The agreement between patient demands, surgeon recommendations, and the decision to perform blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty: A cross-sectional study in Ho Chi Minh City

Authors

  • Nguyen Thanh Van
  • Tran Dang Khoa
  • Ho Nguyen Anh Tuan
  • Cao Nguyen Hoai Thuong
  • Pham Dang Dieu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3119

Keywords:

blepharoplasty, dorsal hump reduction, nasal alar surgery, nasal bridge augmentation, single suture technique

Abstract

Background: The demand for cosmetic surgeries, particularly blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty, has risen significantly. However, the alignment between patient expectations, surgeon recommendations, and the final decision to undergo surgery remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the agreement between patient demands, surgeon recommendations, and the decision to perform blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1676 patients admitted to KAT Cosmetic Surgery and Thanh Van Cosmetic Hospital from January 2018 to June 2019. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate patient demands, surgeon recommendations, and actual surgeries performed. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was used to assess agreement among these factors.

Results: Blepharoplasty demand was more prevalent (81.3%) compared to rhinoplasty (22.8%). Upper lid blepharoplasty (70.1%) and nasal bridge augmentation (17.4%) were the most requested procedures. There was substantial agreement between patient demands and surgeon recommendations for the single suture technique (kappa = 0.89) and dorsal hump reduction (kappa = 0.77). However, no statistically significant agreement was found between patient demands and the decision to undergo surgery.

Conclusions: There was significant alignment between patient demands and surgeon recommendations but a weak agreement between patient demands and the actual decision to perform surgery. Thorough consultations are essential for ensuring patient satisfaction by aligning surgical outcomes with patient expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38(3):1-24. doi:10.1093/asj/sjy132

Rebowe RE, Runyan C. Blepharoplasty. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

Crosara PFTB, Nunes FB, Rodrigues DS, et al. Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 21(1):97-101.

The Aesthetic Society's Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank: Statistics 2019. Aesthet Surg J. 2020; 40(1):1-26. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaa144

Fakhro A, Yim HW, Kim YK, Nguyen AH. The Evolution of Looks and Expectations of Asian Eyelid and Eye Appearance. Semin Plast Surg. 2015; 29(3):135-144. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1556847

Young SM, Kim Y-D. Complications of Asian Double Eyelid Surgery: Prevention and Management. Facial Plast Surg. 2020; 36(5):592-601. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1717147

Lao WW, Hsieh TY, Ramirez AE. Differences and Similarities Between Eastern and Western Rhinoplasty: Features and Proposed Algorithms. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2021; 86(2):S259-S264.

Hoang Thi Phuong Lan, Nguyen Bac Hung. The methods to shape the upper eyelid fold. Journal of Medical Research. 2021; 141(5):90-94.

Pham TT. The Medicalization of Ethnicity in Vietnamese-American Women: Cosmetic Surgery and Hybridization. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2014; 5(22):92.

Tran Dang Khoa, Ho Nguyen Anh Tuan, Nguyen Duy Bac, Nguyen Thanh Van, Pham Dang Dieu, et al. Research on Macroanatomic and Histologic Characteristics of the Lower Lateral Nasal Cartilages in Vietnamese. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(24):4224-4229. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.365

Shipchandler TZ, Sultan B, Ishii L, et al. Aesthetic analysis in rhinoplasty: surgeon vs. patient perspectives: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013; 34:93-98.

Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, al. e. Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2011; 31:775-780.

Alosfoor M, Alkhalifah AA, Algadiem EA, Alarfaj AA, Alsalman A. Comparison Between Patient and Plastic Surgeon Aesthetic Analysis in Rhinoplasty Consultation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery Global open. Apr 2023; 11(4):e4948. doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000004948

Lee C, Ahn S, Kim N. Asian Upper Lid Blepharoplasty Surgery. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2013; 40:167-78. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2012.07.004

Li J, Li Q, Zhou B, et al. Predictive factors for cosmetic surgery: a hospital-based investigation. Springer Plus 2016; 5:1543.

Aquino YSJ. “Big eye” surgery: the ethics of medicalizing Asian features Theor Med Bioeth. 2017; 38(3):213-225.

Rohrich RJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: when the postoperative reflection does not meet patients' expectations. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Aug 2001; 108(2):507-9. doi:10.1097/00006534-200108000-00034

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07

How to Cite

1.
Thanh Van N, Dang Khoa T, Anh Tuan HN, Hoai Thuong CN, Dang Dieu P. The agreement between patient demands, surgeon recommendations, and the decision to perform blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty: A cross-sectional study in Ho Chi Minh City. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.7 [cited 2025Oct.5];14(10S):881-8. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/3119

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.