Comparing and Selecting The Performance Efficiency Of Computing Techniques For Real-Time Image Processing

Authors

  • Won-hyuk Choi
  • Woo-Jin Jung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2759

Keywords:

Cloud Computing, Edge Computing, AI-based On-device Edge Computing, Real-time Processing, Data Analysis

Abstract

Recently, increase in the importance of real-time data processing, it is essential to choose an efficient computing method. This study finds the optimal computing method by comparing the performance of cloud computing (CC), edge computing (EC), and edge computing (ODEC) using on-device edge computing (ODEC). In particular, we compare the strengths and weaknesses of each technology by taking examples in areas where fast data processing and real-time response are important, such as real-time video processing. According to the research results, it can be seen that cloud computing greatly increases latency due to bottlenecks in data transmission, while edge computing and on-device AI technology can minimize latency thanks to distributed structures. It compares the performance of each technology at various data scales and emphasizes that on-device AI-based approaches perform well in environments that are less affected by the network and require large-capacity data processing and real-time response. This presents the possibility of overcoming the limitations of existing computing models and developing into smarter systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Fernandes, V.; Carvalho, G.; Pereira, V.; Bernardino, J. Analyzing Data Reduction Techniques: An Experimental Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3436.

Siddiqui, S.T.; Khan, M.R.; Khan, Z.; Rana, N.; Khan, H.; Alam, M.I. Significance of Internet-of-Things Edge and Fog Computingin Education Sector. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA), Hail,Saudi Arabia, 5–6 February 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA; pp. 1–6

Nasir Abbas at al “Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey” IEEE internet of Things Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 450-465, Sep 2017.

Y. Mao et al., “A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts, Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2322–2358, Apr. 2017.

[J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp.1645-1660, Sept. 2013.

Chen, A.; Liu, F.H.; Wang, S.D.e. Data reduction for real-time bridge vibration data on edge. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, DSAA, Washington, DC, USA, 5–8 October 2019; pp. 602–603.

J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp.1645-1660, Sept. 2013.

Kyung-rae. C ; Seok-min.H; Won-hyuk.C . Performance Comparison and Optimal Selection of Computing Techniques for Corridor Surveillance Journal of the Korean Society of Navigation, 2023, 27.6: 771-776.

IFTIKHAR, Sundas, et al. AI-based fog and edge computing: A systematic review, taxonomy and future directions. Internet of Things, 2023, 21: 100674.

HUA, Haochen, et al. Edge computing with artificial intelligence: A machine learning perspective. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55.9: 1-35..

JMERENDA, Massimo; PORCARO, Carlo; IERO, Demetrio. Edge machine learning for ai-enabled iot devices: A review. Sensors, 2020, 20.9: 2533.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-29

How to Cite

1.
Choi W- hyuk, Jung W-J. Comparing and Selecting The Performance Efficiency Of Computing Techniques For Real-Time Image Processing. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Mar.29 [cited 2025Jul.17];14(4):284-90. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2759