Comparative Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology between Monozygotic and Dizygotic Individuals and Zygosity determination by Microsatellites -A Dermatoglyphic Study

Authors

  • Pratap Varma KVV
  • Pavithra Bai M
  • Suchareeta Panda
  • Shruti Patil
  • Goutham.N
  • Naveen kumar C

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3170

Keywords:

Twins, Monozygosity, Dizygosity, Cephalometrics, DNA markers

Abstract

Introduction: The interplay between genetic and environmental factors in craniofacial growth and development has long been a subject of research. This study aims to evaluate craniofacial morphology differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins and determine zygosity using microsatellites and dermatoglyphics.

Materials and Methodology: A total of 33 pairs of twins (aged 16–26 years) from Chennai were analyzed. Zygosity determination was performed using microsatellites as DNA markers and fingerprint dermatoglyphic patterns. Craniofacial morphology was assessed through cephalometric analysis. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Pearson's correlation and independent t-tests.

Results: Monozygotic twins exhibited a significantly higher genetic influence on vertical craniofacial parameters compared to dizygotic twins. Dermatoglyphic analysis showed that total numerical fingerprint values were more reliable in determining zygosity than ridge counts. Microsatellite markers provided a 98% accuracy rate in zygosity determination.

Conclusion: This study confirms that genetic factors strongly influence craniofacial morphology, particularly vertical dimensions. Microsatellite DNA markers are a highly reliable method for zygosity determination, while dermatoglyphic patterns offer supplementary insights. The findings have important implications for Orthodontic treatment planning by identifying heritable skeletal characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Akane A, Matsubara K, Shiono H, Yamada M, Nakagome Y: Diagnosis of twin zygosity by hyper variable RFLP markers. Am.J.Med Genet 1991 ; Oct 1:41(1):96-8.

Albert. Becker M.S Andreas Busjahn,Hans-Dieter F, Sylvia B, James Herbert S, Friedrich. Twin zygosity. Automated determination with microsatellites. J. Reprod Med 1997, May,42(5):260-6.

Allen G., Diagnostic efficiency of fingerprint and blood group differences in a series of twins. Acta Genet. 1968;17: 359-374.

Arya B.S, Savara B.S, Clarkson Q.D, and Thomas: -Genetic variability of craniofacial dimentions Am.J.Orthod 1973;43;207-215

Boklage C.E: Developmental differences between singletons and twins in distributions of dental diameter asymmetries. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol: 1987;74;318-31.

Bonnelykke B, Haug M, and Kristofferesen K, Gurtler H:Evaluation of zygosity diagnosis in twin pairs below age 7 by means of a mailed questionnaire. Acta Genet Med Gamellol (Roma);1989;38;(3-4):305-13

Boraas JC, Messer LB, Till MJ: A genetic contribution of dental caries, occlusion and morphology as demonstrated by twins reared apart. J. Dent Res 1988;Sep;67(9);1150-5

Brismer “Dermantogyphics of twins: A study based on a new systematic”. Acta Genetic Medicae et Gamellogiae, 1957; XVII.

Brown T; Townsend.G.C; Richards L.C: A study of dentofacial morphology in South Australian twins. Aust. Dent. Journal. 1987;32;81-90

Burke P.H., Intrapair facial differences in twins”. Acta Genet 1989;38;37-47

C Derom, E Bakker, R Vlietinck, R Derom, H Van den Berghe,M Thiery and P Pearson.Zygosity determination in new born Twins using DNA variants. Journal of Medical genetics.1985, vol 22, 279-82

Chen WJ, Chang HW, Wu MZ, Lin CC, Chang C, Chiu YN, Soong WT: Diagnosis of zygosity by questionnaire and polymarker polymerase chain reaction in young twins”. Behav Genet. 1999;-23Mar;29(2);115-23.

Claudio.M, Martina.R, and G.B.Grossi:Heretability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ,DZ and MN paired singletons. Am.J.Orthod. 1997;1:44-51.

Lundstorm. A and McWilliams J: Comparison of some cephalometric distances and corresponding facial proportions with regard to heritability. Eur. J or Orhod 1988: 10: 27-29.

Lundstorm. A; McWilliam J.S : A comparison of vertical and horizontal cephalometric variables with regard to heritability: Eur. J. Orthod 1987:9:104-108.

Lobb W.K. “Craniofacial morphology and occlusal variation in monozygous and dizygous twins” Angle Orthodont 1987;57;219-233

Dudas M. And Sassouni V. “The heredity components of mandibular growth, a longitudinal study “Am.J.Orthod 1973;43;314-323

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07

How to Cite

1.
Varma KVV P, Bai M P, Panda S, Patil S, Goutham.N G, kumar C N. Comparative Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology between Monozygotic and Dizygotic Individuals and Zygosity determination by Microsatellites -A Dermatoglyphic Study. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.7 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(12S):387-99. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/3170