The Development of Servant Leadership in Modern Organizational Management According to Good Governance Principles for Effectiveness of The Thailand Association of the Blind
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3341Keywords:
Servant Leadership, Modern Organizational Management, Good Governance, Service Organizational Effectiveness, Thailand Association of the BlindAbstract
The purposes of this research were: 1) To study servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, good governance management factors, and the overall service effectiveness of the Thailand Association of the Blind's executive committee; 2) To examine the relationships between servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, good governance management factors, and the overall service effectiveness of the Thailand Association of the Blind's executive committee; 3) To investigate the direct effects, indirect effects, and total effects of servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, and good governance management factors on the service effectiveness of the Thailand Association of the Blind's executive committee. The samples in this study consisted of 472 participants, including executives, vice presidents, committee members, and members of the Thailand Association of the Blind. Data was collected using questionnaires. Statistics employed in this study included percentage, mean, standard deviation, Pearson correlation coefficient, and path analysis. The research findings revealed that: 1) Servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, good governance management factors, and overall organizational effectiveness all had high mean values across all factors; 2) The relationships between servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, good governance management factors, and overall organizational effectiveness were statistically significant at the .01 level; 3) Servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, and good governance management factors had direct effects on organizational effectiveness at a statistically significant level of .01. Servant leadership factors and modern organizational management factors had direct effects on good governance management at a statistically significant level of .01. Servant leadership factors had indirect effects through good governance management factors on organizational effectiveness, with a positive total effect that was statistically significant at the .01 level (TE = 0.38, p < 0.01). Similarly, modern organizational management factors had indirect effects through good governance management factors on organizational effectiveness, with a positive total effect that was statistically significant at the .01 level (TE = 0.57, p < 0.01). Servant leadership factors, modern organizational management factors, and good governance management factors collectively explained and predicted 77% of organizational effectiveness factors (R² = 0.77).
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anuwat Kunkiew. (2017). Quantitative Research. Bangkok: Phetchabun Rajabhat University Press.
Alam, M., & Shahid, B. (2019). Leadership and governance principles and models: Implications in service organizations. Journal of Business and Organizational Management, 12(2), 105-118.
Aritthach Kaewkosaba. (2017). Good Governance Principles in the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, 2017. Bangkok: Secretariat of the House of Representatives.
Chaiwat Khamchoo et al. (2002). Principles of Good Governance. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Channuwong, S., Ruksat, S., & Ploychum, S. (2018). An integration of Buddhist teachings in stress management. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 11(4), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.14456/jcdr-hs.2018.29
Channuwong, S. (2018). The relationship between good governance principles and organizational justice: A case study of Bangkok government officials. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 18(3), 43-56.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1996). On becoming a servant leader. Jossey-Bass.
Office of the Secretariat of the Cabinet. (2022). Regulations of the Prime Minister's Office on Creating a Good Governance System for Public Administration and Society. Bangkok: Office of the Secretariat of the Cabinet.
Phra Maha Chai Buranachai. (2022). The Relationship between Leadership Styles, Good Governance, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Case Study of Buddhist Colleges in the Lower Northeastern Region. Journal of Buddhist Philosophy Development, 6(1), 131-144.
Somchai Thepsang. (2013). Leadership of Professional Executives. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Koontz, H., & Schimmel, W. H. (1982). Management information systems: An empirical and theoretical study. Prentice Hall.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2014). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
Page, D., & Wong, P. T. P. (2000). A conceptual framework for measuring servant leadership. In S. Adjibolosoo (Ed.), The human factor in shaping the course of history and development. University Press of America.
Patterson, K. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model of servant leadership. Servant Leadership Research Roundtable. Regent University.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
Ratanasuwanachart, N., & Kongyoungyune, R. (2024). The relationship between organizational climate and learning organization of international schools in Nonthaburi Province. NKRAFA Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(December), 92–104. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KANNICHA/article/view/275401/186512
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Sirathanakul, K., Harnpanich, B., Channuwong, S., Bangbon, P., Niangchaem, L.,
Sutthadaanantaphokin, K. (2023). The influence of human resource management on
educational administration of Thai Private Universities. Migration Letters, 20 (S1), 423-436.
Spears, L. C. (2004). Practicing servant-leadership. Leader to Leader, 2004(34), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.94
UNESCAP. (2009). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass.
Wongmajarapinya, K., Channuwong, S., & Pratoomsawat, T. (2024). The model of modern
management influencing sustainable organization development of Thai Smile Bus Company Limited. Migration Letters, 21(S2), 385-399.
World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. World Bank.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
Yukl, G. A. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
