Evaluating The Vertebral Structure Using Ultrasound Examination At Manually Identified Midpoint Of Intracristal Line In Pregnant Women

Authors

  • Mohd Faheem Ansari
  • Akshat Agarwal
  • Edamakanti Swetha Soni
  • Razi Shahid
  • M Srinivas Rao

Keywords:

Palpation, Pregnancy, Spinal anaesthesia, Ultrasonogram

Abstract

Introduction: In order to deliver subarachnoid blocks, the intercristal line and associated vertebral level have historically been found by manual palpation. However, an alternate method for precise vertebral identification is ultrasound examination.

Aim and Objective: To study the vertebral structure using ultrasound examination at manually identified midpoint of intracristal line in pregnant women.

Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Surgery with collaboration with Department of Anesthesia.  It involved 200 pregnant women at term. Two independent observers estimated the vertebral space at the intercristal line– one using manual palpation and the other using ultrasound guidance. Determining the vertebral structure utilising ultrasound examination at the manually designated midway of the intercristal line in term pregnant women was the main outcome evaluated. Assessing the accuracy of manual palpation in identifying vertebral levels in comparison to ultrasound examination and analysing variables like Body Mass Index (BMI) that may affect the accuracy of vertebral level identification were the secondary outcomes evaluated.

Results: The study included 200 pregnant women with a mean age was 22.81±3.75 years in the study population. The mean gestational age (weeks) was 38.95±1.15 in the study population. The minimum gestational age was 37 weeks, and the maximum was 41 weeks. The mean pre-pregnant weight (kg) was 52.85±9.50 in the study population. The ultrasonographic assessment revealed that the manually palpated intercristal line corresponded to the L4 vertebra level in 50% of cases, the L3-L4 intervertebral space level in 30%, the intended L4-L5 intervertebral space level in 15%, the L5 vertebra level in 3%, and the L3 vertebra level in 2%.ultrasound examination showed that the manually palpated intercristal line was higher than the L4 vertebra or L4-L5 intervertebral space in 32% of the pregnant women.

Conclusion: According to the study, ultrasound examination, as opposed to manual palpation, may provide a more accurate way to identify spinal structures in pregnant women at term

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Reynolds F. Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2001; 56:238 – 47.

Lim S. WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2010;7(2):167-68.

Johnson AW, Adams L, Kho JB, et al. Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021;22:282. 10.1186/s12891-021-04157-0

Tozawa R, Katoh M, Aramaki H, et al. Reliability and validity of an ultrasound-based imaging method for measuring interspinous process distance in the lumbar spine using two different index points. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:2333–6. 10.1589/jpts.27.2333

Greaves JD. Serious spinal cord injury due to haematomyelia caused by spinal anaesthesia in a patient treated with low-dose heparin. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(2):150-54.

Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(11):1122-26.

Cooperstein R, Truong F. Systematic review and meta-analyses of the difference between thespinal level of the palpated and imaged iliac crests. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2017;61(2):106-20.

Neal JM, Brull R, Chan VW, Grant SA, Horn JL, Liu SS, McCartney CJ, Narouze SN, Perlas A, Salinas FV, Sites BD, Tsui BC. The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:S1–9.

Kettani A, Tachinante R, Tazi A. Evaluation of the iliac crest as anatomic landmark for spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women. Ann Fr Anaesth Reanim. 2006;25(5):501-04.

Chakraverty R, Pynsent P, Isaacs K. Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines? J Anat 2007;210:232– 6.

Pysyk CL, Persaud D, Bryson GL, Lui A. Ultrasound assessment of the vertebral level of the palpated intercristal (Tuffier’s) line. Can J Anaesth J Can Anaesth. 2010;57(1):46-49.

Hiwale S, Firtion C. Analysis of factors influencing accuracy of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020;30(2):156-62.

Lee AJ, Ranasinghe JS, Chehade JM, Arheart K, Saltzman BS, Penning DH, et al. Ultrasound assessment of the vertebral level of the intercristal line in pregnancy. Anaesth Analg. 2011;113(3):559-64.

Doyle DJ, Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anaesthesiologists Classification. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [cited 2024 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK441940/.

Ahmed AS, Ramakrishnan R, Ramachandran V, Ramachandran SS, Phan K, Antonsen EL. Ultrasound diagnosis and therapeutic intervention in the spine. J Spine Surg. 2018;4(2):423-32.

Jang JS, Kim JI, Ku B, Lee JH. Reliability analysis of vertebral landmark labellingon lumbar spine X-ray images. Diagnostics. 2023;13(8):1411.

Schlotterbeck H, Schaeffer R, Dow WA, Touret Y, Bailey S, Diemunsch P. Ultrasonographic control of the puncture level for lumbar neuraxial block in obstetric anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(2):230-34.

Kim SH, Kim DY, Han JI, Baik HJ, Park HS, Lee GY, et al. Vertebral level of Tuffier’s line measured by ultrasonography in parturients in the lateral decubitus position. Korean J Anaesthesiol. 2014;67(3):181-85.

Whitty R, Moore M, Macarthur A. Identification of the lumbar interspinous spaces: Palpation versus ultrasound. Anaesth Analg. 2008;106(2):538-40.

Shiraishi N, Matsumura G. Establishing intercrestal line by posture:- A radiographicevaluation. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2006;82(4):139-46

Horduna M, Legaye J. Influence of the sagittal anatomy of the pelvis on the intercrestal line position. Eur J. Anaesthesiol. 2008;25(3):200-05.

Malik M, Ismail S. Accuracy of Tuffier’s line identification by palpation method: Cross-sectional comparative study among obese, pregnant and control groups. Turk J AnaesthesiolReanim.2020;48(2):108-14.

Allison J. Lee et al. Ultrasound Assessment of the Vertebral Level of the Intercristal Line in Pregnancy. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. 2011; 113 (3).

Taylor and Francis. 2023.

Ulrike H Mitchell et al. Ultrasound imaging measures of vertebral bony landmark distances are weakly to moderately correlated with intervertebral disc height as assessed by MRI. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 Mar 25;8(1):e001292.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

1.
Faheem Ansari M, Agarwal A, Swetha Soni E, Shahid R, Rao MS. Evaluating The Vertebral Structure Using Ultrasound Examination At Manually Identified Midpoint Of Intracristal Line In Pregnant Women . J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.11 [cited 2025Apr.18];14(15S):1-7. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/3433

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 15S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.