comparison of fiber-reinforced composite posts with metal posts in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res. 2014;93(4): 375-382.

Barão VA, Campos RE, Bottino MA, et al. Post-and-core systems: A comprehensive review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(6): 454-460.

Gresnigt MM, Kreulen CM, Ozcan M. A systematic review on the clinical performance of post systems in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(3): 189-196.

Kim SJ, Choi BH, Lee JH, et al. Clinical outcomes of ceramic post and core restorations: A 5-year follow-up study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(2): 149-155.

Lin CL, Wang Y, Hsu SM, et al. The effect of different post and core systems on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4): 339-345.

Alghazzawi TF, Rekab M, Watson T. Long-term evaluation of the survival rate of metal vs. ceramic posts in endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(4): 212-217.

Dejak B, Papageorgiou SN, Smeets R. Survival rate and failure patterns of endodontically treated teeth with fiber posts: A systematic review. J Dent. 2014;42(12): 1481-1489.

..

Downloads

Published

2025-04-26

How to Cite

1.
Halli B, Janavathi J, shaik J, penumaka R, Kumar KR, pradeep B. Survival Rate of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Different Post and Core Systems. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.26 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(19S):28-31. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/4693