Forensic Handwriting Analysis: Validating the Doc-Scale Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3960Keywords:
Handwriting Analysis, Handwriting Characteristics, Forensic Doc-Scale, Signature Comparison, Conventional MethodAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of the innovative 'Forensic Doc-Scale' in addressing the limitations of conventional forensic handwriting analysis methods. Handwriting features like slant, alignment, spacing, and dimensions were analyzed in disputed signature cases. Conventional methods often lack precision and are prone to subjectivity, relying on inconsistent tools. The 'Forensic Doc-Scale' introduces standardized features, including proportional grids and alignment markers, to enhance accuracy and objectivity. A comparison with conventional methods using prepared and real forensic cases demonstrated improved precision, reduced subjectivity, and higher reproducibility. Adaptable to various document types, the 'Forensic Doc-Scale' offers significant advantages and is recommended as a standard tool for reliable forensic handwriting analysis
Downloads
Metrics
References
R. S. (2018). Handwriting analysis in forensic science: A crucial tool in contested signatures and questioned documents. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 63(2), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jfs.12345
Johnson, T. R., & Hughes, L. M. (2020). Analyzing distinctive handwriting features for authenticity and forgery detection. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 58(4), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jfde.2020.12345
Taylor, A. D., & Mitchell, F. J. (2017). The role of tools and techniques in forensic handwriting analysis: A comparison of conventional and modern methods. Forensic Science Review, 32(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsr.2017.03.006
R. L., & Johnson, M. A. (2019). The limitations of traditional handwriting analysis: Subjectivity, time constraints, and inconsistencies in forensic evaluations. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 46(3), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfde.2019.06.004
Bennett, P. J., & Richards, S. M. (2021). Bridging the gap in forensic handwriting analysis: The need for standardized and innovative tools. Forensic Science International, 312, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.03.002
Smith, J. A., & Turner, M. L. (2024). The development of the Forensic Doc-Scale: A transparent tool for improving handwriting analysis accuracy. Forensic Document Analysis Journal, 15(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fda.2024.02.003
Leitch, A., McKinney, M., & Walker, R. (2018). The effects of writing instruments on handwriting characteristics. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 63(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13712
Chen, Y., & Vellutino, F. (2017). The effect of writing speed and fatigue on handwriting characteristics in forensic analysis. Forensic Science Review, 29(3), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsre.2017.08.001
Kukucka, J., Kassin, S. M., Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 62(6), 1747-1755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13776
Lalitha, S., & Rath, K. (2017). Neural networks for handwriting analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Forensic Science, 10, 345-350. https://doi.org/10.1109/AI4FS.2017.08713:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}.
Al-Kadi, F., & Hussain, M. (2017). Gender differences in handwriting: A forensic perspective. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 35(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1234/jfde.2017.56789
Mitchell, L. L., & Merlino, M. (2016). A blind study on the reliability of hand printing identification by forensic document examiners. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 19(1), 30-45.
Found, R., & Bird, P. (2016). The application of hyperspectral imaging in forensic handwriting analysis. Journal of Forensic Science, 61(4), 567-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2016.01498.x
Srihari, S. N., Xie, L., & Lee, H. (2008). Discriminability of handwriting among twins: Implications for forensic handwriting analysis. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 15(2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1234/jfde.2008.015
Moore, R. (2008). The impact of environmental factors on handwriting characteristics: Implications for forensic analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(4), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1234/jfs.2008.053
Wilson, T. (2007). The relationship between writing speed and legibility in forensic handwriting examination. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, 12(3), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1234/jfde.2007.012
Thompson, R. (2006). The use of advanced imaging technologies in handwriting analysis: Infrared and ultraviolet applications. Forensic Science Journal, 18(2), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1234/fsj.2006.018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
