Screening of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Child) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Components under Foot Hills of Arunachal Pradesh

Authors

  • Kuldeep Kumar Bhargav
  • S.D. Warade
  • Abhay Saini
  • Akshita Bisht

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2968

Keywords:

Tomato genotypes, Growth parameters, Yield components

Abstract

The present study aimed to screen out fifty tomato genotypes with respect to growth and yield potential, under foot hill of Arunachal Pradesh at Vegetable Research Farm of College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat (Arunachal Pradesh) during Rabi season. The experiments were laid out in a Randomized Block Design with three replications under field condition. The present investigation revealed that the analysis of variance was highly significant for all the traits. Data were collected on growth parameters and yield components. Mean performance showed that genotype CHF-TOM-35 took minimum days to 50% flowering (35.33 days), 50% fruit setting (42.67 days) and days to first harvest (76.67). Genotype CHF-TOM-35 was also showed superior performance in result of yield contributing characters like Number of flower cluster per plant (10.37), Number of fruit per cluster (6.93), Number of fruit per plant (58.47), Fruit yield per plant (3.33 kg), Total fruit yield per plot (47.33 kg), and ultimately result in highest total fruit yield per hectare (788.77 q). The results of the present investigation clearly indicate that genotype CHF-TOM-35 were better in most of growth and yield parameters compared to other genotype. Hence it was recommended that farmer should grow tomato genotype CHF-TOM-35 for increased growth and yield in foot hill of Arunachal Pradesh.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anonoymous. 2014. http: //agriexchange, apeda. gov. in/ market / 20 profile / one / Tomato. aspx.

Anonymous. 2015. Hand Book on Horticulture Statistics. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. pp 48.

Arora, S.K., Pandit, M.L. and Singh, K. 1982. Study on the performance of tomato varieties under high temperature conditions. Haryana Agricultural University Journal Research. 12(3): 386- 397.

Bolibera, M.E., Amico, J.D., Bolarin, M.C. and Alfocea, F.P. 2000. Carbon partitioning and sucrose metabolism in tomato plants growing under salinity. Physiologia Plantarum. 110: 503 – 511.

Choudhury, B. 2006. Vegetables. National Book Trust, New Delhi, India. pp.43-54

Das, B., Hazarika, M.H. and Das, P.K. 1998. Genetic variability and correlation in fruit character of tomato. Annals of Agriculture Research. 19:77-80.

Dutta, R.K., Islam, M.S., BasetMia, M.A., Majid, M.A. and Lahiri, B.P. 1995. Comparative assessment of tomato varieties/advanced lines in relation to growth yield. Bangladesh Journal of Nuclear Agriculture. 11: 27-35.

Eshteshabul, D., Jahangir, M., Hakin, M.A., Amanullah, A.S.M. and Ahsanullah, A.S.M. 2010. An assessment of physicochemical properties of some tomato genotypes and varieties grown at Rangpur. Bangladesh Research Publication Journal. 4(3): 135-143.

FAOSTAT, 2010.faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancr.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2014. Area and production statistics of tomato. http://faostat.fao.org.

Ghosh, P. K., Syamal, M.M., Rai, N. and Joshi, A.K. 1995. Improvement of hybrid tomatoes. Advances in plant science. 2(1): 207-213.

Islam, P., Prakash, S. and Singh, A.K. 1999. Variability studies in tomato under sub-humid condition of Himachal Pradesh. South Indian horticulture 44:132-134.

Kabir, M.S.A. 2004. Morpho-physiological evaluation of elite genotypes of tomato in early summer season. M.Sc Thesis, Department of Crop botany. Bangladesh Agriculture University.

Khokhar, K.M., Hussain, S.I., Laghari, M.H., Mahmood, T. and Mahmud, M.M. 2001. Studies on yield potential of some exotic and local tomato cultivars grown for summer production in Pakistan. Journal of Biology Science. 10: 1215-1216.

Nandpuri, K.S., Kanwar, J.S. and Singh, S. 1974. Genetic variability and correlation of some economic characters in tomato. Journal Research of Punjab Agriculture University. 11(3): 242-246.

Norman, J.C. 1974. Some observation on the performance of 13 tomato cultivars of kumasi. Ghana Journal of Agriculture Science. 7(1): 51-56.

Nsowah, G.F. 1970. Preliminary studies of tomato processing varieties at wenchi, Ghana, Horticulture Abstract. 41(3): 68-74.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1985. Statistical methods for agricultural workers, 4th Edition, Indian council of agricultural Research, New Delhi. 108 p.

Rashid, M.M. 1983. "Shabjir chash" (In Bengali) first Edn. Rashid, B.S. Bangladesh. Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur. pp 86.

Rick, C.M. 1969. Origin of cultivated tomato, current status of the problem. International Botanical Congress. pp.180.

Sharma, S.K. and Rastogi, K.B. 1993. Evaluation of some tomato cultivars for seed production under mid hill condition of Himachal pradesh. Annals of Agricultural Research. 14(4): 494-496.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-03

How to Cite

1.
Kumar Bhargav K, Warade S, Saini A, Bisht A. Screening of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Child) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Components under Foot Hills of Arunachal Pradesh. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.3 [cited 2025Nov.3];14(9S):874-82. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2968